Central Nevus Removal Versus Conservative Treatment for Halo Nevus With Vitiligo: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT07307534

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-31

Study Completion Date

2027-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of central nevus removal versus conservative treatment in patients with halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo. It is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial involving 60 participants aged ≤50 years, who will be randomly assigned to either the nevus removal group or the conservative treatment group. The removal group will undergo surgical or laser excision of the central nevus followed by medication, while the conservative group will receive medication only. Both groups will be followed for 6 months. Outcomes include repigmentation assessment using vitiligo scoring indices, quality of life measures, and serial serum cytokine profiling. The study seeks to provide high-level evidence to guide clinical management of halo nevus with vitiligo. Key points:

1. For patients with halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo.
2. Compares nevus excision and conservative treatment.
3. Follows participants for 6 months.
4. Focuses on effectiveness and safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Halo nevus and vitiligo are both autoimmune pigment loss disorders that frequently co-occur and share overlapping immune pathways. Current management of halo nevus with vitiligo remains controversial: removal of the central nevus may eliminate an immune target and promote repigmentation but carries risks of Koebner phenomenon and scarring; conservative treatment avoids procedural trauma but may yield slower or suboptimal responses. Robust prospective comparisons of these strategies are lacking.

1. Study Design:

Single-center, randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients with halo nevus and non-segmental vitiligo (BSA ≤2%) will be randomized 1:1 to the excision group or the conservative group.
2. Excision group: Central nevus removal via CO₂ laser (if diameter \<0.3 cm) or surgical excision (if ≥0.3 cm), followed by standardized medication after 1 week.
3. Conservative group: Standardized medication only, without nevus removal. The standardized medication regimen is as follows:

For stable disease, apply topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily combined with NB-UVB phototherapy once every other day.

For active or progressive cases, oral prednisone (prednisone acetate, 0.3 mg/kg/day) is added to the above stable-stage regimen.
4. Duration: 6 months with follow-ups at 1, 3, 6 months.
5. Outcome Measures:

Primary Endpoint: Percentage of participants achieving VASl50 response Secondary Endpoints: Percentage of participants achieving VASI75 and VASI90 responses at each follow-up time point; changes in VASI, VSAS, VES, VETF scores; proportion of participants achieving lGA score improvement; patient-reported outcomes (DLQI/CDLQI, VitiQoL); incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events Other Pre-specified Outcomes: Changes in 12 serum cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α).
6. Statistical Methods: Categorical data will be presented as frequencies and percentages, continuous data as mean ± SD. Between-group comparisons will use chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test, or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Multivariate analysis will employ logistic regression. SPSS, R 4.3.2, and GraphPad Prism will be used for analysis (significance: p ≤ 0.05). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, with sensitivity analysis performed on the per-protocol (PP) population.
7. Ethics \& Compliance: Approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University. Informed consent is obtained from all participants' guardians.
8. Significance: This trial will systematically evaluate the clinical and immunological effects of central nevus removal versus conservative management in halo nevus with vitiligo, aiming to optimize treatment strategies and provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vitiligo Halo Nevus

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Vitiligo Halo nevus Randomized Controlled Trial Tacrolimus NB-UVB Nevus excision Treatment comparison Efficacy Safety VASI score

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a single-center, randomized controlled study. Participants are randomly assigned to two groups, receiving central nevus excision plus medication or conservative medication only, respectively. The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the two interventions for treating halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Central Nevus Excision Group

Participants in this arm undergo surgical or laser excision of the central nevus, with standardized medication initiated one week postoperatively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Central Nevus Excision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants undergo removal of the central halo nevus based on its diameter:

Diameter \<0.3 cm: CO₂ laser ablation. Diameter ≥0.3 cm: Surgical excision. All procedures are performed under local anesthesia with strict aseptic technique. Postoperative care and wound management are provided according to standard protocols.

The Standardized Medication Regimen

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

For stable disease, apply topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily combined with NB-UVB phototherapy once every other day.

For active or progressive cases, oral prednisone (prednisone acetate, 0.3 mg/kg/day) is added to the above stable-stage regimen.

Conservative Treatment Group

Participants in this arm receive standardized medication only without nevus removal.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The Standardized Medication Regimen

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

For stable disease, apply topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily combined with NB-UVB phototherapy once every other day.

For active or progressive cases, oral prednisone (prednisone acetate, 0.3 mg/kg/day) is added to the above stable-stage regimen.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Central Nevus Excision

Participants undergo removal of the central halo nevus based on its diameter:

Diameter \<0.3 cm: CO₂ laser ablation. Diameter ≥0.3 cm: Surgical excision. All procedures are performed under local anesthesia with strict aseptic technique. Postoperative care and wound management are provided according to standard protocols.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Standardized Medication Regimen

For stable disease, apply topical 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily combined with NB-UVB phototherapy once every other day.

For active or progressive cases, oral prednisone (prednisone acetate, 0.3 mg/kg/day) is added to the above stable-stage regimen.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with halo nevus accompanied by non-segmental vitiligo, with BSA ≤2% (excluding acral regions).

* Central nevus confirmed as benign melanocytic nevus through clinical observation and dermatoscope.

* Age ≤50 years, regardless of gender ④ Physically able to tolerate surgery and local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring (to avoid abnormal hyperplasia at the operative site and interference with repigmentation assessment)

* Other autoimmune diseases (e.g., hyperthyroidism)

* Patients with significant endocrine disorders, psychiatric conditions, hematologic diseases, hepatic/renal disorders, cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases, severe infections, or other major systemic illnesses

* Use of hormonal medications, immunomodulators, or phototherapy within the past 1 month ⑤ Pregnant or lactating women ⑥ Allergy to anesthetic agents or excipients

* Poor psychological status or compliance, unable to cooperate with postoperative follow-up or care ⑧ Concurrent conditions requiring other treatments that may interfere with the study observations
Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Xijing Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhe Jian

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xijing Hospital

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zhe Jian

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 8615332332587

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhe Jian

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XJPF-LCY-V2025121

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id