Combination Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00112658

Last Updated: 2021-03-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

342 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective as first-line therapy in treating pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works as first-line therapy in treating patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Compare the objective response rate in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil vs gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. (Phase II)
* Compare the survival of patients treated with these regimens. (Phase III)

Secondary

* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens. (Phase III)
* Compare the overall response rate in patients treated with these regimens. (Phase III)
* Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. (Phase III)

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours, irinotecan IV over 1½ hours, leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours, and fluorouracil IV over 5 minutes on day 1 and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. Courses repeat every 14 days.
* Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 43. Beginning on day 57, patients receive gemcitabine IV once weekly for 3 weeks (days 57, 64, and 71). Courses repeat every 28 days.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 348 patients (88 for phase II and 260 for phase III) will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Folfirinox

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

irinotecan hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

leucovorin calcium

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Gemcitabine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

irinotecan hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

leucovorin calcium

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

* No other pancreatic tumor type, including either of the following:

* Neuroendocrine tumor
* Acinar cell tumor
* Metastatic disease
* Measurable disease in an area not previously irradiated
* No cerebral metastases or meningeal involvement of the tumor

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

* 18 to 75

Performance status

* WHO 0-1

Life expectancy

* Not specified

Hematopoietic

* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3

Hepatic

* Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (biliary drainage allowed)

Renal

* Creatinine \< 120 mmol/L

Cardiovascular

* No prior myocardial infarction
* No prior angina
* No uncompensated cardiac or coronary insufficiency
* No symptomatic arrhythmia

Gastrointestinal

* No prior inflammatory bowel disease
* No prior chronic diarrhea
* No unresolved symptomatic occlusion or subocclusion of the bowel

Other

* Not pregnant or nursing
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No ongoing active infection
* No other malignancy except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* No contraindication to study treatment
* No other serious medical disorder that would preclude study treatment
* No psychiatric disorder or social or geographic situation that would preclude study participation
* Not detained or under the guardianship of another person

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* Not specified

Chemotherapy

* No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

* Not specified

Radiotherapy

* No prior radiotherapy

Surgery

* Not specified

Other

* No concurrent participation in another clinical trial using therapeutic experimental agents
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UNICANCER

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thierry Conroy, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Centre Alexis Vautrin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Hopital Duffaut

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier General

Belfort, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Regional de Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Hopital Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint Andre

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Institut Bergonie

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Hopital Ambroise Pare

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Docteur Duchenne

Boulogne-sur-Mer, , France

Site Status

CHU de Caen

Caen, , France

Site Status

Centre Regional Francois Baclesse

Caen, , France

Site Status

Centre Jean Perrin

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CHR Clermont Ferrand, Hotel Dieu

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Hopitaux Civils de Colmar

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hopital Du Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges-Francois Leclerc

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal St. Aubin les Elbeuf

Elbeuf, , France

Site Status

Clinique Saint Vincent

Épernay, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Departemental

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

CMC Les Ormeaux

Le Havre, , France

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint Vincent de Paul

Lille, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique des Quatre Pavillons

Lormont, , France

Site Status

Hopital de la Croix Rousse

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Centre Leon Berard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hopital Edouard Herriot - Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Hopital Ambroise Pare

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU de la Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU Nord

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hopital Notre-Dame de Bon Secours

Metz, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier General de Mont de Marsan

Mont-de-Marsan, , France

Site Status

Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Centre Regional Rene Gauducheau

Nantes-Saint Herblain, , France

Site Status

CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hopital Bichat - Claude Bernard

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint Michel

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan

Perpignan, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Institut Jean Godinot

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU - Robert Debre

Reims, , France

Site Status

Centre Eugene Marquis

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Hopital Charles Nicolle

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Clinique Armoricaine De Radiologie

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Centre Rene Huguenin

Saint-Cloud, , France

Site Status

Clinique Charcot

Sainte-Foy-lès-Lyon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Semur en Auxois

Semur-en-Auxois, , France

Site Status

Centre Paul Strauss

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Tarbes

Tarbes, , France

Site Status

Institut Claudius Regaud

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU de Tours

Tours, , France

Site Status

Centre Alexis Vautrin

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21561347 (View on PubMed)

Ychou M, Desseigne F, Guimbaud R, et al.: Randomized phase II trial comparing folfirinox (5FU/leucovorin [LV], irinotecan [I] and oxaliplatin [O]) vs gemcitabine (G) as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA): first results of the ACCORD 11 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-4516, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Lambert A, Jarlier M, Gourgou Bourgade S, Conroy T. Response to FOLFIRINOX by gender in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Results from the PRODIGE 4/ ACCORD 11 randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0183288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183288. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28931010 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FRE-FNCLCC-ACCORD-11/0402

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20512

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000430100

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

First-line Therapy in Metastatic PDAC
NCT03487016 UNKNOWN PHASE2