Tiotropium Bromide Alone vs Tiotropium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate in Subjects With COPD (Study P04272)
NCT ID: NCT00139932
Last Updated: 2017-03-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
255 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-01
2006-11-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Phase IIIB Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Treatment in Patients With COPD
NCT00308191
Efficacy and Safety of Free Combination of Tiotropium + Formoterol Compared to Formoterol and Tiotropium in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT02238119
Efficacy Safety Study of Arformoterol/Tiotropium Combination Versus Either Therapy Alone in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT00424528
A Six-week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tiotropium Plus Formoterol to Salmeterol Plus Fluticasone in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT00239421
Study in Subjects Greater Than 40 Years of Age With COPD
NCT00507234
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
formoterol fumarate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must be current cigarette smokers or ex-smokers who stopped smoking at least 3 months prior to screening visit (V1). Subjects must have a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years (20 cigarettes per pack). Pack-years are calculated by multiplying the average packs of cigarettes smoked per day times the number of years.
* Subjects on stable inhaled corticosteroids are allowed to be enrolled and to remain on the treatment throughout the study.
* Subjects must be willing to give written informed consent and able to adhere to dose and visit schedules.
* Subjects must agree to inform their usual treating physician of their participation in this study.
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to the randomization of the study
* Nonpregnant women of childbearing potential must be using a medically acceptable, adequate form of birth control.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects quit smoking less than 3 months prior to the Screening visit (V1).
* Subjects have required ventilator support for respiratory failure within the last year.
* Subjects have clinically significant lung disease other than COPD, e.g., bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis, tuberculosis, etc.
* Subjects have undergone lobectomy, pneumonectomy or lung volume reduction surgery.
* Subjects have had lung cancer diagnosed or treated within the last five years.
* Subjects require nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bi-level positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP).
* Subjects have initiated pulmonary rehabilitation within the past 3 months.
* Subjects use oxygen \>= 2 liters per minute for \> 2 hours per day.
* Subjects require chronic or prophylactic treatment with antibiotics.
* Subjects have significant renal, hepatic, cardiovascular (including cor pulmonale), metabolic, neurologic, hematologic, gastrointestinal, cerebrovascular or other significant medical illness or disorder which, in the judgment of the Investigator, may interfere with the study or require treatment which may affect the evaluation of efficacy and safety of the study drug.
* Subjects have clinically significant abnormalities on chest x-ray (other than evidence of COPD) at the Screening visit or within the previous year.
* Women are pregnant or breast-feeding.
* Subjects cannot adhere to the concomitant medications restrictions and prohibitions.
* Subjects have used any investigational product within 30 days, or 3 months for any biologic of unknown half-life, prior to the Baseline Visit (V3).
* Subjects are part of the staff or a family member of the staff personnel directly involved with this study.
* Subjects have chronic narrow-angle glaucoma.
* Subjects have symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia or bladder-neck obstruction.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Integrated Therapeutics Group
INDUSTRY
Novartis
INDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tashkin DP, Pearle J, Iezzoni D, Varghese ST. Formoterol and tiotropium compared with tiotropium alone for treatment of COPD. COPD. 2009 Feb;6(1):17-25. doi: 10.1080/15412550902724073.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: CSR Synopsis
View DocumentRelated Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here to access a synopsis of the study results.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P04272
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.