Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Research Study to See if a Change in Therapy for HIV Infection Can Improve the Immune Response to Treatment (NCT NCT00145795)
NCT ID: NCT00145795
Last Updated: 2022-06-15
Results Overview
Immune reconstitution is defined as the absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 3 months of therapy. Absolute CD4+ T cell count, our measure of immune recovery, was assessed in the clinical laboratory using fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies to the CD4 on lymphocytes. This is the main target cell for HIV infection. The absolute CD4+ T cell count is also the only clinically validated surrogate marker of immune dysfunction in HIV. CD4+ count is also our best predictor of morbidity and mortality outcomes.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
3 months
2022-06-15
Participant Flow
Patients were enrolled from the outpatient clinics at the University of Chicago and the University of Illinois, with approval from the Institutional Review Board at each institution.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
9
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Research Study to See if a Change in Therapy for HIV Infection Can Improve the Immune Response to Treatment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=10 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
Total
n=20 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=5 Participants
|
40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=7 Participants
|
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
CD4 T cell count/mm^3
|
172 number of cells per cubic mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 89 • n=5 Participants
|
264 number of cells per cubic mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 106 • n=7 Participants
|
218 number of cells per cubic mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 95.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Immune response at enrollment
Nonresponder
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Immune response at enrollment
Partial responder
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Immune response at enrollment
Complete responder
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of HAART prior to study entry
|
28.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.4 • n=5 Participants
|
38.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.8 • n=7 Participants
|
33.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
HAART regimen at enrollment
Two NRTIs + NNRTI
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HAART regimen at enrollment
Two NRTIs + PI
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HAART regimen at enrollment
Two NRTIs + boosted PI
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HAART regimen at enrollment
Three NRTIs
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsImmune reconstitution is defined as the absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 3 months of therapy. Absolute CD4+ T cell count, our measure of immune recovery, was assessed in the clinical laboratory using fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies to the CD4 on lymphocytes. This is the main target cell for HIV infection. The absolute CD4+ T cell count is also the only clinically validated surrogate marker of immune dysfunction in HIV. CD4+ count is also our best predictor of morbidity and mortality outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Immune Reconstitution [3 Months]
|
41.56 cells per cubic millimeter
Standard Deviation 34.84
|
49.40 cells per cubic millimeter
Standard Deviation 92.41
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsImmune reconstitution is defined as the absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count after 6 months of therapy. Absolute CD4+ T cell count, our measure of immune recovery, was assessed in the clinical laboratory using fluorescent labeled monoclonal antibodies to the CD4 on lymphocytes. This is the main target cell for HIV infection. The absolute CD4+ T cell count is also the only clinically validated surrogate marker of immune dysfunction in HIV. CD4+ count is also our best predictor of morbidity and mortality outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Immune Reconstitution [6 Months]
|
116 cells per cubic millimeter
Standard Deviation 108
|
32 cells per cubic millimeter
Standard Deviation 49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsEx vivo T cell apoptosis can be assessed many different ways. The use of propidium iodide staining to determine the proportion of isolated cells that have undergone apoptosis after ex vivo incubation is a standard method that has been used by many investigators. Apoptotic cells intercalate less PI into their DNA, and on flow cytometry, this cell population is identified by a decrease in mean fluorescence (shift to the left). We have experience with this assay, and we have published on the use of method for determining rates of ex vivo apoptosis for different immune effector cells.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ Memory Cell Population [3 Months]
|
15.27 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
24.53 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 13.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsEx vivo T cell apoptosis can be assessed many different ways. The use of propidium iodide staining to determine the proportion of isolated cells that have undergone apoptosis after ex vivo incubation is a standard method that has been used by many investigators. Apoptotic cells intercalate less PI into their DNA, and on flow cytometry, this cell population is identified by a decrease in mean fluorescence (shift to the left). We have experience with this assay, and we have published on the use of method for determining rates of ex vivo apoptosis for different immune effector cells.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ naïve Cell Population [3 Months]
|
16.60 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
22.53 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 13.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ Memory Cell Population [6 Months]
|
14.10 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 5.53
|
17.94 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 9.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD4+ naïve Cell Population [6 Months]
|
10.03 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
18.92 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 10.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD8+ Cell Population [3 Months]
|
20.92 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 6.63
|
16.74 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 7.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsOutcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of ex Vivo T Cell Apoptosis: CD8+ Cell Population [6 Months]
|
17.07 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 9.38
|
19.01 percent apoptosis
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsNumber of participants experiencing clinical HIV-related events as defined by category A, category B, and Appendix B in the "1993 Revised Classification System for HIV Infection and Expanded Surveillance Case Definition for AIDS Among Adolescents and Adults" (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00018871.htm).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical HIV-related Events
|
0 number of participants with event(s)
|
0 number of participants with event(s)
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsVirologic failure defined as HIV RNA \> 2,000 copies/mL
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=9 Participants
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 Participants
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rates of Virologic Failure
|
0 percentage of randomized subjects
|
0 percentage of randomized subjects
|
Adverse Events
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
Current Regimen
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone
n=10 participants at risk
Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.
|
Current Regimen
n=10 participants at risk
Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea dyspepsia
|
10.0%
1/10 • 0-6 months
|
0.00%
0/10 • 0-6 months
|
Additional Information
Dr. David Pitrak
The University of Chicago Department of Health Studies, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place