Long-term Study of Nateglinide+Valsartan to Prevent or Delay Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Complications
NCT ID: NCT00097786
Last Updated: 2023-11-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
9306 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-01-31
2009-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vildagliptin vs. Glibenclamide in Endothelial Function in Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension
NCT02145611
Vildagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Combination With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00106340
A 24-week Open-Label, Phase 3b Trial With a 28-week Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin Co-administered With Dapagliflozin Compared to Insulin Glargine in Subjects withType 2 Diabetes Who Have Glycemic Control on Metformin
NCT02551874
Metformin Versus Vildagliptin for Diabetic Hypertensive Patients
NCT03253562
Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin Compared to Placebo on the Incretin Effect in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin
NCT00396071
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg
For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took the combination of nateglinide 30 mg (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and valsartan 80 mg (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to nateglinide 60 mg ac and valsartan 160 mg od.
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo
For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took valsartan 80 mg capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning). After 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated to 160 mg valsartan od. Patients also received nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals).
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo
For the first 2 weeks of treatment, patients took nateglinide 30 mg tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals). After 2 weeks, patients were uptitrated to 60 mg nateglinide ac. Patients also received valsartan placebo capsules (once daily \[od\] in the morning).
Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Placebo
Patients took 3 nateglinide placebo tablets (3 times daily, ante cibum \[ac\] before meals) and 1 valsartan placebo capsule (once daily \[od\] in the morning).
Valsartan placebo + nateglinide placebo
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide 60 mg
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Valsartan 160 mg + nateglinide placebo
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Nateglinide 60 mg + valsartan placebo
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Valsartan placebo + nateglinide placebo
The double-blinding of the randomized study medication was maintained by the use of identical placebo and active tablets and capsules for nateglinide and valsartan, respectively. Patients were instructed not to take the morning dose of either medication nor to eat breakfast on the day of a scheduled study visit, but to wait until after the visit was completed. Patients not tolerating the higher dose (Level 2) were down-titrated to receive Level 1. Patients not tolerating the lower dose (Level 1) had a treatment interruption. Starting at Week 2 and throughout the study, attempts were to be made to reach the highest dose level (Level 2), if medically acceptable. Following each change in dose level or re-initiation of treatment, tolerability was assessed after 2 weeks of exposure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Impaired glucose tolerance
* Age dependent risk factors
Exclusion Criteria
For detailed information, call contact person.
50 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Multiple Locations, New Jersey, United States
Investigative Site, , Argentina
Investigative Site, , Australia
Multiple Locations, , Austria
Investigative Site, , Belgium
Investigative Site, , Brazil
Investigative Site, , Canada
Investigative Site, , Chile
Investigative Site, , China
Investigative Site, , Colombia
Investigative Site, , Czechia
Investigative Site, , Denmark
Investigative Site, , Ecuador
Investigative Site, , Finland
Investigative Site, , France
Investigative Site, , Germany
Investigative Site, , Greece
Investigative Site, , Guatemala
Investigative Site, , Hong Kong
Investigative Site, , Hungary
Investigative Site, , Italy
Investigative Site, , Malaysia
Investigative Site, , Mexico
Investigative Site, , Netherlands
Investigative Site, , Norway
Investigative Site, , Peru
Investigative Site, , Poland
Investigative Site, , Russia
Investigative Site, , Singapore
Investigative Site, , Slovakia
Investigative Site, , South Africa
Investigative Site, , Spain
Investigative Site, , Sweden
Investigative Site, , Switzerland
Investigative Site, , Taiwan
Investigative Site, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Investigative Site, , United Kingdom
Investigative Site, , Uruguay
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harumi Higuchi Dos Santos M, Sharma A, Sun JL, Pieper K, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Lopes RD. International Variation in Outcomes Among People with Cardiovascular Disease or Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Insights from the NAVIGATOR Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jan 13;6(1):e003892. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003892.
Preiss D, Thomas LE, Wojdyla DM, Haffner SM, Gill JM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Kraus WE; NAVIGATOR Investigators. Prospective relationships between body weight and physical activity: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 14;5(8):e007901. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007901.
Katz M, Califf RM, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Thomas L, Lopes RD. Venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular risk: results from the NAVIGATOR trial. Am J Med. 2015 Mar;128(3):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Preiss D, Haffner SM, Thomas LE, Sun JL, Sattar N, Yates T, J Davies M, McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Califf RM, Kraus WE. Change in levels of physical activity after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: an observational analysis from the NAVIGATOR study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Dec;16(12):1265-8. doi: 10.1111/dom.12320. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Huffman KM, Sun JL, Thomas L, Bales CW, Califf RM, Yates T, Davies MJ, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Haffner SM, Kraus WE. Impact of baseline physical activity and diet behavior on metabolic syndrome in a pharmaceutical trial: results from NAVIGATOR. Metabolism. 2014 Apr;63(4):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Yates T, Haffner SM, Schulte PJ, Thomas L, Huffman KM, Bales CW, Califf RM, Holman RR, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Tuomilehto J, Davies MJ, Kraus WE. Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial): a cohort analysis. Lancet. 2014 Mar 22;383(9922):1059-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62061-9. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
Shen L, Shah BR, Reyes EM, Thomas L, Wojdyla D, Diem P, Leiter LA, Charbonnel B, Mareev V, Horton ES, Haffner SM, Soska V, Holman R, Bethel MA, Schaper F, Sun JL, McMurray JJ, Califf RM, Krum H. Role of diuretics, beta blockers, and statins in increasing the risk of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: reanalysis of data from the NAVIGATOR study. BMJ. 2013 Dec 9;347:f6745. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6745.
NAVIGATOR Study Group; McMurray JJ, Holman RR, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1477-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001121. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
NAVIGATOR Study Group; Holman RR, Haffner SM, McMurray JJ, Bethel MA, Holzhauer B, Hua TA, Belenkov Y, Boolell M, Buse JB, Buckley BM, Chacra AR, Chiang FT, Charbonnel B, Chow CC, Davies MJ, Deedwania P, Diem P, Einhorn D, Fonseca V, Fulcher GR, Gaciong Z, Gaztambide S, Giles T, Horton E, Ilkova H, Jenssen T, Kahn SE, Krum H, Laakso M, Leiter LA, Levitt NS, Mareev V, Martinez F, Masson C, Mazzone T, Meaney E, Nesto R, Pan C, Prager R, Raptis SA, Rutten GE, Sandstroem H, Schaper F, Scheen A, Schmitz O, Sinay I, Soska V, Stender S, Tamas G, Tognoni G, Tuomilehto J, Villamil AS, Vozar J, Califf RM. Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1463-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001122. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
Krum H, McMurray JJ, Horton E, Gerlock T, Holzhauer B, Zuurman L, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, Holman RR, Califf RM. Baseline characteristics of the Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial population: comparison with other diabetes prevention trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Apr;28(2):124-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00146.x. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
Bethel MA, Deedwania P, Levitt NS, Schmitz O, Huntsman-Labed A, Califf RM, Haffner SM, Diem P; NAVIGATOR Study Group. Metabolic syndrome and alanine aminotransferase: a global perspective from the NAVIGATOR screening population. Diabet Med. 2009 Dec;26(12):1204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02864.x.
Bethel MA, Holman R, Haffner SM, Califf RM, Huntsman-Labed A, Hua TA, McMurray J. Determining the most appropriate components for a composite clinical trial outcome. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDJN608B2302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.