Evaluating the Level of Agreement Between Goniometer Measurements and Algorithm to Determine Wall Squat Position
NCT ID: NCT07297485
Last Updated: 2025-12-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-15
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore if a squat height calculator (based on leg bone measurements) to work out the squat height agrees with goniometer measurements for specific knee joint angles.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Using a standard universal goniometer in combination with a spirit level to establish the isometric wall squat position requires a baseline weight bearing position to be maintained while correct limb positions and knee joint angle are established, and squat height measurements recorded. This may be time consuming, uncomfortable, and difficult to maintain for untrained populations, particularly within the more acute degree angles, leading to difficulties in determining accurate baseline measurements. Therefore, an alternative method to determine squat position would be beneficial for the development and standardisation of the protocol. As linear bone growth typically ceases at \~18 yrs for females, and \~21yrs for males, limb length in the healthy adult population remains relatively consistent. Recent research has explored the use of artificial intelligence algorithms to predict overall height from femoral and tibial bone lengths (Simon et al., 2023). Therefore, based on this principle, this study aims to explore if using a squat height calculator algorithm, utilising tibial and femoral bone lengths, agrees with gold standard universal goniometer measurements to ascertain positioning for an isometric wall squat at specific knee joint angles
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Wall Squat Position
Participants will have femur and fibula length (cm) measurements taken and complete both protocols unshod.
Protocol 1 - Goniometer Squat Position Protocol A universal standard long arm goniometer will be aligned for knee flexion and held in position using soft velcro straps. A spirit level will establish and maintain vertical alignment of the fibula during the protocol. Participants will assume a 5-stage wall squat position. At each squat stage measurements for squat heigh at width will be recorded.
Protocol 2 - Squat Height Calculator Femur and fibula bone measurements will be entered into the squat height calculator algorithm to determine the the 5-stage squat measurements.
Markers will be placed on a squat height ruler for the height and width at each stage. Participants will be asked to align the lateral malleolus and greater trochanter with the markers and the joint angle measured using a universal standard long arm goniometer for each stage.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northumbria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gabriel Cucato, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northumbria University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northumbria University
Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Helen Llewellyn, MSc
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Simon S, Fischer B, Rinner A, Hummer A, Frank BJH, Mitterer JA, Huber S, Aichmair A, Schwarz GM, Hofstaetter JG. Body height estimation from automated length measurements on standing long leg radiographs using artificial intelligence. Sci Rep. 2023 May 25;13(1):8504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34670-2.
Kiatkulanusorn S, Luangpon N, Srijunto W, Watechagit S, Pitchayadejanant K, Kuharat S, Beg OA, Suato BP. Analysis of the concurrent validity and reliability of five common clinical goniometric devices. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 27;13(1):20931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48344-6.
Hanks J, Myers B. Validity, Reliability, and Efficiency of a Standard Goniometer, Medical Inclinometer, and Builder's Inclinometer. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Aug 1;18(4):989-996. doi: 10.26603/001c.83944. eCollection 2023.
Lea JWD, O'Driscoll JM, Hulbert S, Scales J, Wiles JD. Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med Open. 2022 Jan 8;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00386-8.
Wiles J, Rees-Roberts M, O'Driscoll JM, Doulton T, MacInnes D, Short V, Pellatt-Higgins T, Saxby K, Gousia K, West A, Smith M, Santer E, Darby J, Farmer CK. Feasibility study to assess the delivery of a novel isometric exercise intervention for people with stage 1 hypertension in the NHS: protocol for the IsoFIT-BP study including amendments to mitigate the risk of COVID-19. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 28;7(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00925-w.
Lea JWD, O'Driscoll JM, Wiles JD. The implementation of a home-based isometric wall squat intervention using ratings of perceived exertion to select and control exercise intensity: a pilot study in normotensive and pre-hypertensive adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Jan;124(1):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05269-2. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id