Drug-eluting-stents for Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease (ISAR-LEFT-MAIN)

NCT ID: NCT00133237

Last Updated: 2010-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

607 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-07-31

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the advent of coronary stents and improvements in periprocedural antithrombotic regimen, the spectrum of indications of percutaneous coronary interventions has continuously expanded for patients with coronary heart disease, gaining ground in what have been traditionally considered as domains of coronary bypass surgery. Several groups reported the outcomes of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease treated with stenting. Most of them found that LMCA stenting was feasible and safe, and, in low-risk patients, it was associated with minimal periprocedural complications and low long-term morbidity and mortality. Despite these encouraging reports, a widespread use of this technique has been hampered by the still high incidence of restenosis. It is commonly accepted that coronary bypass graft surgery and stenting for unprotected LMCA disease are associated with similar rates of mortality, and that the higher incidence of restenosis and greater need for revascularization procedures after LMCA stenting remain the major contributors for the observed difference in clinical efficacy between both therapies. The recent introduction of stents eluting anti-restenotic drugs, with sirolimus and paclitaxel the most studied compounds, has opened new perspectives for the prevention of restenosis. Several randomized trials have reported excellent results in the reduction of restenosis and need for reinterventions with drug-eluting stents (DES). Although, none of these trials studied the benefit of DES for lesions located in the LMCA, their results suggested that use of these new devices may be particularly helpful for the reduction of restenosis in the group of patients with left main trunk disease. This is supported by the findings of several series of patients with unprotected LMCA disease who have been successfully treated with DES. Importantly, for patients who are unable to undergo CABG due to cardiac surgeons' refusal (poor surgical candidates) or their own unwillingness, stenting with DES remains the only revascularization alternative. Recent guidelines of PCI recommend stenting, preferentially with DES, for unprotected LMCA in the absence of other revascularization options.

Comparison:

Sirolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stent for treatment of lesions allocated at left main trunk.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sirolimus-eluting stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

cypher stent is implanted due to randomization.

B

Paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paclitaxel-eluting stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

taxus stent is implanted due to randomization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sirolimus-eluting stent

cypher stent is implanted due to randomization.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Paclitaxel-eluting stent

taxus stent is implanted due to randomization.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cypher Taxus

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than age 18 with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥50% stenosis located in unprotected LMCA who are unable to undergo coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
* Pretreatment with a loading dose of 300-600 mg clopidogrel
* Informed, written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiogenic shock;
* ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction within 48 h from symptom onset;
* In-stent restenosis;
* Malignancies or other comorbid conditions with life expectancy less than one year;
* Prior coronary artery bypass surgery with revascularization of left anterior descending (LAD) and/or left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery
* Planned staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure within 30 days from index procedure or prior PCI within the last 30 days
* Left main size \>4.5mm
* An elective surgical procedure is planned during the first six months post enrolment;
* Known allergy to the study medications
* Pregnancy
* Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Albert Schömig, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Adnan Kastrati, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Deutsches Herzzentrum

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

First Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ellis SG, Tamai H, Nobuyoshi M, Kosuga K, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Macaya C, Grines CL, Whitlow PL, White HJ, Moses J, Teirstein PS, Serruys PW, Bittl JA, Mooney MR, Shimshak TM, Block PC, Erbel R. Contemporary percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary stenoses: initial results from a multicenter registry analysis 1994-1996. Circulation. 1997 Dec 2;96(11):3867-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.11.3867.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9403609 (View on PubMed)

Park SJ, Park SW, Hong MK, Cheong SS, Lee CW, Kim JJ, Hong MK, Mintz GS, Leon MB. Stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: immediate and late outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jan;31(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00425-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9426015 (View on PubMed)

Takagi T, Stankovic G, Finci L, Toutouzas K, Chieffo A, Spanos V, Liistro F, Briguori C, Corvaja N, Albero R, Sivieri G, Paloschi R, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation. 2002 Aug 6;106(6):698-702. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000024983.34728.5d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12163430 (View on PubMed)

Ellis SG, Hill CM, Lytle BW. Spectrum of surgical risk for left main coronary stenoses: benchmark for potentially competing percutaneous therapies. Am Heart J. 1998 Feb;135(2 Pt 1):335-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70102-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9489985 (View on PubMed)

Chieffo A, Stankovic G, Bonizzoni E, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, Montorfano M, Airoldi F, Michev I, Sangiorgi MG, Carlino M, Vitrella G, Colombo A. Early and mid-term results of drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main. Circulation. 2005 Feb 15;111(6):791-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000155256.88940.F8. Epub 2005 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15699254 (View on PubMed)

Valgimigli M, van Mieghem CA, Ong AT, Aoki J, Granillo GA, McFadden EP, Kappetein AP, de Feyter PJ, Smits PC, Regar E, Van der Giessen WJ, Sianos G, de Jaegere P, Van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Short- and long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registries (RESEARCH and T-SEARCH). Circulation. 2005 Mar 22;111(11):1383-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158486.20865.8B.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15781749 (View on PubMed)

Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, Camici PG, Colombo A, Hamm C, Jorgensen E, Marco J, Nordrehaug JE, Ruzyllo W, Urban P, Stone GW, Wijns W; Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005 Apr;26(8):804-47. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi138. Epub 2005 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15769784 (View on PubMed)

Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Byrne RA, Bruskina O, Iijima R, Schulz S, Pache J, Seyfarth M, Massberg S, Laugwitz KL, Dirschinger J, Schomig A; LEFT-MAIN Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Coronary Left Main Lesions Study Investigators. Paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 12;53(19):1760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.035.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19422982 (View on PubMed)

Cassese S, Kufner S, Xhepa E, Byrne RA, Kreutzer J, Ibrahim T, Tiroch K, Valgimigli M, Tolg R, Fusaro M, Schunkert H, Laugwitz KL, Mehilli J, Kastrati A. Three-year efficacy and safety of new- versus early-generation drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease insights from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jul;105(7):575-84. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0953-x. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26689707 (View on PubMed)

Tiroch K, Mehilli J, Byrne RA, Schulz S, Massberg S, Laugwitz KL, Vorpahl M, Seyfarth M, Kastrati A; ISAR-LEFT MAIN Study Investigators. Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24332416 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GE IDE No. S02005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drug Eluting Stent (DES) in Primary Angioplasty
NCT00759850 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Coroflex ISAR 2000 Registry
NCT02629575 COMPLETED
Oral Sirolimus for In-Stent Restenosis
NCT00859183 COMPLETED PHASE4