Does Extra-High Dose Hepatitis B Vaccination Confer Longer Serological Protection in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients?

NCT ID: NCT00125775

Last Updated: 2010-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hepatitis B virus causes inflammation of the liver which is detrimental to the end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis. Hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for this high-risk population although the vaccine protection remains suboptimal and does not last long.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best vaccination strategy over a 6-month period using recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) in peritoneal dialysis patients. Current data show that the traditional Engerix-B vaccine dose (40 micrograms) does not always lead to protective and long-lasting hepatitis B surface antibody. The investigators, therefore, decided to compare the usual 40-micrograms with an 80-microgram dose strategy of vaccine protection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of the present randomized study is to evaluate the optimum strategy of recombinant hepatitis B vaccination in the maintenance of protective anti-HBs antibody among end-stage renal disease patients on peritoneal dialysis. This study is designed to establish whether a three-dose schedule of 80 microgram Engerix-B vaccine could maintain protective antibody response among dialysis patients. The secondary aim is to identify the effects of dosing on various subgroups of dialysis patients.

Viral hepatitis B infection remains a major health hazard for end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis. The direct costs of hepatitis B infection and long term impact on morbidity and renal transplantation are substantial. Apart from the devastating consequences of hepatitis B infection on patients on dialysis or after transplantation, infected patients are potential reservoirs for infecting other patients and haemodialysis staff. Antibody production achieved in renal patients is suboptimal; the most effective method of vaccination to prevent hepatitis B infections in end-stage renal disease subjects has hitherto been unanswered by the current literature and the latest Cochrane Collaboration review.

Given the relatively low seroconversion rate and maintenance of protective hepatitis antibody levels among end-stage renal disease patients, a treatment strategy using various doses of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) has been recently explored. In an observational study, the investigators demonstrated no statistically significant difference in response rate between patients receiving three recommended doses of Engerix-B intramuscularly (40 micrograms each dose) and those with four times the normal adult dose (80 micrograms each dose), (78% versus 100%, P = 0.23). On the other hand, according to the Kaplan-Meier estimates, 78 percent of patients in the 40 micrograms Engerix-B vaccination group and 96 percent of patients in the 80 micrograms dosing group had maintained the seroprotective levels of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) at 12 months after initial response. This difference corresponds to an absolute risk reduction of 18 percent for losing the antibody response with a three-dose schedule of 80 micrograms Engerix-B vaccination program. In other words, the investigators estimate that giving Engerix-B 80 micrograms dose would lead to one extra end-stage renal disease subject with persistent seroprotective anti-HBs level at one year for every 5.6 patients treated (number needed to treat to benefit NNT, 5.6; 95% confidence interval, 5.4 to 5.8).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peritoneal Dialysis Renal Disease, End-Stage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Engerix-B 40 mcg dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Engerix-B

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Engerix-B at 0, 1, 6 months

2

Engerix-B 80 mcg dose

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Engerix-B

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Engerix-B at 0, 1, 6 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Engerix-B

Engerix-B at 0, 1, 6 months

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age above 18 years
* End-stage renal disease and on maintenance peritoneal dialysis
* Serologically negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis core antigen (anti-HBc)
* No history of receiving hepatitis B vaccination
* Willingness to give written informed consent and willingness to participate in and comply with the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* Expected survival less than 6 months
* Those who refused vaccination
* Active malignancy
* Alcoholic liver disease
* Chronic hepatitis C and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
* Receiving immunosuppressive medications
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kai Ming Chow, MRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Prince of Wales Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prince of Wales Hospital

New Territories, New Territories, Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRE-2005.134

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

China Q Cohort Study
NCT04197674 UNKNOWN
Chinese Medicine on Deferring Dialysis Initiation
NCT02194946 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2