Machine Learning to Predict Postoperative Pneumonia in Brain Tumor Patients

NCT ID: NCT07321262

Last Updated: 2026-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1856 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common and serious complication after elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection. POP often develops within the first week after surgery and may lead to prolonged hospitalization, higher medical costs, and increased risk of severe illness. Because symptoms can be subtle in neurosurgical patients, POP may be detected late, limiting timely prevention and treatment.

This study will evaluate whether a machine-learning-based clinical decision support tool can help clinicians identify patients at high risk for POP early and improve perioperative preventive care. The tool uses routinely collected clinical information to estimate an individual patient's POP risk and provides an easy-to-understand explanation of key risk drivers. Based on the predicted risk level (low, moderate, high, or very high), the system suggests standardized preventive care pathways (e.g., perioperative airway management, targeted antibiotic strategies per local practice, and nutritional support), while allowing clinicians to override recommendations at any time.

Participants will be adults undergoing their first elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection at participating neurosurgical centers. The primary outcome is the occurrence of POP within 7 days after surgery, defined using CDC/NHSN criteria. Secondary outcomes include antibiotic use intensity, length of hospital stay, direct medical cost, and clinician decision confidence. Participants will be followed at postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 using electronic medical record review and phone confirmation when needed.

The goal of this study is to determine whether integrating an explainable AI risk prediction tool into routine care can reduce POP and improve the quality and efficiency of perioperative management after brain tumor surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale Postoperative pneumonia (POP) remains a frequent and clinically important complication after elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection, contributing to prolonged hospitalization, increased cost, and worse clinical outcomes. Conventional POP risk assessment is often experience-based or relies on simplified scoring approaches, which may not adequately capture nonlinear interactions among perioperative factors. This study implements an explainable machine-learning (ML) prediction model within routine perioperative workflows and evaluates whether model-assisted care can improve POP prevention and related resource utilization compared with usual care.

Decision support system

An explainable gradient boosting machine (GBM) model is used to estimate individual POP risk from routinely available perioperative variables. Interpretability is provided using SHAP-based explanations at two complementary levels:

Population level: summarizes the most influential predictors and selected interaction patterns to support clinical understanding and model governance.

Patient level: generates an individualized contribution visualization (e.g., waterfall-style), highlighting the main drivers of a specific patient's risk estimate.

The system automatically assigns a risk tier (low, moderate, high, or very high) and links each tier to standardized prevention pathway templates (e.g., airway management optimization, antimicrobial stewardship-consistent strategies per local policy, and nutritional support). The tool does not mandate treatment; clinicians may accept, modify, or override any suggestion.

Evaluation framework The overall project includes retrospective model development/optimization, prospective external validation/calibration, and a pragmatic implementation evaluation. The registered interventional evaluation uses a multicenter, cluster randomized crossover design with monthly alternating periods of model-assisted care versus usual care. Allocation procedures, eligibility criteria, planned enrollment, and endpoint definitions/time windows are specified in the corresponding record modules (Study Design, Arms/Interventions, Outcome Measures, and Eligibility) to avoid duplication in this section.

Implementation and integration The model is deployed as a lightweight web service with unified APIs and data-exchange formats to enable non-disruptive integration with hospital information systems (HIS) and electronic medical records (EMR). A web-based front end and a Python-based back end support RESTful calls and are designed for low-latency inference (target single-prediction latency \<200 ms), suitable for perioperative and inpatient workflows.

Data governance and model updating To support long-term generalizability across hospitals and mitigate dataset shift, the project establishes a closed-loop maintenance process ("local de-identification → cloud retraining → model version management → edge deployment"). Model updates are version-controlled and deployed under governance procedures consistent with local regulations, institutional policies, and applicable ethics approvals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pneumonia Brain Tumors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Retrospective model development cohort (CAMS/PUMC, 2022-2024)

Retrospective cohort collected at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS/PUMC) between Jan 1, 2022 and Oct 31, 2024. Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for intracranial brain tumor resection were included. This cohort was used for model development, comparison of candidate algorithms, and internal validation; it was randomly split 8:2 into a training set (n=609) and an internal validation set (n=152). Early postoperative pneumonia (POP) was defined by CDC criteria within 7 days postoperatively. No study-mandated intervention was applied; routine perioperative care was provided.

No interventions assigned to this group

Prospective internal validation cohort (Test P, CAMS/PUMC)

Prospective cohort enrolled at CAMS/PUMC between Nov 1, 2024 and Apr 30, 2025 (Test P; n=224). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection were included. This cohort prospectively validated the finalized interpretable prediction model for early POP using routinely available perioperative EMR variables. Early POP was defined per CDC criteria within 7 postoperative days. Clinical management followed standard-of-care without any study-assigned intervention.

