A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-31

Study Completion Date

2030-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study tests whether an asthma medication called dupilumab can help people achieve complete asthma control (called "remission") when given earlier in their disease, before asthma becomes severe. Currently, most people with asthma only receive advanced treatments like biologics after their condition has worsened significantly and caused lung damage. This study explores whether treating high-risk patients earlier could prevent asthma attacks and lung function decline, potentially achieving remission before permanent damage occurs. The study is looking for adults aged 18-79 with moderate asthma who have had at least one asthma attack requiring steroid pills in the past 2 years, use medium or high-dose inhaled steroids regularly, have high levels of inflammation markers in their blood and breath tests, but don't yet meet criteria for severe asthma requiring biologic therapy. Participants receive either dupilumab or placebo injections every 2 weeks for one year, alongside their regular asthma medications. They attend clinic visits every 3 months for breathing tests, questionnaires, and safety monitoring. Neither participants nor doctors know who receives the real medication until the study ends. The goal is to learn whether early treatment with dupilumab helps more people achieve complete asthma control compared to standard care alone, potentially changing how asthma is treated from "waiting until severe" to "preventing severe disease." The study runs in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia, involving 150 participants

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Dupilumab in Participants With Asthma/Asthmatic Wheeze Aged 2 to <6 Years (LIBERTY ASTHMA TREKIDS)

NCT06191315

Wheezing Asthma

RECRUITING PHASE3

A Study in Male and Female Adolescent Participants With Severe Uncontrolled Asthma Starting Treatment With Dupilumab Injection (Dupixent®)

NCT05070663

Asthma

COMPLETED

Investigating Dupilumab's Effect in Asthma by Genotype

NCT03694158

Asthma

RECRUITING PHASE4

Double-blind, Multiple Dose Study of Tezepelumab (AMG 157) in Adults With Mild Atopic Asthma

NCT01405963

Asthma

COMPLETED PHASE1

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dupilumab on Exercise Capacity in Adult Patients With Asthma

NCT04203797

Asthma

COMPLETED PHASE4

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Asthma is a prevalent chronic respiratory disease for which 44% of people require oral corticosteroids (OCS) every year 1 . Whilst asthma is still managed on a damage-based schema allowing for unacceptable toxicities and irreversible airway remodelling, dupilumab and other type-2 targeting biologics have taught us that people with the highest type-2 inflammatory burden can achieve life-changing responses 2-6 . The term 'remission' has been used to describe the best possible outcome with biologics 5 . Across studies and molecules, remission was more likely to be achieved in people with shorter disease duration, lower morbidity, and higher type-2 inflammatory biomarkers 5,7-9 . These observations have increased interest in the earlier use of biologics in a Predict and Prevent framework 5,10-12 .

The HOTHOT study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the effect of dupilumab on induction of clinical remission outcomes in type-2 high patients recruited before they develop severe uncontrolled asthma meeting current biological treatment recommendations. Dupilumab will be compared with placebo in 150 patients undergoing traditional symptom-based inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) up- and down-titration (as per current asthma guidelines). The target population is at-risk type-2 high asthma, defined as at-least medium-dose ICS, with a previous history of a systemic corticosteroid (SCS)-treated asthma attack in the last 24 months and blood eosinophils ≥ 0.3×109/L plus exhaled nitric oxide ≥35 ppb. These inclusion criteria are unique because they will target people with asthma who are at risk of severe asthma attacks and lung function decline, also not meeting current biological prescription/reimbursement criteria. The one-year active treatment adjustment period of the study will test the hypothesis that remission outcomes are more likely to be achieved with early targeted intervention with dupilumab compared to traditional symptom-guided management, where ICS up- and down-titration occurs independently of the presence of type-2 inflammation. The primary outcome, the win ratio based on remission criteria, assesses the likelihood of achieving remission 'wins' based on a hierarchy of criteria, while the secondary remission multi-component (yes/no) outcome, a binary (yes/no) multi-component endpoint for remission, offers a straightforward and comprehensive measure. The primary and secondary remission outcome measurements are both powered to be statistically and clinically impactful to move the need forward in the field of asthma. If correct, the hypothesis that earlier intervention with dupilumab significantly induces remission will shift the treatment paradigm from the usual 'wait and react' approach to a proactive risk-based 'predict and prevent' intervention using earlier targeted therapy in at-risk type-2 inflammatory disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma Control

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blinded study assessing intervention versus placebo

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Volume-matched placebo injected subcut every 2 weeks

Dupilumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dupilumab Prefilled Syringe

Intervention Type DRUG

Dupilumab 400mg subcut x1 followed by 200mg subcut every 2 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dupilumab Prefilled Syringe

