Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2

NCT ID: NCT00004067

Last Updated: 2021-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-02-29

Study Completion Date

2019-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel, use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy plus trastuzumab is more effective than combination chemotherapy alone for treating breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well giving combination chemotherapy together with trastuzumab works compared to combination chemotherapy alone in treating women with node-positive stage II or stage IIIA breast cancer that overexpresses HER2.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab (Herceptin®) in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer that overexpresses HER2.
* Compare the effect of these regimens on disease-free and overall survival of these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to number of positive nodes (1-3 vs 4-9 vs 10 or more), administration of hormonal therapy (tamoxifen vs anastrozole vs neither), surgery/radiotherapy (lumpectomy plus breast irradiation vs lumpectomy plus breast irradiation plus regional irradiation vs mastectomy without radiotherapy vs mastectomy with radiotherapy), paclitaxel schedule (every 3 weeks vs weekly), and participating center. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

* Arm 1: Patients receive doxorubicin IV and cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses. Approximately 3 weeks after the last course, patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours every 21 days for 4 courses OR paclitaxel IV over 1 hour once weekly for 12 weeks (12 doses).
* Arm 2: Patients receive chemotherapy as in arm I and trastuzumab (Herceptin®) IV over 90 minutes on day 1 of the first course of paclitaxel. Trastuzumab is then administered IV over 30 minutes weekly for 51 weeks, beginning on day 8.

All patients with estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive tumors receive hormonal therapy\* for at least 5 years, beginning within 3-12 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy. Patients who have received prior tamoxifen for prevention may be treated with additional tamoxifen for no more than 5 years at the discretion of the principal investigator (PI).

NOTE: \*Other hormonal therapeutic agents are allowed in sequence with or as an alternative to tamoxifen therapy.

All patients previously treated with lumpectomy undergo breast irradiation beginning after completion of chemotherapy and concurrently with trastuzumab (in arm 2) administration. Patients previously treated with mastectomy may also receive radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is administered daily for 5-6 weeks.

Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,700 patients will be accrued for this study within 4.75 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: adriamycin + cyclophosphamide then taxol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

adriamycin

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/m2 IV push every 21 days for 4 cycles.

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 4 cycles

taxol

Intervention Type DRUG

175 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 4 cycles

Arm 2: adriamycin + cyclophosphamide then taxol + herceptin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

herceptin

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly for 1 year.

adriamycin

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg/m2 IV push every 21 days for 4 cycles.

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

600 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 4 cycles

taxol

Intervention Type DRUG

175 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 4 cycles

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

herceptin

4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly for 1 year.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

adriamycin

60 mg/m2 IV push every 21 days for 4 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

600 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 4 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

taxol

175 mg/m2 IV every 21 days for 4 cycles

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

trastuzumab doxorubicin paclitaxel

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient must have a life expectancy of at least 10 years, excluding her diagnosis of breast cancer. (Comorbid conditions should be taken into consideration, but not the diagnosis of breast cancer.)
* The interval between the last surgery for breast cancer treatment (lumpectomy, mastectomy, axillary dissection, or re-excision of lumpectomy margins) and randomization must be less than or equal to 84 days.
* All of the following staging criteria must be met:

