Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of ICU Delirium
NCT ID: NCT07348471
Last Updated: 2026-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-02-01
2028-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Emerging evidence suggests that ICU-acquired gut microbiota dysbiosis plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of delirium. Dysbiosis can compromise intestinal barrier integrity, promoting systemic inflammation and increasing susceptibility to various forms of delirium, including acute illness-related and postoperative types. These effects are likely mediated through the "gut-microbiota-brain axis," which may represent a central mechanism underlying neurocognitive dysfunction in critical illness.
Preclinical studies have demonstrated that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can restore microbial balance and exert beneficial effects on neurological function. FMT has shown promise in ameliorating cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer's disease, chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, traumatic brain injury, and chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS). Clinically, FMT has been associated with cognitive improvement in patients with dementia, recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, and sepsis-associated encephalopathy. With expanding applications in both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal disorders, FMT has emerged as a transformative therapeutic modality, supported by robust short- and long-term safety and efficacy data.
This study aims to evaluate whether FMT can alleviate delirium severity, correct gut microbiota dysbiosis at 0, 72, and 120 hours post-enrollment, attenuate intestinal barrier dysfunction, reduce systemic inflammation and disease severity, shorten ICU length of stay, and lower rates of ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, and 28-day all-cause mortality-ultimately positioning FMT as a potential breakthrough intervention for ICU delirium.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Trajectory and Influencing Factors of Cognitive Level in ICU Delirium Patients After Transfer Out of the ICU
NCT06674603
The Gut Microbiota and Delirium in the ICU
NCT03328377
PupillOmetry for Prediction of DelirIUM
NCT05248035
Prevention of Delirium in ICU Using Multimodal Interventions
NCT05950958
A Multidisciplinary Delirium Prevention Strategy Involving Psychiatry in the ICU
NCT03550495
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
The control group received standard ICU care, which includes monitoring vital signs, managing underlying conditions, infection treatment, nutritional support, and sedation or analgesia as per established clinical guidelines. These patients did not receive fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Treatment decisions were made by the attending physician according to standard ICU protocols and routine clinical practice.
No interventions assigned to this group
FMT intervention Group
FMT was administered via nasojejunal tube in addition to standard ICU care. A volume of 50-100 mL of intestinal microbiota suspension was delivered daily through the nasojejunal tube over a three-day period, between 11:00 and 13:00 each day.
Intestinal microbiota suspension
FMT was administered via a nasojejunal tube daily for three consecutive days, between 11:00 and 13:00. Each 50-100 mL dose, derived from 100-150 g of adolescent donor feces diluted to 300 mL. Patients fasted for 2 hours before and after FMT, except for permitted water intake. Intravenous antibiotics were withheld unless active infection was confirmed. If pathogens were considered colonizing and the patient remained stable, systemic antibiotics were avoided. Localized treatments, such as nebulized antibiotics, were allowed as needed. All antibiotic use required clinical justification and individual assessment to minimize interference with FMT. Oral antibiotics were prohibited after FMT initiation to protect engraftment and microbial integrity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intestinal microbiota suspension
FMT was administered via a nasojejunal tube daily for three consecutive days, between 11:00 and 13:00. Each 50-100 mL dose, derived from 100-150 g of adolescent donor feces diluted to 300 mL. Patients fasted for 2 hours before and after FMT, except for permitted water intake. Intravenous antibiotics were withheld unless active infection was confirmed. If pathogens were considered colonizing and the patient remained stable, systemic antibiotics were avoided. Localized treatments, such as nebulized antibiotics, were allowed as needed. All antibiotic use required clinical justification and individual assessment to minimize interference with FMT. Oral antibiotics were prohibited after FMT initiation to protect engraftment and microbial integrity.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2\. CAM-ICU-positive delirium;
* 3\. Expected ICU stay ≥ 5 days after inclusion in the study;
* 4\. Signed written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Typical antipsychotics: Chlorprothixene, Flupentixol, Haloperidol, Levomepromazine, Loxapine, Melperone, Perphenazine, Pericyazine, Pimozide, Prochlorperazine, Zuclopenthixol, Pimavanserin, Sulpiride.
2. Atypical antipsychotics: Amisulpride, Aripiprazole, Asenapine, Clozapine, Lurasidone, Olanzapine, Paliperidone, Quetiapine, Risperidone, Sertindole, Ziprasidone. However, the non-habitual administration of antipsychotic medications in the general ward prior to the patient's ICU admission (e.g., for the management of delirium) is deemed acceptable. Nevertheless, antipsychotic therapy should be discontinued upon the patient's ICU admission.
* 2\. Severe systemic infection in the early stage of resuscitation, hemodynamic instability or insufficient tissue perfusion, and severe imbalance of water, electrolyte and acid-base.
* 3\. Patients with a high risk of death within 5 days as judged by the clinician, or those whose treatment decisions are restricted.
* 4\. Active major gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or other severe damage to the intestinal barrier.
* 5\. Patients who cannot tolerate 50% of their caloric requirements through enteral nutrition due to severe diarrhea, significant fibrotic intestinal stenosis, severe gastrointestinal bleeding, or high-flow enteric fistula.
* 6\. Planned or recent abdominal surgery (within 14 days).
* 7\. Currently diagnosed with fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon.
* 8\. Recently received high-risk immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drug treatment: such as rituximab, doxorubicin, or medium to high-dose corticosteroids (20 mg/d prednisone or higher) for more than 4 weeks.
* 9\. Pregnant or lactating women.
* 10\. Participated in other clinical trials as a subject within the past 3 months or at the time of enrollment.
* 11\. Delirium assessment non applicable: this includes language barriers (patients with foreign language where delirium assessment cannot be confidently performed by the site staff), patients who are deaf, blind or aphasic. Comatose patients are not applicable for delirium assessment. Coma is defined by the following levels of consciousness: RASS -4 to -5. Further, RASS -3 may be considered as coma if this is the judgement of the treating physician. If a patient's coma is considered related to administration of sedative agents, an effort should be made to reduce or terminate the sedative treatment, according to the clinician's discretion.
* 12\. Doubtful validity of informed consent: subjects with mental illness, intellectual disability, poor motivation, or other factors that limit the validity of informed consent for participation in this study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jiancheng Zhang
Prof. Jiancheng Zhang
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
zjc202507
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.