Study of Tenecteplase (TNK) in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TNK-S2B)

NCT ID: NCT00252239

Last Updated: 2015-03-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine which of 3 different doses of tenecteplase (TNK) is better for treating stroke patients and if TNK offers an advantage over currently available treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death and a leading cause of adult disability in the United States and worldwide. To date, the only scientifically-proven and FDA-approved treatment for acute stroke is the clot-busting drug, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). A newer clot-busting drug, tenecteplase (TNK), has chemical properties that make it a potentially safer and more effective drug for treating stroke. Preliminary testing of TNK in patients with acute stroke has been encouraging enough to warrant further testing.

This study, TNK-S2B, will compare three different doses of TNK with standard tPA treatment in patients with acute stroke. Patients will be chosen randomly to receive either TNK or tPA. Neither the patient nor his/her doctor will know which medication the patient received until the study is completely finished.

The first part of the study will look at results of treatment in the first 24 hours to select the best dose of TNK to carry forward into a more detailed comparison with standard tPA treatment. After at least 100-150 pairs of the best dose of TNK and tPA patients have been enrolled, entry into the study will pause, and the outcomes at 3 months after stroke will be compared to see if the results of TNK treatment are sufficiently promising as an improvement over standard treatment to justify expanding the study to find a definitive answer.

The study, which will be conducted in at least 8 large medical centers, is expected to last about 3 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

tenecteplase

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tenecteplase

Intervention Type DRUG

This study will compare 3 different doses of tenecteplase to tPA.

2

tissue plasminogen activator, tPA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

tissue plasminogen activator, tPA

Intervention Type DRUG

To date, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is the only scientifically-proven and FDA-approved treatment for acute stroke.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tenecteplase

This study will compare 3 different doses of tenecteplase to tPA.

Intervention Type DRUG

tissue plasminogen activator, tPA

To date, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is the only scientifically-proven and FDA-approved treatment for acute stroke.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TNK tPA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with at least a serious, measurable deficit on the NIH Stroke Scale in language (aphasia score \> 1), motor power (arm or leg \> 1), vision (best visual score \> 2), or attention (attention score \> 2). Thus eligible patients may have a minimum total score of 1 if the deficit is in language or motor power. There is no maximum score that is exclusionary; even patients with severe hemispheric or brainstem deficits will be eligible, as is current practice with intravenous rt-PA. Patients with all ischemic stroke types and in all vascular distributions are eligible.
* Must arrive at participating hospital and treatment begun within 3 hours of the onset of symptoms. Patients awakening with new symptoms must use the time last observed to be normal and awake and the total time cannot exceed three hours prior to treatment as the time of onset.
* Must be 18 years of age or older.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a) minor stroke symptoms (e.g., sensory loss, ataxia, dysarthria, or facial weakness alone) or b) major symptoms which are rapidly improving by the time of treatment.
* Patients for whom a complete NIH Stroke Score cannot be obtained (e.g., intubated patients or complete amputees).
* Patients with evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on pretreatment CT scan.
* Patients with a clinical presentation that suggests subarachnoid hemorrhage, even if the initial CT scan is normal.
* Patients who are known or suspected to be pregnant.
* Patients with a known bleeding diathesis or patients with a platelet count \< 100,000. For patients who are taking oral Warfarin (Coumadin), the results of the pretreatment International Normalized Ratio (INR) must be available prior to treatment and must be
* \</= 1.4. Patients who have received heparin within 48 hours must have a normal partial thromboplastin time (PTT) to be eligible. Patients who have received low molecular weight heparin or heparinoid within 24 hours are also excluded.
* Patients with major surgery or serious trauma excluding head trauma within 14 days or serious head trauma within 3 months.
* Patients with a history of gastrointestinal or urinary tract hemorrhage in the previous 21 days.
* Patients with an arterial puncture at a non-compressible site or a lumbar puncture in the previous 7 days.
* Patients who, on repeated measurement, have a systolic blood pressure \> 185, or a diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mmHg when treatment is to begin, or require aggressive treatment to reduce blood pressure to within these limits.
* Patients with a history of stroke in the previous 3 months or have ever had an intracranial hemorrhage considered to put them at increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage.
* Patients with a serious medical illness likely to interfere with treatment or treatment might adversely affect that illness.
* Patients with abnormal blood glucose thought to account for the neurological deficit.
* Patients with a clinical presentation consistent with acute myocardial infarction or patients with presentation suggesting post-myocardial infarction pericarditis.
* Patients with a seizure at onset of stroke thought to be presenting with post-ictal paralysis mimicking stroke.
* Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations.
* Patients who have received any other investigational drug within 14 days.
* Patients who have large areas (greater than one lobe) of obvious low density on the baseline CT scan will be presumed to have had ongoing cerebral ischemia for greater than 3 hours, and will, therefore, be excluded. Patients with subtle early signs of cerebral infarction (e.g., sulcal effacement, blurring of the grey-white junction, asymmetry of the basal ganglia, insular ribbon sign, and others) and the dense artery sign on baseline CT scan will be eligible. Similarly, evidence of previous remote cerebral infarction on baseline CT will not be exclusionary.
* Patients for whom informed consent cannot be obtained.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

E. Clarke Haley

Professor, Department of Neurology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

E. Clarke Haley, Jr., M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinical Coordinating Center, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia Health System

John L. P. Thompson, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Statistical Analysis Center, Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California at San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Neurological Institutes

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins-Bayview Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Long Island Jewish Hospital

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University, Statistical Analysis Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Texas at Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia Health System

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Haley EC Jr, Thompson JL, Grotta JC, Lyden PD, Hemmen TG, Brown DL, Fanale C, Libman R, Kwiatkowski TG, Llinas RH, Levine SR, Johnston KC, Buchsbaum R, Levy G, Levin B; Tenecteplase in Stroke Investigators. Phase IIB/III trial of tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke: results of a prematurely terminated randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):707-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572040. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20185783 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01NS045170

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01NS037666

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

11231

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial 2
NCT03854500 TERMINATED PHASE3