Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-11-30
2009-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study hypotheses: 1) Ankle motion during distraction will result in clinically significant improvements in Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale scores, SF-36 scores, and improved cartilage thickness distribution over the habitually most heavily loaded portion of the articular surface, as compared to the use of distraction without ankle motion. 2a) Ankles with low geometric surface irregularity and greater range of motion will have better preservation of neo-chondroid tissue (increased normalized cartilage thickness and reduced longitudinal compressive strain in the habitually heavily regions of the articular surface) than those with high surface irregularity. 2b) Low geometric surface irregularity and greater range of motion will have reduced habitual focal or regional contact stress elevation. 3) Joints that have better improvements in Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale scores and improved cartilage thickness distribution over habitually heavily loaded portion of the articular surface will have improved normalization of synovial fluid markers of biosynthetic/degradative activity and oxidative stress.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biologic Mechanisms for Pain Variation After Physical Activity in Osteoarthritis
NCT03344913
Movement Dynamics of Knee Osteoarthritis and Total Knee Replacement
NCT06829433
Exercise and Pain Sensitivity in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01545258
Knee Brace and Biomechanical Footwear in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.
NCT03684850
Accelerated Rehabilitation in Individuals After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07319546
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Group A will be treated with mechanical distraction with motion; Group B will be treated with mechanical distraction without motion. Participants will be followed for 28 months and will have 11 study visits. Most of the study visits will occur during the first half of the study. State-of-the-art techniques for clinical assessment, articular surface imaging, biomechanical modeling, and biochemical testing will be used in this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Group A participants will be treated with mechanical distraction with motion
Ankle distraction permitting motion
External fixator is applied to ankle joint for 85 - 95 days; ankle motion is permitted
Group B
Group B participants will be treated with mechanical distraction without motion
Ankle distraction without motion
External fixator is applied to ankel joint for 85 - 95 days; ankle motion is not permitted
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ankle distraction permitting motion
External fixator is applied to ankle joint for 85 - 95 days; ankle motion is permitted
Ankle distraction without motion
External fixator is applied to ankel joint for 85 - 95 days; ankle motion is not permitted
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Skeletally mature (children included if they have no open growth plates)
* Failure of less than 1 year nonoperative treatment, including 3 months of continuous treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and 3 months of unloading treatment (i.e., unloading brace, crutches, cane, walker)
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
NIH
Ned Amendola
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ned Amendola
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph A. Buckwalter, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Thomas D. Brown, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buckwalter JA. Sports, joint injury, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Oct;33(10):578-88. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.10.578.
Buckwalter JA, Brown TD. Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jun;(423):7-16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.