BIS-Guided Propofol vs Remifentanil for Gastroscopy: Effects on Procedure Start Time and Recovery

NCT ID: NCT07336628

Last Updated: 2026-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-24

Study Completion Date

2026-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares two different sedation methods used during gastroscopy (a procedure to examine the upper digestive tract with a camera). Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either propofol-based sedation or remifentanil-based sedation, both combined with a standard premedication drug called midazolam.

During the procedure, the depth of sedation will be monitored using a device called a Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor, which measures brain activity to ensure patients receive the right amount of sedation-not too little and not too much. The sedation will be adjusted to keep patients comfortable but able to respond to simple commands.

The main goal of this study is to compare how quickly patients wake up after the procedure ends with each sedation method. The researchers will also measure:

* How quickly the procedure can begin after sedation starts
* How much sedation medication is needed
* How long the gastroscopy takes
* When patients are ready to go home
* Whether the BIS monitor readings match with clinical assessments of sedation
* Side effects such as low blood pressure, slow heart rate, or nausea
* How satisfied the endoscopist (the doctor performing the gastroscopy) is with the sedation quality

This research will help doctors understand which sedation approach provides better procedural efficiency, faster recovery, and fewer side effects for patients undergoing gastroscopy. Both propofol and remifentanil are already widely used and approved medications for sedation, and both will be given according to standard medical practice under careful monitoring.

Participants will be adults scheduled for routine diagnostic gastroscopy at Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital. The study will enroll 80 patients total, with 40 patients in each sedation group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

Gastrointestinal endoscopy is one of the most commonly performed diagnostic procedures worldwide. Procedural sedation has become standard practice to enhance patient comfort, improve procedural quality, and increase patient willingness to undergo necessary endoscopic examinations.

Propofol is widely used for gastrointestinal endoscopy due to its rapid onset, predictable pharmacokinetics, and favorable recovery profile. However, propofol lacks intrinsic analgesic properties and may cause dose-dependent cardiovascular and respiratory depression, particularly when used as a sole agent.

Remifentanil is an ultra-short-acting opioid analgesic with context-insensitive pharmacokinetics, providing potent analgesia with rapid metabolism via plasma esterases. When combined with sedative agents, remifentanil may reduce hypnotic requirements and improve tolerance to endoscopic manipulation.

The Bispectral Index (BIS) is an electroencephalography-derived parameter that provides objective assessment of sedation depth. BIS values between 60 and 80 are conventionally targeted for moderate sedation. However, the clinical utility of BIS monitoring in gastrointestinal endoscopy and its correlation with clinical sedation scales remains incompletely characterized.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Primary Objective:

To compare awakening time between propofol-based and remifentanil-based sedation regimens in patients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy under BIS guidance.

Secondary Objectives:

1. To evaluate procedure start time (interval from sedation initiation to successful gastroscope insertion)
2. To assess total sedative consumption and procedure duration
3. To measure recovery characteristics and discharge time
4. To determine the correlation between BIS values and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores
5. To compare the incidence and severity of adverse events between groups
6. To evaluate endoscopist satisfaction with procedural conditions

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either propofol-based or remifentanil-based sedation following midazolam premedication. Block randomization with variable block sizes will be used to ensure balanced allocation. Allocation concealment will be maintained using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.

Patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. The anesthesiologist administering sedation will necessarily be unblinded to allow appropriate drug titration but will not participate in outcome assessment.

INTERVENTION DETAILS

All patients will receive:

* Standard monitoring: ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, BIS monitoring
* Supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula at 6 L/min
* Midazolam 2 mg intravenously as premedication

Group P (Propofol group):

Continuous propofol infusion at 100-150 µg/kg/min, titrated to maintain BIS 60-80 and Ramsay Sedation Scale 2-3.

Group R (Remifentanil group):

Remifentanil loading dose 1 µg/kg followed by continuous infusion at 0.025-0.1 µg/kg/min, titrated to maintain BIS 60-80 and Ramsay Sedation Scale 2-3.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Primary Outcome:

Awakening time, defined as time from cessation of sedative infusion to spontaneous eye opening in response to verbal command.

