Permissive Versus Strict Intrapartum Glucose Management in Type 1 Diabetes (PRISM-T1D)

NCT ID: NCT07293715

Last Updated: 2025-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-15

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PRISM-TID is a single center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of permissive intrapartum glucose management (intervention) versus strict intrapartum glucose management (standard of care) among pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using hybrid closed loop therapy (HCL) who are admitted for labor management. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of two intrapartum glycemic control options: permissive (70-140 mg/dL) or strict (70-110 mg/dL). The primary aim of this trial it to demonstrate that permissive intrapartum glucose management is not associated with an increased risk of neonatal dysglycemia compared with strict intrapartum glucose management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) affects approximately 0.5% of pregnancies in the US. Infants born to individuals with T1D are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to lack of glycemic control. Individuals with T1D are increasingly using hybrid closed loop therapy (HCL) for insulin delivery to achieve glycemic control. Current data highlight that less permissive intrapartum (while in labor) glycemic control is not associated with a increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycemia and NICU admission. However, such data about permissive versus strict intrapartum glucose management has primarily been from pregnant individuals with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes who did not use HCL based insulin therapy. Pregnant individuals with diabetes who use HCL with continuous glucose monitoring and closed loop insulin delivery represent a unique population, and data from this population are needed to inform intrapartum obstetric management. The investigators hypothesize that permissive intrapartum glucose management using continuous glucose monitoring (70-140 mg/dL) will not be associated with neonatal dysglycemia measured as first mean neonatal glucose value within the first two hours of life compared with strict intrapartum glucose management or the current standard of care (70-110 mg/dL). The investigators will conduct a single center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of permissive intrapartum glucose management (intervention) versus strict intrapartum glucose management (standard of care) among pregnant individuals with T1D using HCL who are admitted for labor management. The primary aim of this trial it to demonstrate that permissive intrapartum glucose management is not associated with an increased risk of neonatal dysglycemia (first neonatal blood glucose measured within 2 hours of life) compared with strict intrapartum glucose management. The investigators will secondarily examine the association between permissive versus strict intrapartum glucose with adverse neonatal outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and NICU admission, patient satisfaction, and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) metrics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy, High Risk Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pregnancy Continuous Glucose Monitor Type 1 Diabetes Automated insulin delivery Hybrid closed loop Insulin pump

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

permissive blood sugar control (70-140 mg/dL)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Insulin

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of two intrapartum glycemic control options: permissive (70-140 mg/dL) or strict (70-110 mg/dL). Participants and clinicians will be unblinded. Once randomized, an order set will be entered into the EMR that will alert pharmacy and nursing colleagues to the appropriate intrapartum glycemic control protocol.

DEXCOM Continuous Glucose Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be asked to wear an optional Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) to utilize during labor for research purposes. The CGM will be removed prior to hospital discharge and data will be extracted by trained research personnel. All participants already utilize a CGM device as part of standard of care as part of Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) therapy. No clinical decisions will be made based upon data from the research CGM device. This data will not be extracted until after hospital discharge.

Standard of care

strict blood sugar control (70-110 mg/dL)

Group Type OTHER

Insulin

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of two intrapartum glycemic control options: permissive (70-140 mg/dL) or strict (70-110 mg/dL). Participants and clinicians will be unblinded. Once randomized, an order set will be entered into the EMR that will alert pharmacy and nursing colleagues to the appropriate intrapartum glycemic control protocol.

DEXCOM Continuous Glucose Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be asked to wear an optional Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) to utilize during labor for research purposes. The CGM will be removed prior to hospital discharge and data will be extracted by trained research personnel. All participants already utilize a CGM device as part of standard of care as part of Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) therapy. No clinical decisions will be made based upon data from the research CGM device. This data will not be extracted until after hospital discharge.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Insulin

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of two intrapartum glycemic control options: permissive (70-140 mg/dL) or strict (70-110 mg/dL). Participants and clinicians will be unblinded. Once randomized, an order set will be entered into the EMR that will alert pharmacy and nursing colleagues to the appropriate intrapartum glycemic control protocol.

Intervention Type DRUG

DEXCOM Continuous Glucose Monitor

Patients will be asked to wear an optional Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) to utilize during labor for research purposes. The CGM will be removed prior to hospital discharge and data will be extracted by trained research personnel. All participants already utilize a CGM device as part of standard of care as part of Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) therapy. No clinical decisions will be made based upon data from the research CGM device. This data will not be extracted until after hospital discharge.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant individuals
* ≥ 18 years old
* Type 1 diabetes utilizing Hybrid Closed Loop (HCL) therapy
* Intention for vaginal delivery and admitted to Labor and Delivery
* Singleton, non-anomalous fetus
* Gestational age greater than or equal to 35 weeks gestation.
* Cervical dilation is less than 6 cm.
* Delivering at the study institution

Exclusion Criteria

* Scheduled cesarean delivery
* Cervical dilation ≥ 6 cm on presentation to L\&D
* Receipt of antenatal corticosteroids within 7 days of randomization
* Fetal demise
* Major fetal anomaly (attached)
* Multiple gestation
* Non-English speaking
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kartik K Venkatesh

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna Brewton, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Kartik K Venkatesh, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center OB/GYN Maternal and Fetal Medicine

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Anna Brewton, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 614-293-8045

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kartik Venkatesh, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY 20252532

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id