* Primary tumor must be T1-3 by clinical and pathologic evaluation.
* Ipsilateral nodes must be cN0-1 by clinical evaluation.
* Ipsilateral nodes must be pN1, pN2a, or pN3a by pathologic evaluation.
* M0
* Patients must have undergone either a total mastectomy and an axillary dissection or a lumpectomy and an axillary dissection. Sentinel node biopsy is permitted, but must be followed by an axillary dissection.
* The tumor must be invasive adenocarcinoma on histologic examination.
* The tumor must be determined to be HER2-positive prior to randomization. Assays performed using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) require gene amplification to be eligible. Assays using immunohistochemistry (IHC) must be performed at an NSABP-approved reference laboratory and require a strongly positive staining score.
* Patients must have an analysis of both estrogen and progesterone receptors performed on the primary tumor prior to randomization. "Marginal," "borderline," etc., results (i.e., those not definitely negative) will also be considered positive regardless of the methodology used.
* At the time of randomization, the patient must have had the following: history and physical exam, EKG, and PA and lateral chest x-ray within the past 3 months; and a bilateral mammogram (or unilateral if patient has had a mastectomy) and a pelvic exam (for women who have a uterus and who will be taking tamoxifen) within the past year.
* Within 3 months prior to entry, the patient must have a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by MUGA scan equal to or greater than the lower limit of normal for the radiology facility. (If LVEF is \> 75%, the investigator should consider having the LVEF determination reviewed prior to randomization. Following randomization, the LVEF determination may be reviewed up until the time of the post-AC MUGA. Please note that if a more accurate value is obtained from the review of the baseline MUGA, the corrected value must be submitted to the NSABP Biostatistical Center before the post-AC MUGA is performed.)
* At the time of randomization:

* The postoperative absolute neutrophil count (ANC) must be ≥ 1500/mm3 (or \<1500/mm3 if, in the opinion of the investigator, this represents an ethnic or racial variation of normal).
* Postoperative platelet count must be ≥ 100,000/mm3. Significant underlying hematologic disorders must be excluded when the platelet count is above the upper limit of normal for the lab.
* There must be postoperative evidence of adequate hepatic function, i.e., total bilirubin must be ≤ ULN for the lab unless the patient has a chronic grade 1 bilirubin elevation (\>ULN to ≤1.5 x ULN) due to Gilbert's disease or similar syndrome; and alkaline phosphatase must be \<2.5 times the ULN for the lab; and the serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT \[AST\]) must be \<1.5 times the ULN for the lab.
* There must be postoperative evidence of adequate renal function (serum creatinine within or less than the institution's normal range).
* Patients must have no clinical or radiologic evidence of metastatic disease. Suspicious findings must be confirmed as benign by radiologic evaluation or biopsy. A patient with skeletal pain is eligible for inclusion in the study if bone scan and/or roentgenological examination fails to disclose metastatic disease.
* Patients with a history of non-breast malignancies are eligible if they have been disease-free for 5 or more years prior to randomization and are deemed by their physician to be at low risk for recurrence. Patients with the following cancers are eligible if diagnosed and treated within the past 5 years: carcinoma in situ of the cervix, melanoma in situ, and basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Prior to randomization, the investigator must designate whether the patients who had a lumpectomy will receive local or locoregional radiation therapy. For patients who had a mastectomy, the investigator must designate whether or not the patient will receive radiation therapy. (Pre-randomization discussion and/or consultation with a radiation oncologist is encouraged.) Note: Irradiation of any internal mammary nodes is prohibited in this trial.
* Special conditions for eligibility of lumpectomy patients: irradiation and surgery
* Patients treated by lumpectomy and axillary node dissection to be followed by breast radiation therapy must meet all the eligibility criteria in addition to the following: Generally, lumpectomy should be reserved for tumors \<5 cm. However, at the investigator's discretion, patients treated with lumpectomy for tumors ≥ 5 cm are eligible. The margins of the resected specimen must be histologically free of invasive tumor and DCIS as determined by the local pathologist. In patients in whom pathologic examination demonstrates tumor present at the line of resection, additional operative procedures may be performed to obtain clear margins. This is permissible even if axillary dissection has been performed. Patients in whom tumor is still present at the resected margin after re-excision(s) must undergo total mastectomy to be eligible. Whole breast irradiation is required. Irradiation of regional lymph nodes is optional, but partial breast irradiation and irradiation of any internal mammary nodes are prohibited in this trial. Intent to irradiate the axilla or other regional node groups must be declared by the investigator prior to randomization for stratification purposes.
* Special conditions for eligibility of mastectomy patients: irradiation. The decision to use locoregional irradiation in patients who have undergone total mastectomy and axillary node dissection must be declared by the investigator prior to randomization for stratification purposes. Failure to adhere to the radiation therapy plan will be a protocol violation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Bilateral malignancy or a mass or mammographic abnormality in the opposite breast suspicious for malignancy unless there is biopsy proof that the mass is not malignant.
* Primary tumor staged as T4 for any reason.
* Nodes staged as clinical N2 or N3 for any reason and nodes staged as pathologic pN2b, pN3b, or pN3c.
* Prior history of breast cancer, including DCIS (patients with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ \[LCIS\] are eligible).
* Treatment including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, biotherapy, and/or hormonal therapy administered for the currently diagnosed breast cancer prior to randomization. The only exception is hormonal therapy, which may have been given for up to a total of 28 days anytime after diagnosis and before randomization. In such a case, hormonal therapy must stop at or before randomization and be re-started if indicated following chemotherapy.
* Prior anthracycline or taxane therapy for any malignancy.
* Any sex hormonal therapy, e.g., birth control pills, ovarian hormonal replacement therapy, etc. (These patients are eligible only if this therapy is discontinued prior to randomization.)
* Therapy with any hormonal agents such as raloxifene (Evista®), tamoxifen, or other selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), either for osteoporosis or prevention. (Patients are eligible only if these medications are discontinued prior to randomization. These medications are not permitted while on the study except for the use of tamoxifen as described in the protocol)
* Nonmalignant systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.) that would preclude a patient from being subjected to any of the treatment options or would prevent prolonged follow-up.
* Cardiac disease that would preclude the use of Adriamycin, Taxol or Herceptin. This includes:
* Active cardiac disease:

