Medical Research Council (MRC) Working Party on Leukaemia in Children UK National Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) Trial: UKALL 2003
NCT ID: NCT00222612
Last Updated: 2010-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
2100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-10-31
2013-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Can treatment be reduced without compromising efficacy in a MRD-defined low risk group?
2. Does further post-remission intensification improve outcome for a MRD-defined high risk group?
3. Measure the Quality of Life impact of the different treatment arms on the children and their families.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hormone Therapy Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NCT00003437
The Pediatric Acute Leukemia (PedAL) Screening Trial - A Study to Test Bone Marrow and Blood in Children With Leukemia That Has Come Back After Treatment or Is Difficult to Treat - A Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and Children's Oncology Group Study
NCT04726241
Study of Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Who Were Enrolled as Children on Clinical Trials EORTC-58741, EORTC-58831, EORTC-58832, or EORTC-58881 Between 1971 and 1998
NCT01298388
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia
NCT00002499
Optimal Methods of Disease Detection in Children and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Pediatric Oncology Branch
NCT03627208
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be assigned to MRD risk groups based on day 29 and post consolidation MRD results and randomised as follows:
1. MRD Low Risk Group (MRD negative at day 29 and week 11 or positive \<1 x 10-4 at day 28 and negative at week 11) will continue on previously assigned Regimens (A or B) but randomised between two delayed intensifications and one delayed intensification.
2. MRD High Risk Group (MRD positive \> 1 x 10-4 at day 29) randomised between previously assigned Regimen (A or B) and Regimen C.
3. MRD Indeterminate Group (No MRD result or MRD positive \<1 x 10-4 at day 29 and at week 11) will continue on previously assigned Regimen (A or B) and received two delayed intensifications
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A or B with 2DI
3 or 4 drug induction plus 2 delayed intensifications
Standard childhood UK ALL protocol
No additional treatment to standard protocol.
C plus 2DI
Intensified treatment including Capizzi maintenance
Intensified treatment including Capizzi maintenance
Augmented consolidation: vincristine, Peg-asparaginase. Capizzi maintenance: iv methotrexate and peg-asparaginase
A or B with 1DI
Reduced intensity treatment
Reduced intensification
Deletion of one 7 week treatment block containing dexamethasone, vincristine, doxorubicin, Peg-asparaginase, intrathecal methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reduced intensification
Deletion of one 7 week treatment block containing dexamethasone, vincristine, doxorubicin, Peg-asparaginase, intrathecal methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine.
Standard childhood UK ALL protocol
No additional treatment to standard protocol.
Intensified treatment including Capizzi maintenance
Augmented consolidation: vincristine, Peg-asparaginase. Capizzi maintenance: iv methotrexate and peg-asparaginase
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Standard or Intermediate Risk as defined above.
2. Morphological Complete Remission (BM1 Marrow) at Day 29 of Induction.
3. Availability of MRD results at Day 28 and after consolidation therapy.
4. Informed consent obtained.
5. Induction given as protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Children with B-ALL (Burkitt-like, t(8;14), L3 morphology, SMIg positive). Patients with this disease will be eligible for the current UKCCSG B cell NHL/ALL trial.
3. Children with Philadelphia-positive ALL (t(9;22) or BCR/ABL positive) will start induction therapy on this protocol but transfer to the European Intergroup Protocol as soon as their Philadelphia status is known.
Initially, eligible patients will be stratified into three risk groups based on the following criteria:
1. Standard risk: all children \>1\<10 years with a highest white cell count before starting treatment of \<50x109/l, and who do not have BCR-ABL, hypodiploidy (≥44 chromosomes), or an MLL gene rearrangement.
2. Intermediate risk: all children ≥10 years old, or with a diagnostic WBC ≥50x109/l (or both) and who do not have BCR-ABL, hypodiploidy (≥44 chromosomes), or an MLL gene rearrangement.
3. High Risk: all children, irrespective of initial risk category, who have a slow early response (SER) as defined below - see section 6 - together with those who have BCR-ABL (induction only), hypodiploidy (≥44 chromosomes), or an MLL gene rearrangement. These patients will not be eligible for MRD randomisation.
Patients will then start treatment according to their risk group as follows:
1. Standard risk, (around 60-65% of the total): regimen A - three-drug induction.
2. Intermediate risk, (around 20- 30% of the total): regimen B - four-drug induction.
3. High risk (around 10-12% of the total): These patients will not be eligible for MRD randomisation. They will be allocated regimen C - four drug induction, augmented BFM consolidation, Capizzi interim maintenance, and two further BFM-style intensification periods of extended duration.
1. High Risk as defined above. These patients will receive Regimen C.
2. Day 28 non-remitters. These patients will receive Regimen C if BM2 or go off-protocol if BM3 (see below for definitions of BM2 and BM3).
3. MRD Indeterminate Group (No result or MRD positive \< 1 x 10-4 at day 28 and after consolidation therapy) will continue on previously assigned therapy.
4. Sub-optimal induction therapy. The clinical significance of day 28 MRD is uncertain in patients who have received sub-optimal induction therapy. Please discuss these patients with a co-ordinator.
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical Research Council
OTHER_GOV
University of Oxford
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sheffield University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ajay Vora
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moorman AV, Antony G, Wade R, Butler ER, Enshaei A, Harrison CJ, Moppett J, Hough R, Rowntree C, Hancock J, Goulden N, Samarasinghe S, Vora A. Time to Cure for Childhood and Young Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Is Independent of Early Risk Factors: Long-Term Follow-Up of the UKALL2003 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 20;40(36):4228-4239. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00245. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
Wilson K, Case M, Minto L, Bailey S, Bown N, Jesson J, Lawson S, Vormoor J, Irving J. Flow minimal residual disease monitoring of candidate leukemic stem cells defined by the immunophenotype, CD34+CD38lowCD19+ in B-lineage childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2010 Apr;95(4):679-83. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.011726. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UKALL2003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.