Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Primary Peritoneal or Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00003322

Last Updated: 2013-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

384 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving drugs in different ways may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether intravenous two-drug combination chemotherapy is more effective than intravenous and intraperitoneal infusions of three-drug combination chemotherapy for treating primary peritoneal or stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of intravenous two-drug combination chemotherapy with intravenous and intraperitoneal three-drug combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have primary peritoneal or stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare pathological response, recurrence-free interval, and survival in patients with optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma receiving intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and cisplatin vs IV paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin plus IP paclitaxel. II. Compare the toxic effects and complications of these 2 treatment regimens in these patients. III. Determine the frequency and prognostic significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in these patients. IV. Determine the effect of non-genetic risk factors on the course of disease in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma. V. Compare the quality of life of these patients receiving these treatments.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to gross residual disease (present vs absent) and whether second-look surgery will be performed at the end of treatment (yes vs no). Blood is drawn for BRCA mutation analysis and DNA extraction before the start of chemotherapy, but after randomization. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Patients in arm I receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by IV cisplatin on day 2. Patients in arm II receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin on day 2, plus IP paclitaxel on day 8. Treatment for both arms repeats every 3 weeks for a total of 6 treatment courses. Following chemotherapy, second look surgery is performed if selected by the patient. Quality-of-life assessments are performed prior to randomization, prior to course 4, 3-6 weeks after the completion of course 6 and prior to second look surgery if selected, 6 months after treatment is completed, and 12 months after treatment is completed. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 384 patients will be accrued for this study within 16 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

quality-of-life assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy Surgery: See Disease Characteristics No more than 6 weeks since prior surgery
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gynecologic Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deborah K. Armstrong, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Greater Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Women's Cancer Center

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Cancer Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital - Atlanta

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Atlanta Regional

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Cancer Research Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Central Illinois

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Evanston

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Cancer Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Oncology Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Medicine Branch

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Radiation Oncology Branch

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota Cancer Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Barnabas Medical Center

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Morristown Memorial Hospital

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

North Shore University Hospital

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Cancer Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

State University of New York Health Sciences Center - Stony Brook

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ireland Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma College of Medicine

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Sooner State

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbia River Program

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Abington Memorial Hospital

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Fox Chase Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Upstate Carolina

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Baptist Cancer Institute

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Brookview Research, Inc.

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center, University of Virginia HSC

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma General Hospital

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Barlin JN, Dao F, Bou Zgheib N, Ferguson SE, Sabbatini PJ, Hensley ML, Bell-McGuinn KM, Konner J, Tew WP, Aghajanian C, Chi DS. Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):621-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22446622 (View on PubMed)

Rubatt JM, Darcy KM, Tian C, Muggia F, Dhir R, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Niedernhofer LJ, Deloia J, Birrer M, Krivak TC. Pre-treatment tumor expression of ERCC1 in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer is not predictive of clinical outcomes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22261301 (View on PubMed)

Tian C, Ambrosone CB, Darcy KM, Krivak TC, Armstrong DK, Bookman MA, Davis W, Zhao H, Moysich K, Gallion H, DeLoia JA. Common variants in ABCB1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 genes and clinical outcomes among women with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.022. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22112610 (View on PubMed)

Hamilton CA, Miller A, Miller C, Krivak TC, Farley JH, Chernofsky MR, Stany MP, Rose GS, Markman M, Ozols RF, Armstrong DK, Maxwell GL. The impact of disease distribution on survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer cytoreduced to microscopic residual: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Sep;122(3):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.041. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21683993 (View on PubMed)

Aletti GD, Nordquist D, Hartmann L, Gallenberg M, Long HJ, Cliby WA. From randomized trial to practice: single institution experience using the GOG 172 i.p. chemotherapy regimen for ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1772-1778. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq025. Epub 2010 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20139154 (View on PubMed)

von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Gil KM, Gibbons HE, Monk BJ, Rose PG, Armstrong DK, Cella D, Wenzel L. A comparison of quality-of-life domains and clinical factors in ovarian cancer patients: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):839-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20471545 (View on PubMed)

Darcy KM, Tian C, Ambrosone CB, et al.: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study of associations between polymorphisms in ABC transporter genes (ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2) and outcome in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum and taxane chemotherapy. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-5567, 2009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Farley JH, Tian C, Rose GS, Brown CL, Birrer M, Maxwell GL. Race does not impact outcome for advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with cisplatin/paclitaxel: an analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group trials. Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4210-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24482.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19536873 (View on PubMed)

Zorn KK, Tian C, McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Markman M, Muggia FM, Rose PG, Ozols RF, Spriggs D, Armstrong DK. The prognostic value of pretreatment CA 125 in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1028-35. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24084.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19156927 (View on PubMed)

Havrilesky LJ, Secord AA, Darcy KM, Armstrong DK, Kulasingam S; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 1;26(25):4144-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1961.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18757328 (View on PubMed)

