Expert Consensus on the Clinical Management of Melasma: A Delphi Method Study
NCT ID: NCT07296549
Last Updated: 2025-12-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-06-01
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will be conducted in multiple rounds:
Round 1: Experts will provide open-ended feedback on their experiences and perspectives on melasma treatment.
Round 2: Based on the responses from Round 1, a refined set of questions will be circulated to clarify or expand on the issues raised.
Round 3: A final round will help refine and solidify the consensus on treatment approaches and care protocols.
The experts' feedback will be anonymized to ensure unbiased responses, and each round will be followed by analysis to identify areas of agreement and disagreement. The goal is to achieve a high level of consensus (usually around 70%) on key treatment recommendations and best practices for managing melasma.
This process will result in evidence-based guidelines for melasma treatment that healthcare providers can use to standardize care and improve patient outcomes. These guidelines will help address the variability in treatment practices and ensure that patients receive the most effective and up-to-date care based on expert consensus.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Expert Panel
A cohort of dermatology and aesthetic medicine experts participating in a Modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations on the management of melasma
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum of 5 years of post-certification clinical experience in the management of MELASMA,
* Willingness to participate in all Delphi rounds.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lack of clinical experience with MELASMA
* Industry representatives without direct clinical practice
25 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Venus Research Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Venus Research Center
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Melasma Consensus
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id