No interventions assigned to this group

Prospective external validation cohort (Test A, Anhui Medical Univ)

Prospective external validation cohort recruited at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from Aug 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 (Test A; n=329). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection were included. The cohort independently validated the finalized POP prediction model using routine perioperative data. Early POP was defined by CDC criteria within 7 days after surgery. No investigational intervention was administered; all care followed local standard practice.

No interventions assigned to this group

Prospective external validation cohort (Test S, Shandong Cancer Hospital)

Prospective external validation cohort recruited at Shandong Cancer Hospital from Aug 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 (Test S; n=440). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for intracranial brain tumor resection were included. This cohort was used to externally validate the finalized interpretable model for early POP prediction using routinely collected perioperative variables. Early POP was defined according to CDC criteria within 7 postoperative days. Participants received routine perioperative management per institutional standards without study-mandated interventions.

No interventions assigned to this group

Prospective external validation cohort (Test J, Jinan Fourth People's Hospital)

Prospective external validation cohort recruited at Jinan Fourth People's Hospital from Aug 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 (Test J; n=102). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection were included. The cohort externally validated the finalized prediction model for early POP based on routine perioperative EMR data. Early POP was defined per CDC criteria within 7 postoperative days. There was no study-assigned intervention; all patients received standard perioperative care per local protocols.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years.
* Undergoing elective craniotomy for intracranial brain tumor resection.
* Perioperative clinical data available in the electronic medical record to derive required predictors.
* Expected postoperative survival ≥ 7 days.

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of active infection (including pneumonia) prior to surgery.
* Thoracic surgery or severe chest trauma within 30 days prior to craniotomy.
* Spinal tumors or extracranial peripheral nerve tumors.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Hospice care, expected survival \< 7 days, or insufficient data completeness for model calculation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ming Yang

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Yang

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017;30

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Azodi CB, Tang J, Shiu SH. Opening the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning for Geneticists. Trends Genet. 2020 Jun;36(6):442-455. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32396837 (View on PubMed)

Han J, Yao T, Gao L, Gao H, Chen Y, Wang Y, Cao Y, Liu C, Qiu F, Jia K, Huang H. Development and validation of a risk prediction model related to inflammatory and nutritional indexes for postoperative pulmonary infection after radical colorectal cancer surgery. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e087426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087426.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39779267 (View on PubMed)

Zhao C, Xiang B, Zhang J, Yang P, Liu Q, Wang S. Predicting postoperative pulmonary infection risk in patients with diabetes using machine learning. Front Physiol. 2024 Dec 4;15:1501854. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1501854. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39697615 (View on PubMed)

Chen Y, Ma M, Qu D, Xu C. Machine learning and transformer models for prediction of postoperative pneumonia risk in patients with lower limb fractures. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04623-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40595785 (View on PubMed)

Churpek MM, Carey KA, Edelson DP, Singh T, Astor BC, Gilbert ER, Winslow C, Shah N, Afshar M, Koyner JL. Internal and External Validation of a Machine Learning Risk Score for Acute Kidney Injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012892. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12892.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32780123 (View on PubMed)

Koyner JL, Adhikari R, Edelson DP, Churpek MM. Development of a Multicenter Ward-Based AKI Prediction Model. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):1935-1943. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00280116. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27633727 (View on PubMed)

Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21045639 (View on PubMed)

Lan J, Wei Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Mo L, Wei D, Lei Y. Risk Factors for Post-Operative Pulmonary Infection in Patients With Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Sep;24(7):588-597. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.130. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37582199 (View on PubMed)

Jing X, Wang X, Zhuang H, Fang X, Xu H. Multiple Machine Learning Approaches Based on Postoperative Prediction of Pulmonary Complications in Patients With Emergency Cerebral Hemorrhage Surgery. Front Surg. 2022 Jan 18;8:797872. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.797872. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35127804 (View on PubMed)

Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Shangari G, Chang HQ, Parsa AT, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Risk factors for the development of serious medical complications after resection of meningiomas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):697-704. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS091974. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20653395 (View on PubMed)

Longo M, Agarwal V. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Brain Tumor Resection: A National Database Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1147-e1154. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.058. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30880210 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez-Bonet LG, Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Lizan Tudela L. [Neurosurgery in the elderly patient: Geriatric neurosurgery]. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 4. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26762658 (View on PubMed)

Karhade AV, Cote DJ, Larsen AM, Smith TR. Neurosurgical Infection Rates and Risk Factors: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis of 132,000 Patients, 2006-2014. World Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;97:205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.056. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27671880 (View on PubMed)

Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18538699 (View on PubMed)

Lan J, Liu X, Mo L, Wei D, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lei Y. Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with brain tumor: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2025 Mar 31;13:e18996. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18996. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40183067 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-I2M-3-014

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCC2025C-1426

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.