* angina pectoris that requires the use of antianginal medication;
* cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication;
* severe conduction abnormality;
* clinically significant valvular disease;
* cardiomegaly on chest x-ray;
* ventricular hypertrophy on EKG; or
* patients with poorly controlled hypertension, i.e., diastolic greater than 100 mm/Hg. (Patients with hypertension who are well controlled on medication are eligible for entry.)
* History of cardiac disease:

* myocardial infarction documented as a clinical diagnosis or by EKG or any other tests;
* documented congestive heart failure; or
* documented cardiomyopathy.
* Psychiatric or addictive disorders that would preclude obtaining informed consent.
* Pregnancy or lactation at the time of proposed randomization. This protocol excludes pregnant or lactating women based on the fetal toxicity of both tamoxifen and Taxol which are listed as Pregnancy Category D agents. Pregnant women who received tamoxifen have experienced fetal deaths, birth defects, spontaneous abortions, and vaginal bleeding. Women of reproductive potential must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception. Hormonal birth control methods are not permitted.
* Sensory/motor neuropathy ≥ grade 2, as defined by the NCI's Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0.
* Contraindications to corticosteroid use which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in this study.
* Concurrent treatment with other investigational agents.
* Sensitivity to benzyl alcohol.
* Special conditions for ineligibility of lumpectomy patients: irradiation and surgery. For patients treated by lumpectomy with axillary dissection, breast irradiation is required. Please see guidelines for radiation therapy in Appendix A. In addition, the following patients will also be ineligible:

* Patients with diffuse tumors (as demonstrated on mammography) that would not be considered surgically amenable to lumpectomy.
* Patients treated with lumpectomy in whom there is another clinically dominant mass or mammographically suspicious abnormality within the ipsilateral breast remnant. Such a mass must be biopsied and demonstrated to be histologically benign prior to randomization or, if malignant, must be surgically removed with clear margins.
* Patients in whom the margins of the resected specimen are involved with invasive tumor or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Additional surgical resections to obtain free margins are allowed. Patients in whom tumor is still present after the additional resection(s) must undergo mastectomy to be eligible.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

NSABP Foundation Inc

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Norman Wolmark, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NSABP Foundation Inc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Comprehensive Cancer Institute

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Providence Alaska Medical Center