Key Secondary Outcomes:

* Procedure start time: Interval from sedation initiation to successful gastroscope insertion without patient movement or discomfort
* Total sedative drug consumption (mg for propofol, µg for remifentanil)
* Procedure duration (gastroscope insertion to withdrawal)
* Discharge time (Modified Aldrete Score ≥9)
* BIS-Ramsay correlation coefficient (Spearman's ρ)
* Adverse events: hypotension, bradycardia, desaturation, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting
* Endoscopist satisfaction (5-point Likert scale)

Hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation), BIS values, and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores will be recorded at baseline and every 5 minutes throughout the procedure.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Sample size calculation is based on the primary outcome (awakening time). Assuming mean awakening times of 5.0±2.0 minutes (propofol) versus 7.0±2.5 minutes (remifentanil), with α=0.05 and power=80%, a total of 80 patients (40 per group) will be required, accounting for 10% dropout.

Continuous variables will be compared using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Categorical variables will be compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Repeated measures will be analyzed using ANOVA or GEE. BIS-Ramsay correlation will be evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation. Statistical significance is defined as p\<0.05 (two-sided).

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS

Both propofol and remifentanil are approved medications widely used for procedural sedation. All procedures will be performed by experienced personnel in a fully equipped endoscopy unit with immediate access to resuscitation equipment and medications. Adverse events will be managed according to standard clinical protocols and reported to the institutional ethics committee as required.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Conscious Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-arm parallel design with 1:1 randomization. No crossover.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants are sedated during the procedure and unaware of group assignment. Outcomes assessors (recovery room nurses, independent observers assessing Ramsay scores) are blinded to group allocation. The anesthesiologist administering sedation is necessarily unblinded to allow appropriate drug titration but does not participate in outcome assessment. Endoscopists are blinded to group allocation and BIS values.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol Group

Patients receive midazolam 2 mg IV premedication followed by continuous propofol infusion (100-150 µg/kg/min) titrated to maintain BIS 60-80.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol (Astra-Zeneca)

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous intravenous infusion of propofol at 100-150 µg/kg/min, titrated to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values between 60 and 80 and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores of 2-3. Infusion is initiated after endoscopy team confirms readiness and continued until procedure completion. Administered only to participants in the Propofol Group.

Remifentanil Group

Patients receive midazolam 2 mg IV premedication followed by remifentanil loading dose (1 µg/kg) and continuous infusion (0.025-0.1 µg/kg/min) titrated to maintain BIS 60-80.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous loading dose of remifentanil 1 µg/kg administered over 60 seconds, followed by continuous infusion at 0.025-0.1 µg/kg/min. Infusion rate is titrated to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values between 60 and 80 and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores of 2-3. Infusion is initiated after endoscopy team confirms readiness and continued until procedure completion. Administered only to participants in the Remifentanil Group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol (Astra-Zeneca)

Continuous intravenous infusion of propofol at 100-150 µg/kg/min, titrated to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values between 60 and 80 and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores of 2-3. Infusion is initiated after endoscopy team confirms readiness and continued until procedure completion. Administered only to participants in the Propofol Group.

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil

Intravenous loading dose of remifentanil 1 µg/kg administered over 60 seconds, followed by continuous infusion at 0.025-0.1 µg/kg/min. Infusion rate is titrated to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values between 60 and 80 and Ramsay Sedation Scale scores of 2-3. Infusion is initiated after endoscopy team confirms readiness and continued until procedure completion. Administered only to participants in the Remifentanil Group.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Propofol Injectable Emulsion Ultiva

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years
* ASA physical status I-III
* Scheduled for elective diagnostic gastroscopy
* Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA IV-V
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Known allergy to propofol, remifentanil, or midazolam
* Severe cardiopulmonary disease (NYHA III-IV, unstable angina, severe COPD requiring home oxygen)
* Chronic opioid use (\>3 months daily use)
* BMI \>40 kg/m²
* Obstructive sleep apnea requiring CPAP
* Severe hepatic or renal impairment
* Inability to provide informed consent
* Emergency procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cansu Ofluoğlu

Specialist in Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

cansu ofluoglu, md

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

doga meric yukselen, md

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

cansu Ofluoglu, Anesthesiologist, MD

Role: CONTACT

+905358640564

doga meric yukselen, Anesthesiologist, MD

Role: CONTACT

+905362963155

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FSMTRHSEDO

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.