Evaluating the Level of Agreement Between Goniometer Measurements and Algorithm to Determine Wall Squat Position

NCT ID: NCT07297485

Last Updated: 2025-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-15

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The wall squat exercise has been used in several research studies to help lower blood pressure. However, setting up the correct squat position often involves using a joint angle-measuring tool called a goniometer to get the knee at exactly the right angle. To set up the wall squat using a goniometer, someone has to stand in position, hold still while their knee angle is measured and adjusted, and then measure how high they should squat. This takes time, can be uncomfortable, and can be difficult to hold steady. This can make it difficult to get accurate measurements, particularly for people who are not used to exercise.

Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore if a squat height calculator (based on leg bone measurements) to work out the squat height agrees with goniometer measurements for specific knee joint angles.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The isometric wall squat exercise has been used as an intervention in several research studies (Lea et al., 2021; Wiles et al., 2021; Lea, O'Driscoll and Wiles, 2024). However, how the protocol is delivered can vary between researchers; for example Lea, O'Driscoll and Wiles (2024) asked participants to adjust their foot position to keep lower leg vertical with the wall while lowering onto a squat position; while Lea et al. (2021) used a standard goniometer in conjunction with a spirit level to establish knee joint angle and limb position. Therefore, to ensure study reliability and repeatability a standardised protocol to ensure consistent limb position needs to be established. Traditionally, measurement of joint angles and limb range of movement (ROM) using a standard universal goniometer is deemed gold standard in clinical settings. While the goniometer is portable and relatively inexpensive it has several limitations in terms of practical use (Hanks and Myers, 2023). Firstly, both hands are required to align and stabilise the goniometer positioning, and maintaining the alignment during movement can be problematic. Also, the use of a standard universal goniometer requires alignment with specified bony landmarks, some of which are not visually located or palpated with ease and require a good level of underpinning anatomical knowledge (Kiatkulanusorn et al., 2023). Moreover, the level of accuracy in goniometer alignment can be further reduced when observing intertester measurements. Consequently, challenges with goniometer alignment and stabilisation, alongside intertester variability, may lead to errors in measurement (Hanks and Myers, 2023).

Using a standard universal goniometer in combination with a spirit level to establish the isometric wall squat position requires a baseline weight bearing position to be maintained while correct limb positions and knee joint angle are established, and squat height measurements recorded. This may be time consuming, uncomfortable, and difficult to maintain for untrained populations, particularly within the more acute degree angles, leading to difficulties in determining accurate baseline measurements. Therefore, an alternative method to determine squat position would be beneficial for the development and standardisation of the protocol. As linear bone growth typically ceases at \~18 yrs for females, and \~21yrs for males, limb length in the healthy adult population remains relatively consistent. Recent research has explored the use of artificial intelligence algorithms to predict overall height from femoral and tibial bone lengths (Simon et al., 2023). Therefore, based on this principle, this study aims to explore if using a squat height calculator algorithm, utilising tibial and femoral bone lengths, agrees with gold standard universal goniometer measurements to ascertain positioning for an isometric wall squat at specific knee joint angles

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wall Squat Position

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Goniometer Algorithm Wall Squat Level of Agreement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Wall Squat Position

Participants will have femur and fibula length (cm) measurements taken and complete both protocols unshod.

Protocol 1 - Goniometer Squat Position Protocol A universal standard long arm goniometer will be aligned for knee flexion and held in position using soft velcro straps. A spirit level will establish and maintain vertical alignment of the fibula during the protocol. Participants will assume a 5-stage wall squat position. At each squat stage measurements for squat heigh at width will be recorded.

Protocol 2 - Squat Height Calculator Femur and fibula bone measurements will be entered into the squat height calculator algorithm to determine the the 5-stage squat measurements.

Markers will be placed on a squat height ruler for the height and width at each stage. Participants will be asked to align the lateral malleolus and greater trochanter with the markers and the joint angle measured using a universal standard long arm goniometer for each stage.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\>21 years; Written informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria

Orthopaedic problems or injury affecting the hip, knee, or ankle joints; Inability to stand unaided and hold a static position for \>5 minutes
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northumbria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gabriel Cucato, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northumbria University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northumbria University

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Helen Llewellyn, MSc

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +447949026070

Email: [email protected]

Gabriel Cucato, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Helen Llewellyn, MSc

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Simon S, Fischer B, Rinner A, Hummer A, Frank BJH, Mitterer JA, Huber S, Aichmair A, Schwarz GM, Hofstaetter JG. Body height estimation from automated length measurements on standing long leg radiographs using artificial intelligence. Sci Rep. 2023 May 25;13(1):8504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34670-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37231033 (View on PubMed)

Kiatkulanusorn S, Luangpon N, Srijunto W, Watechagit S, Pitchayadejanant K, Kuharat S, Beg OA, Suato BP. Analysis of the concurrent validity and reliability of five common clinical goniometric devices. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 27;13(1):20931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48344-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38017058 (View on PubMed)

Hanks J, Myers B. Validity, Reliability, and Efficiency of a Standard Goniometer, Medical Inclinometer, and Builder's Inclinometer. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Aug 1;18(4):989-996. doi: 10.26603/001c.83944. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37547826 (View on PubMed)

Lea JWD, O'Driscoll JM, Hulbert S, Scales J, Wiles JD. Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022 Jan 8;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00386-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35000021 (View on PubMed)

Wiles J, Rees-Roberts M, O'Driscoll JM, Doulton T, MacInnes D, Short V, Pellatt-Higgins T, Saxby K, Gousia K, West A, Smith M, Santer E, Darby J, Farmer CK. Feasibility study to assess the delivery of a novel isometric exercise intervention for people with stage 1 hypertension in the NHS: protocol for the IsoFIT-BP study including amendments to mitigate the risk of COVID-19. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 28;7(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00925-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34711266 (View on PubMed)

Lea JWD, O'Driscoll JM, Wiles JD. The implementation of a home-based isometric wall squat intervention using ratings of perceived exertion to select and control exercise intensity: a pilot study in normotensive and pre-hypertensive adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Jan;124(1):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05269-2. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37458822 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10240

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id