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Western Regional, Arizona

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Sutter Health Western Division Cancer Research Group

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Scripps Cancer Center at Scripps Clinic

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda University Cancer Institute at Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Pacific Shores Medical Group Comprehensive Hematology-Oncology Services - Long Beach

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Bay Area Tumor Institute

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California Irvine Medical Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Center at Desert Regional Medical Center

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Sutter Cancer Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center/Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Vallejo

Vallejo, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Cancer Center at University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Incorporated

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Carole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Connecticut Health Center

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Helen and Harry Gray Cancer Center at Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Hospital

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Halifax Medical Center

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Mount Sinai Medical Center

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center - Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cancer Research Network, Inc.

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Cancer Specialists

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Phoebe Cancer Center at Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital

Albany, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Atlanta Regional

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP-Medical College of Georgia Cancer Center

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center

Fort Gordon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Cancer Research Center of Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

North Idaho Cancer Center

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush Cancer Institute at Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Central Illinois

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Evanston

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

West Suburban Hospital Medical Center

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Community Hospital

Munster, Indiana, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Northern Indiana CR Consortium

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Genesis Regional Cancer Center at Genesis Medical Center

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Norton Cancer Center at Norton Hospital

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Consultants in Blood Disorders and Cancer

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center at Louisiana State University Medical Center - New Orleans

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Tulane Cancer Center at Tulane University Hospital and Clinic

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Ochsner

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

CancerCare of Maine at Eastern Maine Medial Center

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Cancer Institute at Franklin Square Hospital Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

National Naval Medical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Cancer Research Center at Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Berkshire Medical Center

Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Baystate Regional Cancer Program at D'Amour Center for Cancer Care

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

UMASS Memorial Cancer Center - University Campus

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Josephine Ford Cancer Center at Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Michigan State University

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Kalamazoo

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Providence Cancer Institute at Providence Hospital - Southfield Campus

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Duluth

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hennepin County Medical Center - Minneapolis

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Metro-Minnesota

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Ellis Fischel Cancer Center at University of Missouri - Columbia

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Cancer Research for the Ozarks

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis University Cancer Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missouri Baptist Cancer Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - St. Louis-Cape Girardeau

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital Cancer Center at Nebraska Methodist Hospital - Omaha

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Southern Nevada Cancer Research Foundation

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Northern New Jersey

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New York Oncology Hematology, P.C. at Albany Regional Cancer Care

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Charles R. Wood Cancer Center at Glens Falls Hospital

Glens Falls, New York, United States

Site Status

Nalitt Cancer Institute at Staten Island University Hospital

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Syracuse Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York, P.C.

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP-Our Lady of Mercy Cancer Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Alamance Cancer Center

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Leo W. Jenkins Cancer Center at Pitt County Memorial Hospital

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Merit Care Hospital

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Akron City Hospital at Summa Health System

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Aultman Hospital Cancer Center at Aultman Health Foundation

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center at Jewish Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ireland Cancer Center at University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

South Pointe Hospital Cancer Care Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbus

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Dayton

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cancer Care Center at Northside Medical Center

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Oklahoma

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

John and Dorothy Morgan Cancer Center at Lehigh Valley Hospital

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hillman Cancer Center at University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mercy Hospital Cancer Center - Scranton

Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

York Cancer Center at Wellspan Health

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Kent County Memorial Hospital

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Greenville

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Upstate Carolina

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Medical City Dallas Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Scott and White Hospital

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Utah Valley Regional Medical Center - Provo

Provo, Utah, United States

Site Status

Vermont Cancer Center at University of Vermont

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Sentara Cancer Institute at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - Massey Cancer Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Virginia Mason Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Puget Sound Oncology Consortium

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Northwest

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

David Lee Cancer Center at Charleston Area Medical Center

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Camden-Clark Memorial Hospital

Parkersburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent Hospital

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Oncology Alliance, S.C. - Milwaukee

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Carlo Fidani Peel Regional Cancer Centre at Credit Valley Hospital

