Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy With or Without Hyperthermia Therapy in Treating Patients With Cervical Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00085631

Last Updated: 2013-09-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Hyperthermia therapy kills tumor cells by heating them to several degrees above body temperature. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy and radiation therapy are more effective with or without hyperthermia therapy in treating cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial compared the safety and efficacy of cisplatin and radiation therapy, together with hyperthermia therapy versus cisplatin and radiation therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Compare local control, failure-free survival, and overall survival of patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix treated with cisplatin and radiotherapy alone, versus cisplatin and radiotherapy with hyperthermia .

OUTLINE:

This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, disease stage (IIB or IIIA vs IIIB or IVA) and age (\< 60 years vs ≥ 60 years). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

LIMITATIONS:

There are integrity issues with the currently available data, involving international institutions, in that several pieces of information relating to patient accrual and outcomes cannot be verified. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to report outcome measures for this study. Baseline measures of age and gender are reported for the entire study cohort. Participant flow is reported by treatment arm assignment, which was available for a majority of patients in the currently available data. Adverse events are reported for the entire cohort, as some adverse events could not be classified within a particular treatment arm.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

stage IA cervical cancer stage IB cervical cancer stage IIA cervical cancer stage IIB cervical cancer stage III cervical cancer stage IVA cervical cancer cervical adenocarcinoma cervical adenosquamous cell carcinoma cervical squamous cell carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I

Patients received cisplatin IV and concurrently underwent hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes on day 1. Patients also underwent external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5. Treatment repeated weekly for 5-6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of chemoradiotherapy and hyperthermia, patients underwent brachytherapy to the cervix for 2-3 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

hyperthermia treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients undergo hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes

brachytherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients undergo brachytherapy for 2-3 days

external beam radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5

Arm II

Patients received cisplatin and undergo external beam radiation therapy (and brachytherapy) as in arm I.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

brachytherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients undergo brachytherapy for 2-3 days

external beam radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cisplatin

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

hyperthermia treatment

Patients undergo hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

brachytherapy

Patients undergo brachytherapy for 2-3 days

Intervention Type RADIATION

external beam radiation therapy

Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Platinol-AQ

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Invasive cervical carcinoma (squamous, adeno or adenosquamous histologies, small cell histology excluded)

* age \>18years
* International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics ((FIGO) stage IB2, IIA-IVA, FIGO stages IA, IB1 with positive pelvic lymph nodes or parametria either on imaging techniques or pathologically involved at the time of surgery.

patients undergoing surgical removal of the cervix and uterus are not eligible, parametria either on imaging techniques or pathologically involved at the time • Performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)/World Health Organisation (WHO) 0, 1 or \>/=70%respectively White Blood count (WBC) ≥ 3,000, platelets ≥ 100,000, Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \> 1500

• serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal, transaminase ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal calculated creatinine clearance \>60milliliters (mls)/liter ( Cockcroft) OR creatinine \</= 2.0mgs% paraaortic adenopathy absent or 1.5 centimeter (cm) in greatest dimension on Computerised Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan;

No history of myocardial infarction in the last 6 months no symptomatic angina pectoris negative pregnancy test in patients under 50 Hemoglobin \>12.0 Gd/dl or \>7.5 mmo;/L with transfusion if needed written written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

surgical resection of the primary tumor (i.e. Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH)/ Bilateral salpingoophorectomy (BSO)

* patients with pacemakers or implanted defibrillators
* patients with significant metallic foreign bodies (i.e. hip replacements, bone metallic rods,orthopedic plates, etc.)
* prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mark Dewhirst

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mark Dewhirst

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ellen L. Jones, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Cancer Institute

Leonard R. Prosnitz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Cancer Institute

Mark Dewhirst, DVM PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Cancer Institute

Zeljko Vujaskovic, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke Cancer Institute

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Netherlands Norway United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DUMC-4516

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000370860

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Pro00005267

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id