Machine Learning to Predict Postoperative Pneumonia in Brain Tumor Patients
NCT ID: NCT07321262
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1856 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-08-01
2025-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will evaluate whether a machine-learning-based clinical decision support tool can help clinicians identify patients at high risk for POP early and improve perioperative preventive care. The tool uses routinely collected clinical information to estimate an individual patient's POP risk and provides an easy-to-understand explanation of key risk drivers. Based on the predicted risk level (low, moderate, high, or very high), the system suggests standardized preventive care pathways (e.g., perioperative airway management, targeted antibiotic strategies per local practice, and nutritional support), while allowing clinicians to override recommendations at any time.
Participants will be adults undergoing their first elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection at participating neurosurgical centers. The primary outcome is the occurrence of POP within 7 days after surgery, defined using CDC/NHSN criteria. Secondary outcomes include antibiotic use intensity, length of hospital stay, direct medical cost, and clinician decision confidence. Participants will be followed at postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 using electronic medical record review and phone confirmation when needed.
The goal of this study is to determine whether integrating an explainable AI risk prediction tool into routine care can reduce POP and improve the quality and efficiency of perioperative management after brain tumor surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
AI Models for Predicting Occult Pleural Dissemination in NSCLC
NCT07065422
Predicting Immunotherapy Response and Survival of Lung Cancer Patients Using Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics (Radiology-AI-Lung)
NCT07059923
Integrating Machine Learning for Prognostic Prediction in Stage I NSCLC by CT Images and Pathological Factors
NCT06737367
Multimodal Large Model-Driven Risk and Prognosis Assessment for Brain Metastases in Lung Cancer
NCT07107035
Postoperative Pulmonary Function Assessment Based on Deep Learning Study
NCT07256457
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Decision support system
An explainable gradient boosting machine (GBM) model is used to estimate individual POP risk from routinely available perioperative variables. Interpretability is provided using SHAP-based explanations at two complementary levels:
Population level: summarizes the most influential predictors and selected interaction patterns to support clinical understanding and model governance.
Patient level: generates an individualized contribution visualization (e.g., waterfall-style), highlighting the main drivers of a specific patient's risk estimate.
The system automatically assigns a risk tier (low, moderate, high, or very high) and links each tier to standardized prevention pathway templates (e.g., airway management optimization, antimicrobial stewardship-consistent strategies per local policy, and nutritional support). The tool does not mandate treatment; clinicians may accept, modify, or override any suggestion.
Evaluation framework The overall project includes retrospective model development/optimization, prospective external validation/calibration, and a pragmatic implementation evaluation. The registered interventional evaluation uses a multicenter, cluster randomized crossover design with monthly alternating periods of model-assisted care versus usual care. Allocation procedures, eligibility criteria, planned enrollment, and endpoint definitions/time windows are specified in the corresponding record modules (Study Design, Arms/Interventions, Outcome Measures, and Eligibility) to avoid duplication in this section.
Implementation and integration The model is deployed as a lightweight web service with unified APIs and data-exchange formats to enable non-disruptive integration with hospital information systems (HIS) and electronic medical records (EMR). A web-based front end and a Python-based back end support RESTful calls and are designed for low-latency inference (target single-prediction latency \<200 ms), suitable for perioperative and inpatient workflows.
Data governance and model updating To support long-term generalizability across hospitals and mitigate dataset shift, the project establishes a closed-loop maintenance process ("local de-identification → cloud retraining → model version management → edge deployment"). Model updates are version-controlled and deployed under governance procedures consistent with local regulations, institutional policies, and applicable ethics approvals.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective model development cohort (CAMS/PUMC, 2022-2024)
Retrospective cohort collected at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (CAMS/PUMC) between Jan 1, 2022 and Oct 31, 2024. Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for intracranial brain tumor resection were included. This cohort was used for model development, comparison of candidate algorithms, and internal validation; it was randomly split 8:2 into a training set (n=609) and an internal validation set (n=152). Early postoperative pneumonia (POP) was defined by CDC criteria within 7 days postoperatively. No study-mandated intervention was applied; routine perioperative care was provided.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective internal validation cohort (Test P, CAMS/PUMC)
Prospective cohort enrolled at CAMS/PUMC between Nov 1, 2024 and Apr 30, 2025 (Test P; n=224). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection were included. This cohort prospectively validated the finalized interpretable prediction model for early POP using routinely available perioperative EMR variables. Early POP was defined per CDC criteria within 7 postoperative days. Clinical management followed standard-of-care without any study-assigned intervention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective external validation cohort (Test A, Anhui Medical Univ)
Prospective external validation cohort recruited at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from Aug 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 (Test A; n=329). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection were included. The cohort independently validated the finalized POP prediction model using routine perioperative data. Early POP was defined by CDC criteria within 7 days after surgery. No investigational intervention was administered; all care followed local standard practice.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective external validation cohort (Test S, Shandong Cancer Hospital)
Prospective external validation cohort recruited at Shandong Cancer Hospital from Aug 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 (Test S; n=440). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for intracranial brain tumor resection were included. This cohort was used to externally validate the finalized interpretable model for early POP prediction using routinely collected perioperative variables. Early POP was defined according to CDC criteria within 7 postoperative days. Participants received routine perioperative management per institutional standards without study-mandated interventions.
