Improving Coronary Prevention in a County Health System
NCT ID: NCT00128687
Last Updated: 2014-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
419 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-04-30
2008-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Heart to Health: A Combined Lifestyle and Medication Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk
NCT01245686
Heart of the Family: A Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction Intervention in High-Risk Rural Families
NCT04891575
Enhancing Support for Women at Risk for Heart Disease
NCT00142701
Denver Health Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Prevention Program
NCT00829491
Heart Disease on the Mend
NCT00127751
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Evidence from extensive population studies and clinical trials shows the effectiveness of risk factor management in reducing morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease (CAD). These studies have generated important national clinical practice guidelines. Current prevention practices, however, fall short of attaining the goals recommended in these national guidelines. These shortfalls lead to unnecessary CAD disease burden, as well as perpetuation of socioeconomic disparities. Case management proves to augment current CAD prevention activities and improve adherence with national guidelines. The Stanford Health Education and Risk Reduction Training (HEAR2T) program is an innovative, yet well-tested, case management tool which will be evaluated in this study. HEAR2T has been developed and evaluated in several studies at Stanford. It is based upon the social cognitive model of Bandura and uses case managers to work intensely with patients to educate them and change their overall behavior related to health.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The Stanford Health Education and Risk Reduction Training (HEAR2T) program will be evaluated in a high-risk population of low socioeconomic status (SES) served by the county health care system of San Mateo County (SMC), California. The study will: 1) enhance the HEAR2T program for use in low-SES populations; 2) implement this program as an integral part of clinical care; 3) implement a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of HEAR2T in lowering aggregate CAD risk; 4) determine if HEAR2T diminishes socioeconomic disparities; 5) estimate HEAR2T's cost effectiveness; and 6) transition the intervention from a research study to an ongoing County CAD case management program. The primary outcome measure will be change in aggregate CAD risk score, calculated from a Framingham model based on individual CAD risk factors. The primary hypothesis is that patients case-management via the HEAR2T model will produce favorable changes in aggregate CAD risk score compared to control patients in usual care. An estimated 200 intervention and 200 usual care patients will be enrolled from four health centers in the SMC system. Usual care patients will crossover to the intervention after 15 months, allowing for additional assessment of the intervention's impact. Continued follow-up of the participants will assess the durability of risk changes achieved during initial intensive case-management. This study will make a critical and innovative contribution to defining optimal disease management in a low-SES population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate Intervention
Participants in both arms continue to receive usual medical care throughout the study period. In addition, participants randomized to Immediate Intervention receive intensive case management for Coronary heart disease (CHD) risk reduction for 15 months and then a maintenance program for a minimum of 12 months to assess the durability of initial intervention changes.
risk reduction
Participants receive intensive case management for CHD risk reduction for 15 months and then a maintenance program for a minimum of 12 months. Lifestyle modification was strongly emphasized as a critical component of achieving CHD prevention goals. Dietary management was emphasized, including recommendation of a low saturated fat (less than 7% of caloric intake), low cholesterol (\< 150 mg/day), mainly plant-based diet with calorie restrictions for overweight/obese persons. Stress management and coping skills were emphasized, including a regular exercise regimen (≥ 30 minutes of moderate intensity on most days). Cigarette smokers were encouraged to join a stop smoking program.
Delayed Intervention
Participants randomized to Delayed Intervention serve as control for Immediate Intervention patients for the first 15 months and then receive intensive case management for 15 months. The switching-over design not only addresses ethical concerns about withholding treatment from half the study sample, but will also enable us to assess whether the intervention had equal impact whether provided to a naïve population or to a group followed in usual care for 15 months.
risk reduction
Participants receive intensive case management for CHD risk reduction for 15 months and then a maintenance program for a minimum of 12 months. Lifestyle modification was strongly emphasized as a critical component of achieving CHD prevention goals. Dietary management was emphasized, including recommendation of a low saturated fat (less than 7% of caloric intake), low cholesterol (\< 150 mg/day), mainly plant-based diet with calorie restrictions for overweight/obese persons. Stress management and coping skills were emphasized, including a regular exercise regimen (≥ 30 minutes of moderate intensity on most days). Cigarette smokers were encouraged to join a stop smoking program.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
risk reduction
Participants receive intensive case management for CHD risk reduction for 15 months and then a maintenance program for a minimum of 12 months. Lifestyle modification was strongly emphasized as a critical component of achieving CHD prevention goals. Dietary management was emphasized, including recommendation of a low saturated fat (less than 7% of caloric intake), low cholesterol (\< 150 mg/day), mainly plant-based diet with calorie restrictions for overweight/obese persons. Stress management and coping skills were emphasized, including a regular exercise regimen (≥ 30 minutes of moderate intensity on most days). Cigarette smokers were encouraged to join a stop smoking program.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient does not have CAD or CAD risk equivalent but has at least one of the following: SBP ≥ 160 mmHg, DBP ≥ 100 mmHg, LDL ≥ 190 mg/dL, TC ≥ 240 mg/dL, TG ≥ 500 mg/dL, HbA1c ≥ 8.0%, BMI ≥ 35, or is a current smoker.
* The patient does not have CAD or CAD risk equivalent but has at least two of the following: a) SBP ≥ 140 mmHg or DBP ≤ 90 mmHg, b) HDL ≤ 40 mm/dL or TG ≥ 200 mg/dL, c) LDL ≥ 160 mg/dL or TC ≥ 240 mg/dL, d) FBS ≥ 110 mg/dL × 2, or e) male age ≥ 45 or female age ≥ 55 or with positive family history of CAD.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of spoken English or Spanish by patient or household member 18 years or older who can serve as an interpreter
* Moving before end of intervention (30 months)
* Age between 35 and 85 (inclusive)
* Significant comorbidities such as: uncontrolled metabolic disorders (renal failure, liver failure, etc.), active symptoms suggesting acute myocardial infarction or decompensated congestive heart failure, Malignancy or other condition limiting life expectancy, psychiatric disorder with active manifestations.
* Substance abuse.
* No telephone or means of contacting patient.
* Family household member already enrolled.
* Homeless and not living with relatives/friends.
* Anticipated absence for more than 4 consecutive months.
* Difficulty coming to appointments approximately every 1-2 months
* Already participating in the Diabetes program
* Currently pregnant or intends to get pregnant the next 3 years.
35 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Stanford University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Randall Stafford
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Randall Stafford
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ma J, Berra K, Haskell WL, Klieman L, Hyde S, Smith MW, Xiao L, Stafford RS. Case management to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease in a county health care system. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1988-95. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.381.
Berra K, Ma J, Klieman L, Hyde S, Monti V, Guardado A, Rivera S, Stafford RS. Implementing cardiac risk-factor case management: lessons learned in a county health system. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2007 Dec;6(4):173-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31815b5609.
Stafford RS, Berra K. Critical factors in case management: practical lessons from a cardiac case management program. Dis Manag. 2007 Aug;10(4):197-207. doi: 10.1089/dis.2007.103624.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.