Bristow RE, Santillan A, Salani R, Diaz-Montes TP, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Meisner BC, Armstrong DK, Frick KD. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Sep;106(3):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.043. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17688927 (View on PubMed)

Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, Markman M, Armstrong DK, Muggia F, McGuire WP; Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3621-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17704411 (View on PubMed)

Alberts DS, Delforge A. Maximizing the delivery of intraperitoneal therapy while minimizing drug toxicity and maintaining quality of life. Semin Oncol. 2006 Dec;33(6 Suppl 12):S8-17. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.11.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17223445 (View on PubMed)

Armstrong DK, Brady MF. Intraperitoneal therapy for ovarian cancer: a treatment ready for prime time. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4531-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7140. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17008690 (View on PubMed)

Markman M. Clinical efficacy supporting the role of intraperitoneal drug delivery in the primary chemotherapeutic management of small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol. 2006 Dec;33(6 Suppl 12):S3-7. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.11.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17223444 (View on PubMed)

Singhal P, Lele S. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: where are we now? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006 Oct;4(9):941-6. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2006.0077.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17020670 (View on PubMed)

Baysal BE, DeLoia JA, Willett-Brozick JE, Goodman MT, Brady MF, Modugno F, Lynch HT, Conley YP, Watson P, Gallion HH. Analysis of CHEK2 gene for ovarian cancer susceptibility. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15385111 (View on PubMed)

Armstrong DK, Bundy BN, Baergen R, et al.: Randomized phase III study of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and cisplatin versus IV paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin and IP paclitaxel in optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (OC): a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG 172). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-803, 2002.

Reference Type RESULT

Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16394300 (View on PubMed)

DeLoia JA, Krivak T, Darcy KM, et al.: Relationship between the C8092A polymorphisms in ERCC1 and clinical outcome in optimally-resected, stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal or intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] American Association for Cancer Research: 98th Annual Meeting, April 14-18, 2007, Los Angeles, CA. A-1674, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Krivak TC, Darcy KM, Tian C, et al.: Relationship between polymorphisms in cordon 118 and C8092A in ERCC1 and clinical outcome in optimally-resected, stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal or intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-21050, 733s, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Krivak TC, Darcy KM, Tian C, Armstrong D, Baysal BE, Gallion H, Ambrosone CB, DeLoia JA; Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase III Trial. Relationship between ERCC1 polymorphisms, disease progression, and survival in the Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of intraperitoneal versus intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3598-606. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.1323.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18640939 (View on PubMed)

Krivak TC, Tian C, Rose GS, Armstrong DK, Maxwell GL. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study of serum CA-125 levels in patients with stage III optimally debulked ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal compared to intravenous chemotherapy: an analysis of patients enrolled in GOG 172. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct;115(1):81-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jul 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19596139 (View on PubMed)

Krivak T, Darcy K, Tian C, et al.: Relationship between polymorphisms in ERCC1 and clinical outcome in optimally resected stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2007 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 3-7, 2007, San Diego, CA. A-146, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Seamon LG, Carlson MJ, Richardson DL, et al.: Improved intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic toxicity profile for ovarian cancer: A modification of the taxane-platinum protocol in GOG-172. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-5583, 2008.

Reference Type RESULT

Thrall M, Gallion HH, Kryscio R, Kapali M, Armstrong DK, DeLoia JA. BRCA1 expression in a large series of sporadic ovarian carcinomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Jan-Feb;16 Suppl 1:166-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00504.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16515585 (View on PubMed)

von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Gil KM, Frasure HE, Armstrong DK, Wenzel LB. The association between quality of life domains and overall survival in ovarian cancer patients during adjuvant chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):379-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.032. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22119995 (View on PubMed)

Walker JL, Armstrong D, Huang H, et al.: Intraperitoneal catheter outcomes on GOG 172: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study in women with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 (Suppl 1): A-062, 19, 2004.

Reference Type RESULT

Walker JL, Armstrong DK, Huang HQ, Fowler J, Webster K, Burger RA, Clarke-Pearson D. Intraperitoneal catheter outcomes in a phase III trial of intravenous versus intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimal stage III ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Jan;100(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.013.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16368440 (View on PubMed)

Wenzel LB, Huang HQ, Armstrong DK, et al.: Baseline quality of life (QOL) as a predictor of tolerance to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-5007, 257s, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Wenzel LB, Huang HQ, Armstrong DK, Walker JL, Cella D; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Health-related quality of life during and after intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy for optimally debulked ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 1;25(4):437-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3494.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17264340 (View on PubMed)

Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Cella D, Walker JL, Armstrong DK; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Validation of FACT/GOG-AD subscale for ovarian cancer-related abdominal discomfort: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jul;110(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Apr 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18430468 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GOG-0172

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000066273

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.