Intraperitoneal tgDCC-E1 and Intravenous Paclitaxel in Women With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00102622

Last Updated: 2018-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-12-01

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical research study is to find the highest safe dose of intraperitoneal tgDCC-E1A that can be given in combination with paclitaxel as a treatment for patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. How the cancer responds to this treatment will also be studied. Researchers will also ask the patients if they will allow additional tumor samples to be collected and extra blood samples to be drawn. These samples will be used to learn about the biological response before and after treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Objective

* To evaluate toxicity and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal tgDCC-E1A in combination with intravenous paclitaxel.
* To measure tumor response of intraperitoneal tgDCC-E1A in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and compare to intravenous paclitaxel

Secondary Objective

* To measure time to progression and overall survival.
* To examine the biological effects of combined tgDCC- E1A and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer cells as measured by laboratory testing.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is a significant public health problem. It is the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. Globally, it is estimated that 162,000 new cases are diagnosed per year, and that 106,000 women die from the disease per year.

Signs and symptoms of ovarian cancer are often subtle. Seventy-five percent of subjects will present with advanced stage III and IV disease. Standard treatment for stage III/IV subjects consists of surgical debulking to the maximal extent possible and chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus a platinum compound (cisplatin or carboplatin). Despite high initial response rates, the overall survival for this group is poor, with only 20% of stage III and less than 5% of stage IV subjects surviving five years.

Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer varies depending upon the interval between prior treatment and recurrence. Twenty percent of subjects are classified as "platinum-refractory", in that they fail to have even a partial response to a platinum-containing regimen. Subjects with recurrent or progressive disease less than six months after initial therapy have a poor response rate to repeat treatment with a platinum-containing regimen, and are generally considered to have "platinum-resistant" disease. In contrast, subjects with recurrent disease greater than six months after initial therapy have better response rates to repeat treatment with platinum-containing regimens, and are generally considered to have "platinum-sensitive" disease.

There is no consensus for the treatment of "platinum-refractory" or "platinum-resistant" ovarian cancer, a class of individuals who are particularly challenging to treat. Prognosis is poor, and treatment is primarily palliative in nature. Responses to a variety of single chemotherapeutic agents, as well as to a combination of agents in largely phase II trials have been similar, ranging from 10-35%. Intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, given alone or in combination with other agents is a standard treatment for subjects who have relapsed. In an attempt to increase the dose intensity of paclitaxel therapy, weekly IV paclitaxel has been recommended. This treatment schedule is well tolerated, but the response rate in heavily pretreated subjects is still only 28.9%.

Given that this group of subjects is poorly responsive to conventional chemotherapy, and consequently has limited options, an alternative approach to treatment is warranted. The use of a gene therapy agent with anti-tumor effects and the ability to sensitize cancer cells to traditional chemotherapy is appealing.

* Overview of the Effect of E1A Gene Transfer on Cancer Cells:

E1A, a gene derived from Adenovirus type 5, has been shown to have potent anti-neoplastic activity through a variety of mechanisms, including down-regulation of HER-2/neu overexpression, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of metastasis, and reversion of tumor cells toward a differentiated epithelial phenotype. The E1A gene has also been shown to have an additive effect in vitro and in vivo on the apoptosis induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The E1A gene has been successfully transfected into human cells both in vitro and in vivo using tgDCC-E1A (E1A-Lipid Complex), which consists of the E1A plasmid (pE1A-K2) complexed to the cationic lipid gene delivery system comprised of DC-Cholesterol 3b\[N-(N'N'-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoyl\] cholesterol hydrochloride and DOPE (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine).

* Rationale for Use of Cationic Lipids to Deliver DNA:

Cationic lipids can form complexes with negatively charged DNA plasmids and facilitate the transfer of genes to target cells. They are useful agents for delivery of gene therapy because they are synthesized chemically, are simple to manufacture, and pose no infectious risk. The cationic derivative of cholesterol, 3b\[N-(N'N'-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoyl\] cholesterol hydrochloride (DC-Chol) is an ideal cationic lipid for therapeutic use, as the cationic charge is provided by a non-toxic tertiary amine with a biodegradable carbamoyl bond. DC-Chol can be used to prepare liposomes in combination with the neutral 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE) with a DC-Chol to DOPE ratio of 6:4. This liposome combination can be mixed with a plasmid encoding E1A to form tgDCC-E1A.

