Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Rituximab in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00064116

Last Updated: 2020-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

824 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-05-08

Study Completion Date

2014-01-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can locate cancer cells and either kill them or deliver cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without rituximab in treating patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying four different combination chemotherapy regimens and rituximab to see how well they work compared to four different combination chemotherapy regimens alone in treating patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the time to treatment failure in patients with CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)-like chemotherapy with vs without rituximab.
* Compare the tumor control, progression rate, and complete remission rate in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the disease-free and overall survival rate of patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, bulky disease (no vs yes), International Prognostic Index score (0 vs 1), and chemotherapy (CHOP vs CHOEP vs PMitCEBO vs MACOP-B). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive 1 of the following chemotherapy regimens according to participating country:

* CHOP: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1 and oral prednisone or prednisolone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* CHOEP-21: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1; etoposide IV on days 1-3; and oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* PMitCEBO: Patients receive mitoxantrone IV, cyclophosphamide IV, and etoposide IV on day 1; vincristine IV and bleomycin IV on day 8; and oral prednisolone daily during weeks 1-4 and every other day during week 5. Treatment repeats every 14 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* MACOP-B: Patients receive cyclophosphamide IV and doxorubicin IV on days 1, 15, 29, 43, 57, and 71; methotrexate IV and vincristine IV on days 8, 36, and 64; bleomycin IV and vincristine IV on days 22, 50, and 78; and oral or intramuscular prednisone on days 1-84. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients receive arm I regimens (according to participating country) and rituximab as follows:

* CHOP and rituximab: Patients receive CHOP as in arm I and rituximab IV on day 1.
* CHOEP-21 and rituximab: Patients receive CHOEP-21 as in arm I and rituximab IV on day 1.
* PMitCEBO and rituximab: Patients receive PMitCEBO as in arm I and rituximab IV on day 1 during courses 1 and 4; on day 8 during courses 2 and 5; and on day 1 at 1 and 4 weeks after completion of the last course of PMitCEBO chemotherapy.
* MACOP-B and rituximab: Patients receive MACOP-B as in arm I and rituximab IV on days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, and 106.

Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 820 patients will be accrued for this study within approximately 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: CHOP-21

Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Doxorubicin 50 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Vincristine 2 mg (abs.) i.v. day 1 Prednisone 100 mg/d p.o. days 1 to 5 Recycle: day 22 Total number of cycles 6

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CHOP regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Doxorubicin 50 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Vincristine 2 mg (abs.) i.v. day 1 Prednisone 100 mg/d p.o. days 1 to 5 Recycle day 22 Total number of cycles: 6

Arm B: CHOP-21 + Rituximab

Rituximab 375 mg/m² i.v. day 1\* Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Doxorubicin 50 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Vincristine 2 mg (abs.) i.v. day 1 Prednisone 100 mg/d p.o. days 1 to 5 Recycle day 22 Total number of cycles: 6

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituximab 375 mg/m² i.v. day 1

CHOP regimen

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Doxorubicin 50 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Vincristine 2 mg (abs.) i.v. day 1 Prednisone 100 mg/d p.o. days 1 to 5 Recycle day 22 Total number of cycles: 6

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rituximab

Rituximab 375 mg/m² i.v. day 1

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

CHOP regimen

Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Doxorubicin 50 mg/m² i.v. day 1 Vincristine 2 mg (abs.) i.v. day 1 Prednisone 100 mg/d p.o. days 1 to 5 Recycle day 22 Total number of cycles: 6

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma according to REAL classification

* Diagnosed within the past 6 weeks
* CD20+ disease
* Ann Arbor stage II, III, or IV disease or stage I bulky disease
* International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 0 or 1

* Score 0 defined by all of the following:

* Stage I or II disease
* ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
* Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) no greater than upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Score 1 defined by 1 of the following:

* Stage I or II disease; ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; and LDH greater than ULN
* Stage I or II disease; ECOG performance status 2 or 3; and LDH no greater than ULN
* Stage III or IV disease; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and LDH no greater than ULN
* Previously untreated disease
* Mediastinal B-cell lymphoma allowed
* No secondary lymphoma after prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for other malignancies
* No transformed lymphoma
* No primary CNS lymphoma
* No primary gastrointestinal (MALT) lymphoma
* No post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

* 18 to 60

Performance status

* See Disease Characteristics
* ECOG 0-3

Life expectancy

* At least 3 months

Hematopoietic

* Not specified

Hepatic

* Bilirubin no greater than 2.0 mg/dL\*
* Transaminases no greater than 3 times normal\*
* No active chronic hepatitis B or C infection NOTE: \*Unless related to lymphoma

Renal

* Creatinine no greater than 2 times normal\* NOTE: \*Unless related to lymphoma

Cardiovascular

* No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
* No uncompensated heart failure
* No dilatative cardiomyopathy
* No coronary heart disease with ST segment depression on ECG
* No severe uncompensated hypertension

Pulmonary

* No chronic lung disease with hypoxemia

Other

* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* HIV negative
* No known allergic reactions against foreign proteins
* No other prior malignancy except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* No concurrent disease that would preclude study treatment
* No active infections requiring systemic antibiotics or antiviral medications
* No severe uncompensated diabetes mellitus
* No clinical signs of cerebral dysfunction
* No severe psychiatric disease

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* No prior murine antibodies

Chemotherapy

* No other concurrent anticancer chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

* Not specified

Radiotherapy

* No concurrent response-adapted (slow response or unconfirmed complete response) radiotherapy

Surgery

* Not specified

Other

* No prior lymphoma-specific treatment
* More than 12 weeks since prior participation in another clinical trial
* No prior participation in this study
* No other concurrent study medication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NCIC Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin Imrie, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

The Moncton Hospital

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

QEII Health Sciences Center

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Grand River Regional Cancer Centre

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Regional Cancer Program

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Health Research Institute - General Division

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Niagara Health System

St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Odette Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Univ. Health Network-The Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Trillium Health Centre - West Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

PEI Cancer Treatment Centre,Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Charles LeMoyne

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill University - Dept. Oncology

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Allan Blair Cancer Centre

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pfreundschuh M, Ho AD, Cavallin-Stahl E, Wolf M, Pettengell R, Vasova I, Belch A, Walewski J, Zinzani PL, Mingrone W, Kvaloy S, Shpilberg O, Jaeger U, Hansen M, Corrado C, Scheliga A, Loeffler M, Kuhnt E; MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Prognostic significance of maximum tumour (bulk) diameter in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab: an exploratory analysis of the MabThera International Trial Group (MInT) study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):435-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70078-0. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18400558 (View on PubMed)

Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A, Pettengell R, Trneny M, Imrie K, Ma D, Gill D, Walewski J, Zinzani PL, Stahel R, Kvaloy S, Shpilberg O, Jaeger U, Hansen M, Lehtinen T, Lopez-Guillermo A, Corrado C, Scheliga A, Milpied N, Mendila M, Rashford M, Kuhnt E, Loeffler M; MabThera International Trial Group. CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol. 2006 May;7(5):379-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70664-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16648042 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAN-NCIC-LY9

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ROCHE-CAN-NCIC-LY9

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MINT-M39045

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000309053

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LY9

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.