Evaluation Study of Retro Discal Tissue Injection Arthroscopically Versus Ultrasound Guide Injection

NCT ID: NCT07316790

Last Updated: 2026-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-13

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A comparative evaluation study of arthroscopic retrodiscal tissue injection versus ultrasound-guided injection in temporomandibular joint disorders aims to assess differences in pain relief, functional improvement, and clinical outcomes between an invasive and a minimally invasive delivery technique. Arthroscopic injection allows direct visualization of intra-articular structures, accurate targeting of the retrodiscal tissues, and simultaneous management of associated pathology such as synovitis or adhesions, which may enhance therapeutic outcomes in advanced internal derangement. In contrast, ultrasound-guided injection offers a less invasive, cost-effective, and outpatient-based approach with improved accuracy over blind techniques, making it suitable for early or moderate cases. While both methods are effective in reducing pain and improving mouth opening and jaw function, arthroscopic injection may provide superior results in patients requiring diagnostic confirmation and mechanical intervention, whereas ultrasound-guided injection offers comparable symptomatic improvement with lower procedural morbidity and resource utilization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroscope

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arthroscopic Retrodiscal Tissue Injection

Arthroscopic Retrodiscal Tissue Injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Arthroscopic retrodiscal tissue injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic retrodiscal tissue injection

Ultrasound-Guided Retrodiscal Tissue Injection

Ultrasound-Guided Retrodiscal Tissue Injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound-guided retrodiscal tissue injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-guided retrodiscal tissue injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthroscopic retrodiscal tissue injection

Arthroscopic retrodiscal tissue injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-guided retrodiscal tissue injection

Ultrasound-guided retrodiscal tissue injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 18-60 years with symptomatic TMJ disorder/internal derangement (unilateral or bilateral)
* TMJ pain at rest and/or during function for ≥ 3 months
* Clinical diagnosis consistent with disc displacement with or without reduction (with or without MRI confirmation, if included in the protocol)
* Baseline pain intensity ≥ 4/10 on VAS or NRS
* Limitation of mouth opening or functional impairment (e.g., maximum mouth opening ≤ 35 mm or pain-related limitation)
* Failed or insufficient response to conservative therapy for ≥ 4-6 weeks (e.g., soft diet, NSAIDs, splint therapy, physiotherapy)
* Ability to provide informed consent and comply with scheduled follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous TMJ surgery (arthroscopy or arthrotomy) on the study side or TMJ injection within the last 3-6 months
* TMJ ankylosis, fracture, tumor, or active infection
* Primary inflammatory arthropathy (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout, psoriatic arthritis) or systemic connective tissue disease affecting the TMJ
* Significant degenerative joint disease (advanced osteoarthritis) if the study focuses on internal derangement or soft tissue pathology
* Severe skeletal or dentofacial deformity requiring orthognathic surgery during the study period
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Bleeding disorders, platelet disorders, or anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely managed (particularly relevant for PRP injections)
* Known allergy or contraindication to the planned injectate or local anesthetic
* Severe uncontrolled systemic disease (ASA III-IV) or inability to tolerate anesthesia or sedation (for arthroscopy arm)
* Active psychiatric or neurologic condition that may impair accurate pain reporting or follow-up compliance
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wajmah Sayed Karim Al Sayed

Principal Investigator, PhD Candidate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Niveen AL Asker, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

Niveen AL Asker, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

facility of Dentistry

Cairo, Old Cairo, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

wajmah SA Al Sayed, phd

Role: CONTACT

0509560055

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cha YH, O J, Park JK, Yang HM, Kim SH. Ultrasound-guided versus blind temporomandibular joint injections: a pilot cadaveric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;48(4):540-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30287106 (View on PubMed)

Lopez JP, Orjuela MP, Gonzalez LV, Peraza-Labrador AJ, Diaz-Baez D. Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Intra-Articular Injection with Different Substances After TMJ Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Apr;23(2):261-270. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02047-7. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38601255 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

arthroscope versus ultrasound

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.