Reducing Total Cardiovascular Risk in an Urban Community
NCT ID: NCT00241904
Last Updated: 2017-09-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
525 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-05-31
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two cardiovascular risk reduction programs - a comprehensive intensive (Cl) intervention with a less intensive (LI) intervention - in African American, and white low-income patients with known excessive cardiovascular disease risk.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multi-Targeted Cardiac Risk Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00409240
Problem Solving and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management in Diabetic Blacks
NCT00201110
Reducing CVD Risk in African Americans Faith Communities
NCT02235896
Cardiovascular Disease Education and Problem-Solving Training in People With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00964587
Strategies to Maintain Cardiac Risk Control After Discharge From Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Clinic
NCT00358033
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study is based on the premise that a community-based participatory research partnership model, using a team of an advanced practice nurse case manager, community health worker (CHW), and physician can be translated into urban community clinics and improve the quality of care and reduce disparities in cardiovascular health in minority and other underserved populations. Despite well-publicized guidelines on the appropriate management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes, implementation of CVD risk-reducing practices remains poor. In spite of the known benefit of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below 100 mg/dl in persons with existing heart disease, as many as 50 to 70 percent of eligible CVD patients are not placed on lipid-lowering therapy by their providers and from 20 to 80 percent of patients do not achieve the goals of therapy. The benefits of controlling high blood pressure (HBP) are well established, yet national rates of HBP control remain at only 31 percent despite decades of provider and patient education. In addition, it is well established that control of glycemia, hyperlipidemia, and blood pressure reduce the risk of vascular complications in people with diabetes, 75 percent of whom die from some form of heart or blood vessel disease. This randomized trial will compare the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a CI intervention with a LI intervention in African American, and white low-income patients with known excessive CVD risk.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
Eligible patients with CVD or type 2 diabetes will be randomly selected from two urban federally funded community clinics and randomly assigned to receive either 1) a Cl intervention delivered by a nurse practitioner, a CHW, and the patient's physician, focusing on behavioral interventions to affect therapeutic lifestyle changes and medication adherence as well as the prescription and titration of medications or 2) a LI intervention providing feedback on CVD risk factors and guidelines to patients and their physicians. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and one and two years. It is hypothesized that a higher proportion of patients in the Cl intervention group will achieve the treatment goals for lipid, blood pressure, and diabetes management, lifestyle behaviors and utilization of antiplatelet agent, beta blocker, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapies and that the Cl intervention will be cost-effective. Secondary outcomes include assessment of the impact of the Cl intervention model on patients' satisfaction with care and health care utilization. The increase in the percentage of high-risk women and men who receive recommended secondary prevention therapies and achieve goal levels could potentially result in a marked decrement in annual CVD mortality and health disparities if applied within primary care settings to populations with the characteristics of the target groups for this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Comprehensive Intervention Group
The NP/CHW intervention focused on behavioral interventions to affect therapeutic lifestyle changes and adherence to medications and appointments as well as the prescription and titration of medications for one year. The NP and CHW worked as a team. The NP oversaw the initial assessment and, in collaboration with the CHW, tailored the intervention plan, conducted the intervention including lifestyle modification counseling and medication titration and prescription, consulted with the physician, and supervised the CHW. Specific algorithms for drug treatment of hyperlipidemia, hypertension (HBP), hyperglycemia, ACE, and β-blocker therapy were developed for this study based on current guidelines and standards of care.
Lifestyle Changes
Nutrition counseling, smoking cessation counseling, medication compliance counseling, exercise
Antiplatelet Agents
Aspirin 81 mg q day
Beta Blocker
Oral medication
ACE Inhibitors
Oral medications, received 1-2 times per day
Less Intensive Intervention Group
Participants will receive usual care from their physicians and a Less Intensive (LI) intervention of feedback on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and guidelines to patients and their physicians. Patients and their providers in the received the results of baseline lipids, BP, and HbA1c along with the recommended goal levels and a pamphlet on controlling risk factors published by the American Heart Association. In addition, providers received copies of the AHA/ACC Guidelines for Secondary Prevention.
Lifestyle Changes
Nutrition counseling, smoking cessation counseling, medication compliance counseling, exercise
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lifestyle Changes
Nutrition counseling, smoking cessation counseling, medication compliance counseling, exercise
Antiplatelet Agents
Aspirin 81 mg q day
Beta Blocker
Oral medication
ACE Inhibitors
Oral medications, received 1-2 times per day
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* African American or Caucasian and have diagnosed CVD, defined as a prior myocardial infarction, revascularization procedure for coronary disease, ischemic heart disease, stroke, or have diagnosed type 2 diabetes and not receiving any therapy
* Have either no LDL-C in their medical record during the 12 months prior to study entry or have an LDL greater than or equal to 100 mg/dl on or off lipid lowering pharmacotherapy
* Have either no blood pressure recorded in their medical record during the 12 months prior to study entry or a BP greater than 140/90 mmHg or greater than 130/80 mmHg if the participant is diabetic or has renal insufficiency
* If the participant is diabetic he or she has to either have no HbA1c recorded during the 12 months prior to study entry or HbA1c of 7 percent or greater
Exclusion Criteria
* A serious physician-recorded psychiatric morbidity that would interfere with the study
* Sufficient neurological impairment that would interfere with the study
21 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jerilyn Allen
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allen JK, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Szanton SL, Bone L, Hill MN, Levine DM, West M, Barlow A, Lewis-Boyer L, Donnelly-Strozzo M, Curtis C, Anderson K. Community Outreach and Cardiovascular Health (COACH) Trial: a randomized, controlled trial of nurse practitioner/community health worker cardiovascular disease risk reduction in urban community health centers. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Nov 1;4(6):595-602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.961573. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
335
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT00385619
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.