A Double-Blind Comparison of Galantamine HBr and Placebo in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
NCT ID: NCT00181675
Last Updated: 2010-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-12-31
2003-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis 1: ADHD symptomatology in adults with DSM-IV ADHD will be responsive to acute Galantamine HBr treatment.
Hypothesis 2: Galantamine HBr -associated improvement in ADHD symptomatology in adults will translate into improved functional capacities (neuropsychological, social, and occupational) as well as an increased quality of life throughout acute treatment.
Hypothesis 3: Galantamine HBr treatment will be safe and well tolerated as reflected by a low drop out rate and absence of major differences from placebo.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Double-Blind Comparison of Concerta and Placebo in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
NCT00181571
Dose Finding Study in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)(174007/P05805/MK-8777-003)
NCT00610441
Efficacy and Safety Eval of Guanfacine Hydrochloride in Combination With Psychostimulants in Adults (18-65).
NCT02141113
Stimulant Drug Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD), Inattentive Type
NCT00824317
Behavioral Treatment, Drug Treatment, and Combined Treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
NCT00050622
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The proposed study includes 1) use of a 12-week design to document the response rate 2) assessment of the impact of Galantamine HBr on functional capacities (quality of life, psychosocial function) and cognition, 3) careful assessment of safety and tolerability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
galantamine HBr
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Females between 18 to 58 years of age (inclusive) that are on reliable and adequate birth control.
3. Subjects with the DSM-IV diagnosis of childhood onset Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), as manifested in the clinical evaluation and confirmed by structured interview.
4. Subjects with a score of 24 or greater on the ADHD Rating Scale.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Baseline Ham-D \> 16, BDI \> 19, and/or Ham-A \> 21.
3. Any clinically significant chronic medical condition, specifically cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, genitourinary, metabolic, or endocrine disorders, and hepatic or renal impairment.
4. Clinically significant abnormal baseline laboratory values.
5. I.Q. \<75.
6. Organic brain disorders.
7. Subjects with a history of or current seizure disorders.
8. Pregnant and/or nursing females.
9. Clinically unstable psychiatric conditions (i.e. suicidal behaviors, psychosis).
10. Subjects currently (within the past 6 months) known to abuse or to be dependent on any drug, including alcohol.
11. Subjects on other psychotropic medications, with the exception of SSRIs.
12. Subjects with a history of intolerance or non-response to cholinergic agents as determined by the clinician.
13. Subjects with a history of peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or other GI disorders.
14. Subjects with history of bradyarrythmias.
15. Subjects with asthma.
16. Subjects on ketoconazole.
18 Years
58 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph Biederman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2002-P-001937
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.