Dupilumab 400mg subcut x1 followed by 200mg subcut every 2 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Injection

Volume-matched placebo injected subcut every 2 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Study participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria apply:

Age

1. Participant must be 18-\<80 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.

Type of participant and disease characteristics
2. Physician diagnosis of asthma (according to GINA 2025) for ≥6 months, with documented historical airflow variability by one of the following:

* Positive reversibility test: ≥12% and 200 ml in FEV1 after SABA administration at any point prior to randomisation
* Airflow variability in clinic FEV1 \>12% and 200 mL between historical clinical visits
* Positive bronchial challenge test: fall in FEV1 of ≥20% with standard doses of methacholine (\<16 mg/mL or \<400mcg); or ≥10% with standardised hyperventilation, or exercise challenge test; or ≥15% with hypertonic saline or mannitol challenge
* Peak flow variability of \>20% between two assessments
3. Evidence of elevated type-2 biomarkers defined as both of:

1. peripheral BEC ≥ 0.3×109/L at screening visit
2. FeNO ≥ 35 ppb at screening visit
4. At least 1 asthma attack in the last 2 years, defined as acute asthma requiring SCS for ≥ 3 days or an emergency/hospital visit requiring SCS.
5. Treatment and evident adherence to a stable at-least medium-dose ICS (fluticasone propionate equivalent \>250 mcg/day) for at least 3 months (including run-in period) \[additional controllers e.g. LABA, LAMA or LTA are allowed\]. The ICS dosage will be defined as the dosage received on a regularly basis, excluding extra reliever doses taken in the context of anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy from the calculation. AIR is allowed in the context of the study. Thus, the high-dose ICS trial population (fluticasone propionate equivalent \>500 mcg/day)\* will represent patients who are not meeting the exacerbation criteria for biological reimbursement.

\*As per section 6.2, we will cap recruitment to 60% of target population on medium-dose ICS, 40% on high-dose ICS, with randomisation also stratified by these categories.
6. Presence of one (or more) of the following additional risk factors for asthma attacks32 at screening or baseline: (i) uncontrolled asthma symptoms indicated by ACQ5 score of ≥ 1.5; (ii) impaired lung function indicated by post-bronchodilator FEV1 of ≤ 80% predicted; (iii) high-dose maintenance ICS therapy (iv) severe asthma attack in past 1-\<12 months.

Sex, contraceptive/barrier method and pregnancy testing requirements
7. Female participants

a. A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies:

i. Is a woman of nonchildbearing potential (WONCBP) as defined in the Study Manual.

OR ii. Is a WOCBP and agrees to use a contraceptive method that is highly effective, with a failure rate of \<1%, during the intervention period (to be effective before starting the intervention) and for at least 12 weeks after the last dose of study intervention.

b. A WOCBP must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test at V1 (screening visit) and urine or serum pregnancy test (as required by local regulations) on Day 1 before the first dose of study intervention, c. If a urine test cannot be confirmed as negative (eg, an ambiguous result), a serum pregnancy test is required. In such cases, the participant must be excluded from participation if the serum pregnancy result is positive.

d. Additional requirements for pregnancy testing during and after study intervention are imposed.

e. The Investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a female participant with an early undetected pregnancy.

Informed consent
8. Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:

Medical conditions

1. Use of SCS \< 1 months prior to screening or on maintenance SCS.
2. Current tobacco smoker or recently stopped smoker (\<6 months)
3. Ex-smoker with greater than 10 pack-years AND post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal according to GLI race-neutral standards. 69
4. Documented nonadherence to ICS, defined as dispensing of less than 75% of the prescribed ICS dose over the past 12 months (or annualised if less than 12 months), based on pharmacy refill records checked at screening.
5. Presence of significant and uncorrectable inhaler technique deficiencies, as assessed by the research team during inhaler technique evaluation at screening.
6. Contra-indication to study drug
7. Immunological disease, condition or medication that may affect the inflammatory response according to Investigator.
8. History of other significant lung disease e.g. lung fibrosis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, clinically significant bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive lung disease, or Churg-Strauss.
9. Severe concomitant illness (including known or suspected immunodeficiency) that, in the Investigator's judgement will adversely affect the participant's participation in the study.
10. Active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years (except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin).
11. Exposure to monoclonal antibody therapy for asthma or another investigational medicinal product within 5 half-lives of the drug.
12. Eligibility to Dupilumab based on licensed and reimbursed indications in the participant's jurisdiction (e.g. nasal polyposis, atopic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, prurigo nodularis, etc.)
13. Treatment with live (attenuated) vaccine in the past 4 weeks.
14. Prohibited medication

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No