A Research Study to See if a Change in Therapy for HIV Infection Can Improve the Immune Response to Treatment

NCT ID: NCT00145795

Last Updated: 2022-06-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our goal is to determine if a change in therapy to one containing Kaletra can improve the immune response in patients who have previously been immune partial responders or non-responders. We also are interested in knowing if this agent improves immune response by affecting cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) + T cell death (apoptosis) or by further inhibiting (preventing) ongoing, low-level, viral replication to levels below detection by current viral load measurements. This will help us understand why immune responses to effective antiretroviral therapy are so different and help determine some possible guidelines for managing patients with poor immune responses.

Hypothesis: Patients with poor immune responses to HAART who receive Kaletra in place of their current PI or Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) while continuing their current 2 NRTI backbone will have improved immune response to therapy compared to patients who continue their current regimen.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To our knowledge our study is the first study showing persistent apoptosis in a subgroup of patients with complete viral suppression in association with poor immune recovery. Immune alterations independent of active viral replication may be responsible. Recent data suggests that immune responses to antiretroviral therapy depend on residual or restored thymic function. Improved CD4+ counts in patients despite virologic treatment failure are associated with greater thymic function, while poor T cell responses despite suppression of HIV are seen with decreased thymic function. Discordant immune responses may also be due to differential effects of particular antiretroviral agents on T cell apoptosis independent of viral suppression. For example, protease inhibitors have been shown to decrease rates of apoptosis of uninfected T cells. Viral replication is never completely suppressed with HAART, even when patients have undetectable plasma HIV RNA. Therefore, varying degrees of low level viral replication or replication in certain cellular compartments may continue to drive T cell apoptosis. Finally, our data suggests that ex vivo rates of Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) apoptosis could potentially be used predict immune recovery or identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from changes in HAART or adjunctive immunomodulatory therapies.

At this time, although there are excellent guidelines for how to evaluate and change therapy for patients with virologic failure, there are no recommendation and little data on approaches or strategies to change therapy for patients with poor immune responses. Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) may be of benefit to patients with poor immune responses to HAART despite viral suppression. Kaletra may have greater potency and better suppression of viral replication that is below the level of detection by plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HIV-1 RNA. Kaletra also has an excellent pharmacokinetic profile which may result in superior inhibition of T cell apoptosis in vivo.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone

Patients in this arm received Kaletra in addition to their current Dual NRTI Backbone.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone

Intervention Type DRUG

Current Regimen

Patients in this study arm continued their current regimen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Current Regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Kaletra + Current Dual NRTI Backbone

Intervention Type DRUG

Current Regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) + Current Dual NRTI Backbone Current HIV treatment regimen

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HIV Infection documented CD4+ count within the last 30 days (or drawn with screening labs)
* Currently on a stable 3-drug HAART regimen including 2 NRTIs for \> 6 month viral load (VL) \< 50/mm3 for \> 6 months, last within the last 30 days (or drawn with screening labs)
* Partial immune responder or immune non-responder
* Age \> 18 years
* Labs (drawn at screening)
* Alanine transaminase (ALT) \< 5 X the upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total bili \< 2 X ULN
* Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior therapy with Kaletra
* Known hypersensitivity to Ritonavir
* Therapy the drugs with potential serious drug interactions: flecainide, propafenone, astemizole, terfenadine, rifampin, dihydroergotamine, ergonovine, ergotamine, methylergonovine, cisapride, pimozide, lovastatin, simvastatin, midazolam, triazolam, and St. John's wart.
* Pregnancy; breast feeding
* Current malignancy requiring CT
* Use of systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive, or cytotoxic agents within the last 45 days
* Fever and/or evidence of an active infectious complication
* Currently in another interventional clinical trial
* Receiving Interleukin-2 (IL-2) or any other cytokine or growth factor
* Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Pitrak, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pitrak DL, Estes R, Novak RM, Linnares-Diaz M, Tschampa JM. Beneficial effects of a switch to a Lopinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen for patients with partial or no immune reconstitution with highly active antiretroviral therapy despite complete viral suppression. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011 Jun;27(6):659-67. doi: 10.1089/aid.2010.0230. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21054216 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11711B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Second-line Switch to Dolutegravir Study
NCT04229290 COMPLETED PHASE4
Reducing Antiretroviral Treatments
NCT04051970 UNKNOWN PHASE3