Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
211 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1977-09-30
2001-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Integrated Supported Biopsychosocial Self-Management for Back Related Leg Pain
NCT05022121
Pain Resilience for Low Back Pain.
NCT06971809
Efficacy of a Short Multidisciplinary Education and Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP)
NCT05261828
Mind-body Treatments for Chronic Back Pain
NCT03294148
Verbalization in Patients With Non-specific Low Back Pain and Central Sensitization
NCT01705600
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this randomized, controlled trial, we will randomize eligible patients with ALBP to receive the intervention or usual care. The intervention program consists of: (1) patient education regarding ALBP; (2) explanations and rationales, in layperson's terms, of diagnostic and treatment options for ALBP; (3) discussions regarding the management of negative affect (i.e., depression, anger, fear, hostility, anxiety); (4) methods to involve social support systems; and (5) strategies to involve the primary care physician to reinforce patients' behaviors and progress. We will follow patients for 12 months and assess outcomes at 3 and 12 months.
Primary outcomes are health-related quality of life (i.e., functional status, role function, back pain symptoms) and patient satisfaction with care. Secondary outcomes include health care use, direct health care costs, self-efficacy, and social support. We will also estimate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
We will conduct this investigation among socioeconomically vulnerable patients with ALBP, a group that shoulders a disproportionate burden of disability and morbidity from musculoskeletal conditions and comorbid medical conditions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Psychosocial intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Disability claim for back pain
* Nursing home resident
* Severe impairment in hearing, vision, or speech
* Unable to speak English
* Severe comorbidity
* Unable to contact by phone
* Excluded by primary care physician
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
NIH
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Morris Weinberger, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Damush TM, Weinberger M, Clark DO, Tierney WM, Rao JK, Perkins SM, Verel K. Acute low back pain self-management intervention for urban primary care patients: rationale, design, and predictors of participation. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;47(4):372-9. doi: 10.1002/art.10382.
Damush TM, Weinberger M, Perkins SM, Rao JK, Tierney WM, Qi R, Clark DO. Randomized trial of a self-management program for primary care patients with acute low back pain: short-term effects. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):179-86. doi: 10.1002/art.10995.
Damush, Weinberger, Perkins, Rao, Tierney, Qi, & Clark. The cost-effectiveness of a self-management program for primary care patients with acute low back pain. 2002. In preparation.
Damush TM, Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Rao JK, Clark DO, & Perkins SM. A randomized trial of a self-management program for primary care patients with acute low back pain: 12-month outcomes. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2001;44:S206.
Damush TM, Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Rao JK, Clark DO, & Perkins SM. A randomized trial of a self-management program for primary care patients with acute low back pain: 4-month outcomes. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, Philadelphia, PA. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2000;43:S9.
Damush TM, Weinberger M, Tierney WM, Rao J, Clark DO, Adams K, Perkins S, & Emsley C. A comparison between older and younger adults with acute low back pain on functional status and self-management. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco, CA. The Gerontologist. 1999;39:S571.
Damush TM, Weinberger M, Perkins SM, Rao JK, Tierney WM, Qi R, Clark DO. The long-term effects of a self-management program for inner-city primary care patients with acute low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 24;163(21):2632-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.21.2632.
Gameza VA, Bell Lybecker M, Wara P. Laparoscopic Keyhole Versus Sugarbaker Repair in Parastomal Hernia: A Long-Term Case-Controlled Prospective Study of Consecutive Patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):783-789. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0074. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIAMS-025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P60 AR20582 Substudy EEHSR4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.