A Study of Children With Refractory or Relapsed ALL

NCT ID: NCT00187083

Last Updated: 2008-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-02-28

Study Completion Date

2003-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main purpose of this study is to find out which form of asparaginase (the native E. coli/Erwinia) or PEG-asparaginase) is more effective during induction treatment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia that has come back after treatment (relapsed) or is resistant to treatment (refractory)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The present protocol will compare the biologic effects of PEG-asparaginase vs native-forms of asparaginase in a randomized trial using the same dosages and schedules used in the POG 9411 study. Comprehensive studies, including the measurement of antibodies and asparagine levels as well as the pharmacokinetics of L-asparaginase, will be performed. This protocol will also study the changes in topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II levels and the fractions of topoisomerase I/II translocations in malignant lymphoblasts after upfront window topotecan therapy, and correlate oncolytic response with these changes.

Secondary objectives include:

* To compare changes in asparagine levels 28 days after initiation of treatment with asparaginase between the two groups.
* To estimate the pharmacokinetics of L-asparaginase, compare the pharmacokinetics between the two groups of patients, and correlate the pharmacokinetics with the development of antibody to asparaginase and depletion of asparagine.
* To measure the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients with recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia
* To determine whether the frequency of recombinogenesis in lymphocytes is increased during or after etoposide therapy relative to the pre-therapy level, and to explore whether etoposide pharmacokinetics are related to the Day 7 or post-therapy level of recombinogenesis.

Detailed Description of Treatment Plan

WINDOW Topotecan 2.4 mg/m2 ; IV over 30 min in 5 doses Days 1-5

STANDARD INDUCTION Dexamethasone 6 mg/m2/day orally Days 8-35 Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2.0 mg) days 8, 15, 22, 29

RANDOMIZE E. coli asparaginase 10,000 U/m2/day IM (or Erwinia if previous allergy to E. coli) Days 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, 29, 32, 34

OR

PEG-Asparaginase 2500 U/m2/day IM Days 8, 15, 22, 29

ITHMA Days 8, 22, 36

CONSOLIDATION

Fludarabine: 15 mg/m2 IV over 30 min; days 1,2,3,4 Ara-C: 2 g/m2 IV days 1,2,3,4

Patients who achieve remission on R16 induction or consolidation may be eligible for either a matched sibling or a fully matched/one-antigen-mismatched unrelated donor transplant

For patients not undergoing bone marrow transplant:

SECONDARY CONSOLIDATION

VP 16: 50 mg/m2 PO qd for 14 days. Vincristine: 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2.0 mg) IV; days 1, 8. IT MHA day 1

CONTINUATION CHEMOTHERAPY

Cycle 1:

Cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 IV on days 1 and 2 Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (max 2.0 mg)

Cycle 2:

VP-16 50 mg/m2 day PO daily x 14 days Decadron 6 mg/m2 PO daily ) TID x 14 days Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV (max 2 mg) on days 1 and 8.

Cycle 3:

HD MTX 5 gm/m2 continuous infusion over 24 hrs E. coli Asparaginase 10,000 U/m2/dose IM qod x3 or PEG Asparaginase 2500 U/m2/dose IM x 1 (maintain same randomization for Asparaginase preparation as during induction)

Cycle 4:

High Dose Ara-C 2 g/m2/dose IV over 2 hrs q 12 hrs x 3 doses.\[Total dose 6 gm/m2\] Idarubicin 12 mg/m2 IV over 30 min X 1 \[after completion of first dose of Ara-C\] IT MHA on day 1 prior to the HDARA-C (dose of ITMHA is age adjusted as outlined in section 7.3)

STANDARD CONTINUATION CHEMOTHERAPY

Patients will receive 4-week rotational cycles of chemotherapy with the following pairs of drugs for total treatment duration of 17 months.

Week #1 Cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 IV) + VCR (1.5 mg/m2 IV; max 2 mg). Week #2 VM26 (200 mg/m2 IV) + Ara C (300 mg/m2 IV). Week #3 MTX (MTX should be given IM or as a 2 hr IV infusion if the patient has had previous cranial iradiation) (40 mg/m2 IV/IM) + 6 MP (75 mg/m2 PO q HS x 7) Week #4 MTX (MTX should be given IM or as a 2 hr IV infusion if the patient has had previous cranial irradiation)(40 mg/m2 IV/IM) + 6 MP (75 mg/m2 PO q HS x 7)

IT MHA: Given every 8 weeks throughout standard continuation chemotherapy for patients with CNS 1 status Given every 4 weeks for patients with CNS 2/3 status who will receive CSI at the end of chemotherapy

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Leukemia Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Native asparaginase

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

erwinia asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposide

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, steroid therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

2

PEG-asparaginase

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

erwinia asparaginase

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposide

Intervention Type DRUG

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, steroid therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Topotecan, dexamethasone, vincristine

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Intervention Type DRUG

E. coli Asparaginase, PEG-L-asparaginase

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Intervention Type DRUG

erwinia asparaginase

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Intervention Type DRUG

fludarabine, methotrexate, mercaptopurine

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Intervention Type DRUG

idarubicin, etoposide, cytarbine, teniposide

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, steroid therapy

See Detailed Description section for details of treatment interventions.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For patients treated on frontline protocols at St. Jude:

* ALL in isolated bone marrow relapse, or combined marrow and extramedullary relapse, during or after treatment with multi-agent chemotherapy (TOTAL XI, XII, XIIIA, XIIIB), or isolated extramedullary relapse after treatment on TOTXII.
* Patients with recurrent T-Cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who relapse in the bone marrow with \>25% blasts

For patients not treated on front-line St. Jude protocols:

• ALL in isolated bone marrow relapse, or isolated extramedullary relapse, or combined marrow and extramedullary relapse.

All patients:

* First relapse after receiving primary therapy or during primary therapy
* Life expectance of at least 8 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

* Life expectancy \< 8 weeks
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sima Jeha, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ALLR16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id