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital - Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Jewish General Hospital - Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

St. Mary's Hospital Center

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital du Saint-Sacrement, Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, Suman VJ, Geyer CE Jr, Davidson NE, Tan-Chiu E, Martino S, Paik S, Kaufman PA, Swain SM, Pisansky TM, Fehrenbacher L, Kutteh LA, Vogel VG, Visscher DW, Yothers G, Jenkins RB, Brown AM, Dakhil SR, Mamounas EP, Lingle WL, Klein PM, Ingle JN, Wolmark N. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1673-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052122.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16236738 (View on PubMed)

Jahanzeb M. Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2008 Aug;8(4):324-33. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2008.n.037.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18757259 (View on PubMed)

Reinholz MM, Dueck AC, Lingle WL, et al.: The concordance between NCCTG's and NSABP's C-myc FISH assays. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-22110, 2008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Garrison LP Jr, Lubeck D, Lalla D, Paton V, Dueck A, Perez EA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting for treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007 Aug 1;110(3):489-98. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22806.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17592827 (View on PubMed)

Kurian AW, Thompson RN, Gaw AF, Arai S, Ortiz R, Garber AM. A cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant trastuzumab regimens in early HER2/neu-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 20;25(6):634-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3081.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17308268 (View on PubMed)

Liberato NL, Marchetti M, Barosi G. Cost effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 20;25(6):625-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4220.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17308267 (View on PubMed)

Perez E, Romond E, Suman V, et al.: Updated results of the combined analysis of NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 adjuvant chemotherapy with/without trastuzumab in patiens with HER2-positive breast cancer. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): 512, 6s, 2007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Telli ML, Hunt SA, Carlson RW, Guardino AE. Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity: calling into question the concept of reversibility. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 10;25(23):3525-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17687157 (View on PubMed)

Baselga J, Perez EA, Pienkowski T, Bell R. Adjuvant trastuzumab: a milestone in the treatment of HER-2-positive early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2006;11 Suppl 1:4-12. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-90001-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16971734 (View on PubMed)

Gupta AK, Mekan SF, Eckman MH: Trastuzumab for all? A decision analysis examining tradeoffs between efficacy and cardiac toxicity of adjuvant therapy in HER2 positive breast cancer. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-6022, 306s, 2006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Burstein HJ. The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1652-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058197. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16236735 (View on PubMed)

Hortobagyi GN. Trastuzumab in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1734-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058196. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16236745 (View on PubMed)

Tan-Chiu E, Piccart M. Moving forward: Herceptin in the adjuvant setting. Oncology. 2002;63 Suppl 1:57-63. doi: 10.1159/000066201.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12422056 (View on PubMed)

Costa RB, Kurra G, Greenberg L, Geyer CE. Efficacy and cardiac safety of adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimens for HER2-positive early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2010 Nov;21(11):2153-2160. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq096. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20351072 (View on PubMed)

Rastogi P, Jeong J, Geyer CE, et al.: Five year update of cardiac dysfunction on NSABP B-31, a randomized trial of sequential doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)→paclitaxel (T) vs. AC→T with trastuzumab(H). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-LBA513, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Geyer CE, Bryant JL, Romond EH, et al.: Update of cardiac dysfunction on NSABP B-31, a randomized trial of sequential doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)→paclitaxel (T) vs. AC→T with trastuzumab (H). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-581, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Kim C, Bryant J, Horne Z, et al.: Trastuzumab sensitivity of breast cancer with co-amplification of HER2 and cMYC suggests pro-apoptotic function of dysregulated cMYC in vivo. [Abstract] Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 94 (Suppl 1): A-46, 2005.

