Written Asthma Actions Plans Versus No Written Instructions In Specialty Care
NCT ID: NCT00149461
Last Updated: 2014-01-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
407 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-09-30
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RCT of a Written Action Plan vs. Usual Care in Children With Acute Asthma
NCT00381355
Comparing Asthma Action Plans for Pediatric Asthma
NCT00136305
Improving Parent Understanding of Instructions About Asthma Care
NCT01405625
Accuracy of the Association Between the "PA-R" and "ACT" Questionnaires in Asthmatic Pediatric Patients
NCT06844266
Investigation of the Role of Pictorial Asthma Action Plans to Promote Self-management in Rural Youth With Asthma
NCT03187119
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Effective self-management of asthma requires that patients, or their caregivers, recognize the early symptoms of an exacerbation and initiate appropriate interventions aimed at preventing the progression of symptoms. Most asthma clinical guidelines suggest that the incorporation of a written self-management plan is essential. Patients must possess, understand, and follow a written plan if they are to respond appropriately to changes in asthma status. Nevertheless, there are no controlled studies examining the efficacy of the written plan itself. Furthermore, even if written plans are an essential and effective component of successful self-management, the data suggest that few patients receive these plans. If patients and physicians are to increase their use of written plans, the barriers to the use of these plans need further investigation.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The three primary outcome measures of this study are as follows: 1) reduction in asthma symptom frequency; 2) reduction in urgent, unscheduled, and emergency visits for asthma; and 3) improved quality of life. These outcomes will be measured over a 12-month period.
The following four secondary outcome measures will also be examined: 1) hospitalizations due to asthma; 2) days with activity restriction; 3) the proportion of patients in the intervention group who are given the model written plan form during the initial visit; and 4) the proportion of patients in the intervention group who have the model treatment plan at the end of the follow-up period. These outcomes will be measured over a 12-month period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Written Asthma Action Plan Group
Participants randomized to the written asthma action plan group received an asthma action plan form along with asthma education from their specialist physician.
Written Asthma Action Plan
No Written Instructions Group
Participants randomized to the usual care group received no written instructions other than prescriptions from their specialist physician.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Written Asthma Action Plan
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of persistent asthma (as defined by NHLBI guidelines)
* All participants are new patients to the practice
* Had never been seen by a specialist physician for asthma care
* Had never received a written asthma action plan
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell
UNKNOWN
Harlem Hospital Center
OTHER
Jacobi Medical Center
OTHER
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Evans PhD
Professor of Emeritus of Clinical Sociomedical Sciences (In Pediatrics)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Evans, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Columbia University
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sheares BJ, Du Y, Vazquez TL, Mellins RB, Evans D. Use of written treatment plans for asthma by specialist physicians. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007 Apr;42(4):348-56. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20586.
Sheares BJ, Mellins RB, Dimango E, Serebrisky D, Zhang Y, Bye MR, Dovey ME, Nachman S, Hutchinson V, Evans D. Do Patients of Subspecialist Physicians Benefit from Written Asthma Action Plans? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jun 15;191(12):1374-83. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1338OC.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.