The final preparation of tgDCC-E1A can be made within a range of lipid:DNA ratios, all of which have been shown in cell culture and in animal models to result in expression of E1A. Clinical trials of tgDCC-E1A for injection into solid tumors have used a final preparation with a lipid:DNA ratio of 1 nmol lipid to 1 microgram DNA \[tgDCC-E1A (1:1)\]. Early clinical trials evaluating intracavitary administration (e.g. intraperitoneal infusion for ovarian cancer) used a preparation with a lipid:DNA ratio of 10 nmol lipid to 1 microgram DNA \[tgDCC-E1A (10:1)\]. More recent protocols of intraperitoneal delivery for ovarian cancer have used a preparation with a lipid:DNA ratio of 3 nmol lipid to 1 microgram DNA \[tgDCC-E1A (3:1)\], as will this protocol.

* Rationale for Intraperitoneal Delivery of tgDCC-E1A:

The peritoneal cavity is a common site of tumor recurrence after initial "radical" surgical treatment of ovarian malignancies. Dissemination in this cavity is often widespread. Because of the unusual natural course of ovarian cancer (characterized by its tendency to be confined to the peritoneal cavity), control of metastatic disease in the peritoneal cavity is an important and challenging problem, which can be improved by direct delivery of drug into the peritoneal cavity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Paclitaxel + tgDCC-E1A

80 mg/m\^2 intravenous Paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) tgDCC-E1A starting dose 1.8 mg DNA/m\^2 weekly for six treatments every 7 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraperitoneal tgDCC-E1A

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Starting Dose Level: 1.8 mg DNA/m\^2 intraperitoneal every 7 days +/- 2 days for a total of 6 treatments each cycle.

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

80 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) every 7 days +/- 2 days for a total of 6 treatments.

Arm 2: Paclitaxel Alone

Weekly single agent intravenous Paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 for six treatments every 7 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

80 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) every 7 days +/- 2 days for a total of 6 treatments.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraperitoneal tgDCC-E1A

Starting Dose Level: 1.8 mg DNA/m\^2 intraperitoneal every 7 days +/- 2 days for a total of 6 treatments each cycle.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Paclitaxel

80 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) every 7 days +/- 2 days for a total of 6 treatments.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

E1A Taxol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 18 years
* Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer with histologic confirmation of the original tumor. Recurrent disease may be manifested as an elevated cancer antigen (CA)-125 using the following criteria: (a) increase in CA-125 to at least 2 times the upper limit of normal (assayed on 2 occasions at least 7 days apart) for subjects with a history of normal pre-treatment values or values that normalized with the most recent treatment - OR - (b) increase in CA-125 to 2 times the lowest observed value on the most recent treatment (assayed on two occasions at least 7 days apart) for subjects whose CA-125 did not normalize with the most recent treatment.
* Platinum-resistant disease, defined as recurrence less than six months after discontinuation of treatment with platinum therapy or platinum-refractory disease defined as progression on a platinum-containing regimen.
* A treatment-free interval of at least three weeks for cytotoxic therapies, radiation therapy, or other experimental drugs prior to first treatment on this protocol.
* A Zubrod performance status of two or less.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous administration of tgDCC-E1A.
* Progression on any taxane-containing regimen, or recurrent within 6 months of receiving a weekly taxane-containing regimen.

Previous radiation to more than 25% of marrow-bearing areas.

* Any of the following laboratory values: Hemoglobin \<9.0 gm/dl, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \<1.5 K/ml, platelet \<100 K/ml, creatinine \>2 mg/dl, bilirubin \>2 mg/dl, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)\>2 times the upper limit of normal, or abnormal coagulation profiles (\>2 seconds beyond upper range of normal Prothrombin Time (PT) or Partial thromboplastin time (PTT)).
* Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive status or active systemic infection.
* History of other invasive malignancies, except for non-melanoma skin cancer, unless there is no evidence of other cancer within the past 5 years.
* Patients with grade 2 or greater neurotoxicity.
* Patients with unstable angina or those who have had a myocardial infarction within the past six months. Patients with evidence of abnormal cardiac conduction are eligible if their disease has been stable for the past six months. Patients with an ejection fraction under 40%.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Naoto Ueno, MD, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mdanderson.org

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center official website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P50CA083639

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

ID02-321

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT02157870

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.