Anthrax Vaccine Clinical Trial to Assess Dose Reduction and Route Change
NCT ID: NCT00119067
Last Updated: 2024-05-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1564 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-05-31
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To assess whether:
* Anthrax vaccine (AVA or BioThrax, BioPort Corp. Lansing MI) administered by the intramuscular (IM) route elicits antibody responses that are not inferior (i.e., "non-inferior") to that achieved by the currently licensed schedule.
* BioThrax administered by the IM route and containing fewer numbers of doses elicits antibody responses that are not inferior (i.e., "non-inferior") to that achieved by the currently licensed schedule.
* Differences in reactogenicity exist between the IM and subcutaneous (SQ) administration of BioThrax.
Additionally for the final report we will assess whether:
* Occurrence of adverse events following AVA administration is influenced by selected risk factors.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity Study of AV7909 Anthrax Vaccine in Healthy Adults
NCT01263691
Immunogenicity and Safety Study of a Three-Dose BioThrax® Regimen for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis in Healthy Adults
NCT01491607
Anthrax AV7909 Liquid vs Lyophilized
NCT04660201
Assessment of the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Dose-Sparing BioThrax® AVA Schedule
NCT01641991
Trial of rPA-102 Vaccine in Healthy Adult Volunteers
NCT00100724
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is conducted among a total of 1564 healthy adult men and women (18 to 61 years of age) at five sites in the United States. Participants were randomized into one of 6 study groups with 260 participants per group. One group receives BioThrax given as currently licensed (SQ with 6 doses followed by annual boosters); another group is given placebo IM (130 participants) or SQ (130 participants) in the currently licensed dosing regimen. The four other groups receive BioThrax IM in modified dosing regimens; placebo is given when a dose of BioThrax is omitted from the licensed dosing regimen. There are a total of 25 required visits for this study, during which all participants receive an injection of vaccine or placebo (8 injections total), have a blood sample drawn (16 or 17 total), and have an in-clinic examination for adverse events (22 total).
Immunogenicity is assessed by assaying 16 serial blood samples obtained from all participants and a 17th sample from a subset of participants before vaccination and at other specified times. Total anti-protective antigen IgG antibody (anti-PA IgG) is quantified using a standardized and validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); the primary study endpoints are 4-fold rise in antibody titer and antibody concentration relative to the pre-vaccination titers or assay reactivity threshold. A subset of serum samples is also assayed in an in vitro toxin neutralization assay (TNA) to measure the functional activity of anti-BioThrax antibodies. The kinetics of the immune response to BioThrax are examined at 3 time points in the study and blood samples from a subset of participants will be further tested in correlates of protection and immunogenetics substudies. All adverse events (AEs), including vaccine reactogenicity, are actively monitored. While all AEs will be ascertained among study participants, several endpoints will be defined based on the likelihood of their occurrence and/or their clinical importance. Of primary interest is the occurrence of local AEs such as warmth, tenderness, itching, pain, arm motion limitation, erythema, induration, nodule, and bruise. Systemic AEs such as fever, fatigue, muscle ache, headache, temperature, and painful axillary adenopathy are also evaluated.
This study is expected to provide the basis for consideration of change in route of BioThrax administration from SQ to IM and reduction in number of vaccine doses required for primary and booster immunization.
There is an interim analysis of data collected through each participant's first 7 months of this study for consideration in changing the route of BioThrax administration from SQ to IM, and elimination of the 2 week vaccine priming dose.
At the end of the study, the Sponsor will present the entire results of the trial to FDA for consideration in elimination of additional doses from the licensed BioThrax schedule. At that time, the Sponsor will also supplement these data with results from parallel non-human primate challenge studies and additional research on immunologic correlates of protection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed 8-SQ
receive 8 injections of AVA injected SQ at the same points as the original licensure: 0m, 2weeks, 1m, 6m, 12m, 18m, and 2 boosters - 30m and 42m.
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed 8-IM
receive 8 injections of AVA IM administered at 0m, 2weeks, 1m, 6m, 12m, 18m, and 2 boosters - 30m and 42m.
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed 7-IM
receive 7 injections of AVA IM administered at 0m, 1m, 6m, 12m, 18m, and 2 boosters - 30m and 42m.
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed 5-IM
receive 5 injections of AVA IM administered at 0m, 1m, 6m, and 2 boosters - 30m and 42m.
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed 4-IM
receive 4 injections of AVA IM; months 0, 2, 6 and a booster at month 42
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
Saline placebo IM or SQ
Saline injections to be administered either IM or SQ at 0m, 2weeks, 1m, 6m, 12m, 18m, and 2 boosters - 30m and 42m.
Saline injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed
Saline injection
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
61 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
FED
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Wright, DVM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama, Birmingham (UAB)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Emory
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Walter Reed Army Institute for Research (WRAIR)
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Baylor
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marano N, Plikaytis BD, Martin SW, Rose C, Semenova VA, Martin SK, Freeman AE, Li H, Mulligan MJ, Parker SD, Babcock J, Keitel W, El Sahly H, Poland GA, Jacobson RM, Keyserling HL, Soroka SD, Fox SP, Stamper JL, McNeil MM, Perkins BA, Messonnier N, Quinn CP; Anthrax Vaccine Research Program Working Group. Effects of a reduced dose schedule and intramuscular administration of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunogenicity and safety at 7 months: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Oct 1;300(13):1532-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.13.1532.
Wright JG, Plikaytis BD, Rose CE, Parker SD, Babcock J, Keitel W, El Sahly H, Poland GA, Jacobson RM, Keyserling HL, Semenova VA, Li H, Schiffer J, Dababneh H, Martin SK, Martin SW, Marano N, Messonnier NE, Quinn CP. Effect of reduced dose schedules and intramuscular injection of anthrax vaccine adsorbed on immunological response and safety profile: a randomized trial. Vaccine. 2014 Feb 12;32(8):1019-28. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.039. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
Quinn CP, Sabourin CL, Schiffer JM, Niemuth NA, Semenova VA, Li H, Rudge TL, Brys AM, Mittler RS, Ibegbu CC, Wrammert J, Ahmed R, Parker SD, Babcock J, Keitel W, Poland GA, Keyserling HL, El Sahly H, Jacobson RM, Marano N, Plikaytis BD, Wright JG. Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immune Responses to Alternate Booster Schedules of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016 Apr 4;23(4):326-38. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00696-15. Print 2016 Apr.
Falola MI, Wiener HW, Wineinger NE, Cutter GR, Kimberly RP, Edberg JC, Arnett DK, Kaslow RA, Tang J, Shrestha S. Genomic copy number variants: evidence for association with antibody response to anthrax vaccine adsorbed. PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064813. Print 2013.
Pajewski NM, Parker SD, Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Song W, Zhang K, McKinney BA, Pankratz VS, Edberg JC, Kimberly RP, Jacobson RM, Tang J, Kaslow RA. The role of HLA-DR-DQ haplotypes in variable antibody responses to anthrax vaccine adsorbed. Genes Immun. 2011 Sep;12(6):457-65. doi: 10.1038/gene.2011.15. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDC-NCID-3344
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.