Optimal Approach for Analysis of Case-Control Genetic Association Studies
NCT ID: NCT00241709
Last Updated: 2013-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2005-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Genetics of Asthma and Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness
NCT00005359
Collaborative Studies on the Genetics of Asthma (CSGA)
NCT00005500
Gender Differences and SNPs in Asthmatic Patients
NCT04567212
Observational Study of Advanced Data Analytics in Genetic Conditions
NCT05657405
United States Hypophosphatasia Molecular Research Center
NCT05062629
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In racially admixed populations, genetic associations may be confounded by population stratification. To control for population stratification, statistical methods that use marker genotype data to infer population structure have been proposed as an alternative to family-based tests of association. However, there are limited empirical data on how these methods perform in real populations. This study will use well characterized populations of Mexican and Puerto Rican asthmatics, their parents, and control subjects recruited from the same sites to examine the effectiveness of approaches to correct for the effects of population stratification on case-control genetic association studies.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
This study has three specific aims: 1) To test and compare methods of detecting and correcting for population stratification, the study will genotype a total of 100 ancestral informative markers (AIMs) for 400 asthma cases and an equal number of control subjects. These AIMs will then be used with three statistical methods developed to detect and correct for population stratification. The number and characteristics of markers required to correct false positive associations between AIMs, asthma, and asthma quantitative traits will be evaluated and compared; 2) To compare the power of genomically adjusted case-control studies to the Transmission Disequilibrium Test (TDT). An allele from each of the 100 AIMs will be considered as a risk factor for a simulated "phenotype." The association between phenotypes and each AIM will be tested with the TDT and with a case-control analysis after adjustment for stratification to compare the false negative rates for these study designs. 3) To use the results from aim 1 and 2 to define an optimal approach for analysis and interpretation of case-control association studies in these populations and apply this approach to analyze the association between asthma and a series of candidate genes. The results of these studies should provide important insights into optimal methods to control for population stratification in case-control association studies, thereby facilitating the inclusion of admixed populations in future genetic studies of complex diseases such as asthma.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
FAMILY_BASED
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
8 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1309
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.