Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Localised Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00193921
Last Updated: 2014-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
82 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-02-28
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis(es) to be tested:
1. Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy is superior to gemcitabine + high dose palliative radiotherapy in terms of efficacy in a multi-institutional setting
2. Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy is superior to gemcitabine + high dose palliative radiotherapy in terms of feasibility in a multi-institutional setting
3. Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy has a favourable toxicity profile relative to gemcitabine + high-dose palliative radiotherapy
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiation Therapy With or Without Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Stage I, Stage II, or Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00253591
Combination Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00004093
Radiation Therapy Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01134861
Study of Vinorelbine and Cisplatin as Induction Therapy With Radiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable NSCLC
NCT02709720
Oral Vinorelbine and Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiotherapy After Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced NSCLC.
NCT00295672
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Radical radiation is not feasible for all patients with unresectable Stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, based upon the extent of the loco-regional disease or the medical state of the patient. Patients of good performance status receiving protracted high-dose palliative radiotherapy do obtain a survival benefit from this therapy. Studies have shown a survival advantage by adding chemotherapy to radical radiation therapy: but studies in the high-dose palliative radiotherapy setting are lacking. Two regimens of concurrent chemotherapy with high-dose palliative radiotherapy have been developed locally, with established MTDs. These 2 regimens do warrant a comparative assessment in a phase II trial, prior to a phase III trial against high dose palliative radiation alone (36Gy/12#/5).
This is a randomised phase II trial comprising of 2 arms for randomization as follows:
Arm A:External beam radiation, 40 Gy/20#/5 per week, Plus concurrent Vinorelbine, IV, 25mg/m2, days 1, 8, 22 and + Cisplatin 20mg/m2, IV, weekly
Arm B:External beam radiation, 30 Gy/15#/5 per week, Plus concurrentGemcitabine, 200mg (flat dose) IV days 1, 8, 15
An equal number of patients will be randomised to each arm. The randomisation will be carried out by the Princess Alexandra Trial Centre.
Patients will be assessed at baseline, weekly during treatment, and then at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post treatment then 3 monthly thereafter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Vinorelbine + cisplatin + high-dose palliative radiotherapy
Vinorelbine
IV, 25mg/m2, days 1, 8, 22
High dose Radiotherapy
External beam radiation, 40 Gy/20#/5 per week
Cisplatin
20mg/m2, IV, weekly
B
Gemcitabine + high-dose palliative radiotherapy
Gemcitabine
200mg (flat dose) IV days 1, 8, 15
High Dose Radiotherapy
External beam radiation, 30 Gy/15#/5 per week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vinorelbine
IV, 25mg/m2, days 1, 8, 22
High dose Radiotherapy
External beam radiation, 40 Gy/20#/5 per week
Gemcitabine
200mg (flat dose) IV days 1, 8, 15
Cisplatin
20mg/m2, IV, weekly
High Dose Radiotherapy
External beam radiation, 30 Gy/15#/5 per week
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planned high dose palliative radiation therapy for locoregional control. Examples include patients with:
1. Stage I - IIIB disease with
* disease technically unsuitable for radical therapy, or · weight loss in excess of 10%, or
* concurrent medical illness
2. Patients found to have a locally advanced thoracic disease suitable for radical therapy but on work up are found to have a FDG-PET only solitary metastasis.
* All potential patients, prior to registration, must be reviewed at a multidisciplinary lung oncology meeting attended by medical oncologists, radiation oncologists and radiologists.
* No prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
* ECOG performance status 0, 1.
* Adequate hepatic, bone marrow and renal function.
* If patient is female of child bearing potential, she must not be pregnant or lactating. Males and females of reproductive potential must practise adequate contraception.
* Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant medical conditions which in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the planned delivery of the chemotherapy and radiotherapy or which may be potentially exacerbated by these modalities.
* History of any other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) unless in complete remission and off all therapy for that cancer for at least 5 years.
* Receiving treatment with another investigational agent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cancer Council Queensland
OTHER
Victorian Cancer Council
UNKNOWN
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Michael
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
Bryan Burmeister
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Mater Misericordiae Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
North Queensland Oncology Service
Townsville, Queensland, Australia
The John Flynn Hospital
Tugun, Queensland, Australia
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Border Medical Oncology
Wondonga, Victoria, Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here for more information about this study on the TROG official website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PMCC Protocol No. 03/85
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TROG 03.07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.