The Prolonged Use of Topiramate for Preventing Migraine Headaches

NCT ID: NCT00216619

Last Updated: 2014-07-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

834 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-11-30

Study Completion Date

2006-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness (beyond 6 months) of individualized doses (100 to 200 milligrams) of topiramate for the prevention of migraine headaches over a period of 26 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Previous studies have shown that topiramate is effective in preventing migraine headaches. This study will start with a 4-week baseline period in which no treatment is given, followed by a 26-week period in which each patient's dose is adjusted and then kept stable for 4 weeks. The dose will start at 25 milligrams of topiramate per day and will be increased 25 milligrams per day once weekly and then raised to either the target--100 milligrams per day--or the maximum dose that is well tolerated up to 200 milligrams per day. Patients randomized to receive topiramate will remain on that dose. The comparison phase of the study is a 26-week period in which the change in migraine days of patients on topiramate (taking at least 50 milligrams per day) is compared with the change in migraine days for patients on the placebo. Also studied will be the patients' health-related quality of life as assessed by questionnaires filled out at specific visits as well as the patients' views of the safety and tolerability of topiramate. The study hypothesis is that the number of migraine days, periods, and attacks during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind phase, relative to the last 4 weeks of the open-label phase, is reduced more in the topiramate group than the placebo group. During open-label (26-weeks) and double-blind phase (26-weeks), patients receiving topiramate will take 25 milligrams to 100 milligrams daily by mouth; increased by 25 milligrams per day once weekly; dose cannot exceed 200 milligrams per day and must be stable for the last 4 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open Label Phase

Topiramate treatment started with one tablet per day, taken in the evening, for the first 7 days of the OL phase. Each tablet contained 25 mg topiramate. After one week, the dose was raised to two tablets per day: one tablet was taken in the morning, the other in the evening. Until Week 26

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Topiramate

Intervention Type DRUG

topiramate treatment started with one tablet per day, taken in the evening, for the first 7 days of the OL phase. Each tablet contained 25 mg topiramate. After one week, the dose was raised to two tablets per day: one tablet was taken in the morning, the other in the evening.

Double Blind and Roll Out Phase

the trial medication consisted of topiramate 25 mg tablets or matching placebo tablets which were identical in appearance, taste and smell. DB randomisation phase (after the 26-weeks OL phase) were randomly allocated (1:1) to one of the two treatment groups (topiramate or placebo). The randomisation took place at Visit 6 (Week 26).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Topiramate

Intervention Type DRUG

topiramate treatment started with one tablet per day, taken in the evening, for the first 7 days of the OL phase. Each tablet contained 25 mg topiramate. After one week, the dose was raised to two tablets per day: one tablet was taken in the morning, the other in the evening.

Topiramate - Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

the trial medication consisted of topiramate 25 mg tablets or matching placebo tablets which were identical in appearance, taste and smell. DB randomisation phase (after the 26-weeks OL phase) were randomly allocated (1:1) to one of the two treatment groups (topiramate or placebo). The randomisation took place at Visit 6 (Week 26)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Topiramate

topiramate treatment started with one tablet per day, taken in the evening, for the first 7 days of the OL phase. Each tablet contained 25 mg topiramate. After one week, the dose was raised to two tablets per day: one tablet was taken in the morning, the other in the evening.

Intervention Type DRUG

Topiramate - Placebo

the trial medication consisted of topiramate 25 mg tablets or matching placebo tablets which were identical in appearance, taste and smell. DB randomisation phase (after the 26-weeks OL phase) were randomly allocated (1:1) to one of the two treatment groups (topiramate or placebo). The randomisation took place at Visit 6 (Week 26)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Established history of migraine for at least one year;
* Migraine meets HIS (International Headache Society) criteria
* An average of at least 4 monthly migraine days during the 3 months preceding trial entry

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient used migraine prophylactic medication in the month prior to trial entry (flunarizine: 3 months prior to entry)
* Patient had failed (lack of efficacy) more than two adequate previous regimens of migraine prophylactic medications
* Patient had a history of severe drug allergy or hypersensitivity
* Patient overused analgesics, opiates, ergots and/or triptans
* Patient had been using topiramate regularly
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liÿge, , Belgium

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Hradec nad Svitavou, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Aabenraa, , Denmark

Site Status

Esbjerg, , Denmark

Site Status

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Kÿbenhavn K, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Colombes, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Voiron, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Mÿnster, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest Na, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged Na, , Hungary

Site Status

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Bodø, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow Malopolska, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Mosina Poland, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan Poland, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Maribor, , Slovenia

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Biel/Bienne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Bursa, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Helensburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Northampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sunderland, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Surrey, , United Kingdom

Site Status

York, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Bulgaria Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Norway Poland Portugal Russia Saudi Arabia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Diener HC, Agosti R, Allais G, Bergmans P, Bussone G, Davies B, Ertas M, Lanteri-Minet M, Reuter U, Sanchez Del Rio M, Schoenen J, Schwalen S, van Oene J; TOPMAT-MIG-303 Investigators Group. Cessation versus continuation of 6-month migraine preventive therapy with topiramate (PROMPT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Dec;6(12):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70272-7. Epub 2007 Nov 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17988947 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://filehosting.pharmacm.com/DownloadService.ashx?client=CTR_JNJ_6051&studyid=387&filename=CR003931_CSR.pdf

A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate in prolonged migraine prevention.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-000321-29

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TOPMAT-MIG-303

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR003931

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.