No interventions assigned to this group
Prospective external validation cohort (Test J, Jinan Fourth People's Hospital)
Prospective external validation cohort recruited at Jinan Fourth People's Hospital from Aug 1, 2024 to Apr 30, 2025 (Test J; n=102). Adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumor resection were included. The cohort externally validated the finalized prediction model for early POP based on routine perioperative EMR data. Early POP was defined per CDC criteria within 7 postoperative days. There was no study-assigned intervention; all patients received standard perioperative care per local protocols.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing elective craniotomy for intracranial brain tumor resection.
* Perioperative clinical data available in the electronic medical record to derive required predictors.
* Expected postoperative survival ≥ 7 days.
Exclusion Criteria
* Thoracic surgery or severe chest trauma within 30 days prior to craniotomy.
* Spinal tumors or extracranial peripheral nerve tumors.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Hospice care, expected survival \< 7 days, or insufficient data completeness for model calculation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
OTHER
Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute
OTHER
Ming Yang
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ming Yang
Clinical Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017;30
Azodi CB, Tang J, Shiu SH. Opening the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning for Geneticists. Trends Genet. 2020 Jun;36(6):442-455. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
Han J, Yao T, Gao L, Gao H, Chen Y, Wang Y, Cao Y, Liu C, Qiu F, Jia K, Huang H. Development and validation of a risk prediction model related to inflammatory and nutritional indexes for postoperative pulmonary infection after radical colorectal cancer surgery. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e087426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087426.
Zhao C, Xiang B, Zhang J, Yang P, Liu Q, Wang S. Predicting postoperative pulmonary infection risk in patients with diabetes using machine learning. Front Physiol. 2024 Dec 4;15:1501854. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1501854. eCollection 2024.
Chen Y, Ma M, Qu D, Xu C. Machine learning and transformer models for prediction of postoperative pneumonia risk in patients with lower limb fractures. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04623-y.
Churpek MM, Carey KA, Edelson DP, Singh T, Astor BC, Gilbert ER, Winslow C, Shah N, Afshar M, Koyner JL. Internal and External Validation of a Machine Learning Risk Score for Acute Kidney Injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2012892. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12892.
Koyner JL, Adhikari R, Edelson DP, Churpek MM. Development of a Multicenter Ward-Based AKI Prediction Model. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):1935-1943. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00280116. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.
Lan J, Wei Y, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Mo L, Wei D, Lei Y. Risk Factors for Post-Operative Pulmonary Infection in Patients With Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Sep;24(7):588-597. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.130. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
Jing X, Wang X, Zhuang H, Fang X, Xu H. Multiple Machine Learning Approaches Based on Postoperative Prediction of Pulmonary Complications in Patients With Emergency Cerebral Hemorrhage Surgery. Front Surg. 2022 Jan 18;8:797872. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.797872. eCollection 2021.
Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Shangari G, Chang HQ, Parsa AT, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Risk factors for the development of serious medical complications after resection of meningiomas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):697-704. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS091974. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
Longo M, Agarwal V. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Brain Tumor Resection: A National Database Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1147-e1154. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.058. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
Gonzalez-Bonet LG, Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, Lizan Tudela L. [Neurosurgery in the elderly patient: Geriatric neurosurgery]. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 4. Spanish.
Karhade AV, Cote DJ, Larsen AM, Smith TR. Neurosurgical Infection Rates and Risk Factors: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis of 132,000 Patients, 2006-2014. World Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;97:205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.056. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. No abstract available.
Lan J, Liu X, Mo L, Wei D, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lei Y. Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with brain tumor: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2025 Mar 31;13:e18996. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18996. eCollection 2025.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-I2M-3-014
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCC2025C-1426
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.