Comparison of Esophageal and Anorectal Manometry Catheters
NCT ID: NCT00204763
Last Updated: 2008-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-01-31
2007-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Connected Catheter- Safety and Effectiveness Study
NCT03843073
Comparison of Air Charged Catheters With Water Filled Catheters for Urodynamic Study
NCT02030340
Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Perigee and Apogee Mesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Versus Gynecare Prolift
NCT03070873
Point-of-care Anorectal Testing to Predict Outcomes With Biofeedback Therapy: Clinical Trial
NCT04159350
Measurement of Bladder Pressure With a Novel External Device, Comparison to Urodynamics Testing
NCT03456089
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Five subjects with the diagnosis of incontinence previously referred for clinical anorectal motility testing will be contacted. These five subjects must have previously undergone anorectal manometry using the standard clinical protocol for an anorectal manometry study with water perfused anorectal manometry catheters. After obtaining informed consent, these five subjects will undergo the anorectal manometry using air-filled balloon catheters per the standard clinical protocol. Following the repeat procedure a short one-page questionnaire will be completed by the subject and the motility nurse.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
2
Solid state catheter
Solid state catheter
The standardly used solid state catheter will be tested against the new air filled balloon catheter
A
Air filled balloon catheter
The new air filled balloon catheter will be tested against the solid state catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Air filled balloon catheter
The new air filled balloon catheter will be tested against the solid state catheter
Solid state catheter
The standardly used solid state catheter will be tested against the new air filled balloon catheter
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to give informed consent
* No significant medical conditions
* Abnormal esophageal motility
* Abnormal anorectal motility
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinical Innovations
INDUSTRY
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Utah
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John C Fang, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Utah HSC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah HSC
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fang JC, Hilden K, Tuteja AK, Peterson KA. Comparison of air-coupled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters with solid-state esophageal manometry and water-perfused anorectal manometry catheters. Dig Dis Sci. 2004 Oct;49(10):1657-63. doi: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000043382.59539.d3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12127
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.