Reference Type RESULT

Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Romond E, Geyer CE Jr, Ewer M, Keefe D, Shannon RP, Swain SM, Brown A, Fehrenbacher L, Vogel VG, Seay TE, Rastogi P, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N, Bryant J. Assessment of cardiac dysfunction in a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7811-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4091.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16258083 (View on PubMed)

Geyer CE Jr, Bryant J, Romond E: Cardiac safety analysis of the first stage of NSABP B-31, a randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of adriamycin® and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by taxol® to that of AC followed by taxol® plus herceptin® in patients (Pts) with operable, node-positive (N+), HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer (HER2+BC). [Abstract] Breast Cancer Res Treat 82 (Suppl 1): A-23, S13, 2003.

Reference Type RESULT

Paik S, Bryant J, Tan-Chiu E, Romond E, Hiller W, Park K, Brown A, Yothers G, Anderson S, Smith R, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N. Real-world performance of HER2 testing--National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Jun 5;94(11):852-4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.11.852.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12048273 (View on PubMed)

Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong JH, Davidson NE, Geyer CE Jr, Martino S, Mamounas EP, Kaufman PA, Wolmark N. Four-year follow-up of trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: joint analysis of data from NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3366-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.0868. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21768458 (View on PubMed)

Chumsri S, Pai T, Ma Y, Li Z, Gil A, Moreno-Aspitia A, Colon-Otero G, Pogue-Geile KL, Rasgoti P, Paik S, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) and Late Recurrence Risk in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Aug 26;22(7):463-468. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7015.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39191270 (View on PubMed)

Chumsri S, Li Z, Serie DJ, Mashadi-Hossein A, Colon-Otero G, Song N, Pogue-Geile KL, Gavin PG, Paik S, Moreno-Aspitia A, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Incidence of Late Relapses in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Trastuzumab: Combined Analysis of NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) and NRG Oncology/NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3425-3435. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00443. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31622131 (View on PubMed)

Chumsri S, Serie DJ, Li Z, Pogue-Geile KL, Soyano-Muller AE, Mashadi-Hossein A, Warren S, Lou Y, Colon-Otero G, Knutson KL, Perez EA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Thompson EA. Effects of Age and Immune Landscape on Outcome in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) and NSABP B-31 (NRG) Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 15;25(14):4422-4430. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2206. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30808774 (View on PubMed)

Gavin PG, Song N, Kim SR, Lipchik C, Johnson NL, Bandos H, Finnigan M, Rastogi P, Fehrenbacher L, Mamounas EP, Swain SM, Wickerham DL, Geyer CE Jr, Jeong JH, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Paik S, Pogue-Geile KL. Association of Polymorphisms in FCGR2A and FCGR3A With Degree of Trastuzumab Benefit in the Adjuvant Treatment of ERBB2/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Analysis of the NSABP B-31 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;3(3):335-341. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4884.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27812689 (View on PubMed)

O'Sullivan CC, Bradbury I, Campbell C, Spielmann M, Perez EA, Joensuu H, Costantino JP, Delaloge S, Rastogi P, Zardavas D, Ballman KV, Holmes E, de Azambuja E, Piccart-Gebhart M, Zujewski JA, Gelber RD. Efficacy of Adjuvant Trastuzumab for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer and Tumors </= 2 cm: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trastuzumab Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2600-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8620. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26101239 (View on PubMed)

Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong JH, Sledge G, Geyer CE Jr, Martino S, Rastogi P, Gralow J, Swain SM, Winer EP, Colon-Otero G, Davidson NE, Mamounas E, Zujewski JA, Wolmark N. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 20;32(33):3744-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5730. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25332249 (View on PubMed)

Romond EH, Jeong JH, Rastogi P, Swain SM, Geyer CE Jr, Ewer MS, Rathi V, Fehrenbacher L, Brufsky A, Azar CA, Flynn PJ, Zapas JL, Polikoff J, Gross HM, Biggs DD, Atkins JN, Tan-Chiu E, Zheng P, Yothers G, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Seven-year follow-up assessment of cardiac function in NSABP B-31, a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP) with ACP plus trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 1;30(31):3792-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.0010. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22987084 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDR0000067269

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NSABP B-31

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.