Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy With or Without Hyperthermia Therapy in Treating Patients With Cervical Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00085631
Last Updated: 2013-09-17
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
101 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-03-31
2009-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial compared the safety and efficacy of cisplatin and radiation therapy, together with hyperthermia therapy versus cisplatin and radiation therapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Compare local control, failure-free survival, and overall survival of patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix treated with cisplatin and radiotherapy alone, versus cisplatin and radiotherapy with hyperthermia .
OUTLINE:
This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, disease stage (IIB or IIIA vs IIIB or IVA) and age (\< 60 years vs ≥ 60 years). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
LIMITATIONS:
There are integrity issues with the currently available data, involving international institutions, in that several pieces of information relating to patient accrual and outcomes cannot be verified. Therefore, it would be inappropriate to report outcome measures for this study. Baseline measures of age and gender are reported for the entire study cohort. Participant flow is reported by treatment arm assignment, which was available for a majority of patients in the currently available data. Adverse events are reported for the entire cohort, as some adverse events could not be classified within a particular treatment arm.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I
Patients received cisplatin IV and concurrently underwent hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes on day 1. Patients also underwent external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5. Treatment repeated weekly for 5-6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of chemoradiotherapy and hyperthermia, patients underwent brachytherapy to the cervix for 2-3 days.
cisplatin
Given IV
hyperthermia treatment
Patients undergo hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes
brachytherapy
Patients undergo brachytherapy for 2-3 days
external beam radiation therapy
Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5
Arm II
Patients received cisplatin and undergo external beam radiation therapy (and brachytherapy) as in arm I.
cisplatin
Given IV
brachytherapy
Patients undergo brachytherapy for 2-3 days
external beam radiation therapy
Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cisplatin
Given IV
hyperthermia treatment
Patients undergo hyperthermia treatment over 60-90 minutes
brachytherapy
Patients undergo brachytherapy for 2-3 days
external beam radiation therapy
Patients undergo external beam radiation therapy once daily on days 1-5
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age \>18years
* International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics ((FIGO) stage IB2, IIA-IVA, FIGO stages IA, IB1 with positive pelvic lymph nodes or parametria either on imaging techniques or pathologically involved at the time of surgery.
patients undergoing surgical removal of the cervix and uterus are not eligible, parametria either on imaging techniques or pathologically involved at the time • Performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)/World Health Organisation (WHO) 0, 1 or \>/=70%respectively White Blood count (WBC) ≥ 3,000, platelets ≥ 100,000, Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \> 1500
• serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal, transaminase ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal calculated creatinine clearance \>60milliliters (mls)/liter ( Cockcroft) OR creatinine \</= 2.0mgs% paraaortic adenopathy absent or 1.5 centimeter (cm) in greatest dimension on Computerised Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan;
No history of myocardial infarction in the last 6 months no symptomatic angina pectoris negative pregnancy test in patients under 50 Hemoglobin \>12.0 Gd/dl or \>7.5 mmo;/L with transfusion if needed written written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with pacemakers or implanted defibrillators
* patients with significant metallic foreign bodies (i.e. hip replacements, bone metallic rods,orthopedic plates, etc.)
* prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Northwestern University
OTHER
Mark Dewhirst
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mark Dewhirst
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ellen L. Jones, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Cancer Institute
Leonard R. Prosnitz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Cancer Institute
Mark Dewhirst, DVM PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Cancer Institute
Zeljko Vujaskovic, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DUMC-4516
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000370860
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Pro00005267
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id