RESCUE Study (REcurrent Ovarian Cancer Secondary Cytoreduction Using Chemotherapy rEsponse)

NCT ID: NCT07295132

Last Updated: 2025-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-15

Study Completion Date

2029-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label Phase III clinical trial (RESCUE study) evaluating the efficacy of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who have shown a favorable response to 3-4 cycles of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are assessed as highly likely to achieve complete tumor resection based on selection models. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the experimental arm, receiving SCS followed by chemotherapy (with or without maintenance), or the active comparator arm, receiving chemotherapy only (with or without maintenance), with the primary objective being to compare the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) between the two groups to determine the additional clinical benefit of SCS in this carefully selected patient population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The RESCUE study is a major clinical trial focused on improving treatment for women battling recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. These cancers, which often return after initial treatment, are known to be aggressive. The challenge for doctors is deciding when and if a second major surgery, known as secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS), will truly benefit the patient.

The Study's Focus: When is Surgery Best?

Currently, when the cancer returns, patients receive chemotherapy. The key question is whether adding a challenging surgery (SCS) to the chemotherapy offers better survival chances than chemotherapy alone. Past studies have suggested that SCS is only helpful if the surgeon can remove all visible signs of cancer.

The RESCUE study addresses this by using a modern, personalized approach:

Selection: The study enrolls patients whose cancer is platinum-sensitive (meaning it responded well to the initial platinum-based chemotherapy).

Pre-Surgical Test: Patients first receive several cycles of chemotherapy. During this time, the research team uses a special model to analyze how quickly a tumor marker called CA-125 decreases. This dynamic change in the marker helps doctors predict, with greater accuracy than ever before, which patients are most likely to achieve a complete resection (removal of all visible disease) during surgery.

Randomization: Patients who are identified as strong candidates for complete resection are then randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) into one of two groups:

Group 1 (Experimental): Receive the carefully planned secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by the rest of their chemotherapy.

Group 2 (Control): Continue with chemotherapy alone, without the surgery.

The Goal

The primary goal of the RESCUE study is to determine if adding secondary cytoreductive surgery provides a significant advantage in Progression-Free Survival (PFS)-the length of time a patient lives without their cancer getting worse-for this highly selected group of patients.

By meticulously selecting the patients most likely to benefit from surgery, this trial aims to establish a new standard of care, ensuring that this major surgical procedure is performed only when it is expected to yield the best possible outcome for the patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Cancer Recurrent Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer secondary cytoreductive surgery neoadjuvant chemotherapy CA-125 response

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In this study, following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients are randomized to one of two arms: either receiving Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery followed by the remaining chemotherapy, or continuing with chemotherapy alone, in order to evaluate which strategy leads to superior Progression-Free Survival.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgery

Neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and Secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by the remaining chemotherapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Secondary cytoreductive surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery (SCS) is a surgical procedure performed on patients with relapsed or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, after they have completed their initial course of treatment (such as primary surgery and chemotherapy).

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

No surgery

platinum-based chemotherapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery

Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery (SCS) is a surgical procedure performed on patients with relapsed or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, after they have completed their initial course of treatment (such as primary surgery and chemotherapy).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First recurrence of platinum-sensitive, invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, regardless of initial stage.
* A progression-free interval of at least 6 months after the end of the last platinum-containing regimen.
* Demonstrated response during neoadjuvant chemotherapy after recurrence (Complete Response/Partial Response/Stable Disease according to RECIST 1.1 or GCIG CA-125 response, which is a ≥50% reduction in pre-treatment CA-125 level sustained for ≥28 days).
* Women aged 19 years or older.
* The tumor is judged to be completely resectable by surgery (R0) based on the judgment of an experienced surgeon
* Patients who provide signed and written informed consent and consent to data transfer and processing.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients without recurrence
* Patients with non-epithelial tumors or borderline tumors.
* Patients with second, third, or subsequent recurrence.
* Patients with a secondary malignancy treated with laparotomy and other neoplasms, where the treatment is expected to interfere with the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer or significantly affect prognosis.
* Patients with platinum-refractory tumors (i.e., progression during chemotherapy or recurrence within 6 months after the end of the previous first platinum-containing regimen).
* Cases where only palliative surgery is planned.
* Radiological signs suggestive of metastasis that are considered completely unresectable.
* Any comorbidity that precludes surgery and/or chemotherapy (e.g., poor general condition, severe infection, conditions that may cause severe bleeding, severe renal disease, etc.).
* Any medical history that may cause excessive surgical risk pre- or post-operatively.
* Medications being taken that pose a significant surgical risk (e.g., oral anticoagulants, bleeding risk due to bevacizumab).
* Absence of evaluable archived tumor tissue.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Asan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dae-Yeon Kim

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dae-Yeon Kim

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asam Medical Center

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dae-Yeon Kim, MD. PhD.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +82-2-30103748

Email: [email protected]

Hyun-Woong Cho, MD. PhD.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +82-2-30101033

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RS-2025-02273048

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RS-2025-02273048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id