Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Filgrastim and/or Tretinoin in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00005863

Last Updated: 2013-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-08-31

Study Completion Date

2004-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim may increase the number of immune cells found in bone marrow or peripheral blood and may help a person's immune system recover from the side effects of chemotherapy. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy with filgrastim and/or tretinoin is more effective than combination chemotherapy alone for acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying combination chemotherapy with filgrastim and/or tretinoin to see how well they work compared to combination chemotherapy alone in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare standard induction chemotherapy with cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide vs fludarabine and cytarabine in terms of achievement of remission, reasons for remission failure, duration of remission, survival, toxicity, and supportive care needs in patients with high risk acute myeloid leukemia.
* Determine if the use of filgrastim (G-CSF) or tretinoin administered during and following chemotherapy improves outcome in this patient population.
* Determine the impact of these treatment regimens on quality of life in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to type of disease (resistant vs refractory vs relapsed vs adverse cytogenetic), age (under 15 vs 15 to 29, vs 30 to 49 vs 50-59 vs 60-69 vs 70 and over), performance status, and de novo and secondary leukemia. Patients with relapsed disease are further stratified according to duration of first remission (less than 6 months vs 6 to 12 months vs 12 months and over), and prior transplantation (yes vs no).

Patients are randomized into one of two treatment arms for induction chemotherapy.

* Arm I: Patients receive induction chemotherapy consisting of cytarabine IV every 12 hours on days 1-10, daunorubicin IV on days 1, 3, and 5 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Patients receive a second course of therapy with cytarabine IV every 12 hours on days 1-8 and daunorubicin and etoposide as in course 1.
* Arm II: Patients receive 2 courses of induction chemotherapy consisting of fludarabine IV over 30 minutes followed by cytarabine IV over 4 hours on days 1-5.

Patients are further randomized into one of two treatment arms for colony stimulating factor therapy.

* Arm I: Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) subcutaneously or IV daily beginning on day 1 of each course of induction chemotherapy and continuing until blood counts recover, for up to a maximum of 28 days.
* Arm II: Patients receive no G-CSF during and following induction chemotherapy. Patients are further randomized into one of two treatment arms for retinoid therapy.
* Arm I: Patients receive oral tretinoin daily beginning on day 1 of induction chemotherapy and continuing for up to a maximum of 90 days.
* Arm II: Patients receive no retinoid therapy during and following induction chemotherapy.

Following completion of induction chemotherapy, patients achieving complete remission and blood count recovery may receive subsequent therapy consisting of consolidation chemotherapy and/or autologous or allogeneic transplantation.

Quality of life is assessed at 3 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 800-1,000 patients will be accrued for this study within 4-5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

recurrent childhood acute myeloid leukemia recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission childhood acute myeloid leukemia in remission adult acute erythroid leukemia (M6) adult acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1) adult acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2) adult acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4) adult acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a) adult acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7) childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation (M1) childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation (M2) childhood acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4) childhood acute monoblastic leukemia (M5a) childhood acute monocytic leukemia (M5b) childhood acute erythroleukemia (M6) childhood acute megakaryocytic leukemia (M7) secondary acute myeloid leukemia de novo myelodysplastic syndromes adult acute monocytic leukemia (M5b) previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes secondary myelodysplastic syndromes adult acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0) childhood acute minimally differentiated myeloid leukemia (M0) atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22) adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22) adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22) childhood myelodysplastic syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

filgrastim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

fludarabine phosphate

Intervention Type DRUG

tretinoin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) including de novo or secondary AML, or a preexisting myelodysplastic syndrome

* Overt resistant disease with more than 15% bone marrow blasts after induction course
* Primary refractory disease

* Failure to achieve first complete remission after at least 2 induction courses
* Relapse from first remission with more than 5% bone marrow blasts
* Complete or partial remission following 1 induction course with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis
* No acute promyelocytic leukemia
* No chronic myeloid leukemia in blast transformation
* No prior relapse from a second or greater remission

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

* Any age

Performance status:

* Not specified

Life expectancy:

* Not specified

Hematopoietic:

* Not specified

Hepatic:

* Not specified

Renal:

* Creatinine clearance at least 30 mL/min

Other:

* No other active malignancy
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* Not specified

Chemotherapy

* See Disease Characteristics

Endocrine therapy

* Not specified

Radiotherapy

* Not specified

Surgery

* Not specified
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Council

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

D. W. Milligan, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

Birmingham, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burnett AK, Milligan D, Hills RK, et al.: Does all-transretinoic acid (ATRA) have a role in non-APL acute myeloid leukaemia? Results from 1666 patients in three MRC trials. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-1794, 2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Milligan DW, Wheatley K, Littlewood T, Craig JI, Burnett AK; NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Fludarabine and cytosine are less effective than standard ADE chemotherapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia, and addition of G-CSF and ATRA are not beneficial: results of the MRC AML-HR randomized trial. Blood. 2006 Jun 15;107(12):4614-22. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4202. Epub 2006 Feb 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16484584 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MRC-LEUK-AML-HR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000067895

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id