Gemcitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00058149

Last Updated: 2011-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without oxaliplatin in treating patients who have locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare survival of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with prolonged infusion gemcitabine with vs without oxaliplatin vs standard infusion gemcitabine.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
* Compare the objective response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the patterns of failure and progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the reported frequency of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the changes in quality of life, including improved symptom control and/or additional side effects of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2) and disease stage (locally advanced vs metastatic). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.

* Arm I (standard treatment): Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes once weekly for 7 weeks followed by 1 week of rest for course 1 only. In all subsequent courses, patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, with courses repeating every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 150 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 120 minutes on day 2. Courses repeat every 2 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then at 8 and 16 weeks.

Patients are followed for 3 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 789 patients (263 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 18 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

oxaliplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Measurable and/or nonmeasurable disease
* Must have evidence of disease outside prior radiation fields OR radiologically confirmed progression of disease within the radiation fields after completion of radiotherapy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

* 18 and over

Performance status

* ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

* Not specified

Hematopoietic

* WBC ≥ 3,500/mm\^3 OR
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
* Platelet count ≥ 125,000/mm\^3

Hepatic

* Bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dL
* AST \< 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)

Renal

* Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN

Cardiovascular

* No uncontrolled cardiac disease

Other

* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test

* Negative vaginal ultrasound for patients with an elevated beta human chorionic gonadotropin level
* Fertile patients must use effective nonhormonal contraception
* No other malignancies within the past 5 years except nonmetastatic, nonmelanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or cancer cured by surgery or small field radiotherapy
* No active or uncontrolled infection
* No other active illness that would preclude study participation
* No symptomatic sensory peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* Not specified

Chemotherapy

* No prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease
* No prior (including adjuvant) gemcitabine or oxaliplatin
* Prior adjuvant chemotherapy allowed provided there was more than 6 months between the last dose of adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence of pancreatic cancer
* Prior chemotherapy as a radiosensitizing agent allowed\* NOTE: \*To the primary site

Endocrine therapy

* Not specified

Radiotherapy

* See Disease Characteristics
* At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy to the primary tumor site and recovered
* No prior radiotherapy to more than 25% of the functional bone marrow

Surgery

* See Disease Characteristics
* Prior surgical resection allowed

Other

* No concurrent participation in supportive care trials
* Concurrent enrollment on protocol ECOG-E1Y03 allowed
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth A. Poplin, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Comprehensive Cancer Institute

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Mayo Clinic Scottsdale Oncology Program

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of Aurora - South Campus

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boulder Community Hospital

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Penrose Cancer Center at Penrose Hospital

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Porter Adventist Hospital

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph Hospital

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Denver Rose

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Incorporated

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Swedish Medical Center

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Sky Ridge Medical Center

Lone Tree, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hope Cancer Care Center at Longmont United Hospital

Longmont, Colorado, United States

Site Status

St. Mary-Corwin Regional Medical Center

Pueblo, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Thornton

Thornton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Atlanta (Decatur)

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lakeside Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Central Illinois

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Decatur Memorial Hospital Cancer Care Institute

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Hinsdale Hematology Oncology Associates

Hinsdale, Illinois, United States

Site Status

La Grange Oncology Associates

La Grange, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Swedish-American Regional Cancer Center

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Cancer Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center at Tufts - New England Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

West Michigan Cancer Center

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Metro-Minnesota

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - East Orange

East Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

NYU Cancer Institute at New York University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Cancer Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Merit Care Hospital

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

MetroHealth's Cancer Care Center at MetroHealth Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbus

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hillman Cancer Center at University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

CCOP - MainLine Health

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Vanderbilt Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Scott and White Hospital

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - St. Vincent Hospital Cancer Center, Green Bay

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Pretoria Academic Hospital

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, Rothenberg ML, Hochster H, Mitchell E, Alberts S, O'Dwyer P, Haller D, Catalano P, Cella D, Benson AB 3rd. Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3778-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.9007. Epub 2009 Jul 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19581537 (View on PubMed)

Liebes L, Levy DE, Poplin E, et al.: Gemcitabine (G) plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics in E6201: greater metabolite levels using fixed dosing rate (FDR) delivery. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-2024, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Poplin E, Levy DE, Berlin J, et al.: Phase III trial of gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose-rate infusion[FDR]) versus gemcitabine + oxaliplatin(GEMOX) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (E6201). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-LBA4004, 180s, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ECOG-6201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000287015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.