PEEP Titration Guided by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Laparoscopic Surgery The PEaRL Study
NCT ID: NCT07289113
Last Updated: 2025-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-31
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Laparoscopic surgery has gained widespread adoption due to its minimally invasive nature, offering advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster functional recovery compared with traditional open surgery. Nevertheless, postoperative respiratory complications remain a major source of morbidity. Factors such as general anesthesia, the Trendelenburg position, and CO₂ pneumoperitoneum can impair respiratory mechanics, reduce total lung capacity, and promote atelectasis, leading to compromised gas exchange.
Rationale:
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is routinely applied to prevent alveolar collapse and improve oxygenation during mechanical ventilation. However, the use of standardized, non-individualized PEEP levels may be suboptimal, as inappropriate settings can cause alveolar overdistension or persistent collapse. Personalized PEEP titration, tailored to patient-specific lung mechanics, has recently emerged as a promising strategy to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).
Methods and Tools:
Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, bedside monitoring technique that enables real-time assessment of regional lung ventilation. By evaluating ventilated and non-ventilated lung areas, EIT can guide PEEP optimization and support individualized ventilatory management. Recent studies suggest that EIT-guided PEEP titration improves respiratory parameters and reduces atelectasis in patients undergoing major surgery.
Objective:
The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of EIT-guided PEEP personalization in patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Primary endpoints include improvements in regional ventilation, respiratory system compliance, and intraoperative gas exchange, as well as postoperative pulmonary function.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a widely used strategy to prevent alveolar collapse and improve oxygenation during mechanical ventilation. Nevertheless, the application of a standardized, non-individualized PEEP level may not be optimal for all patients, and an inappropriate PEEP setting may lead to alveolar overdistension or persistence of collapsed areas (3). Recently, personalized PEEP titration has gained attention as a method to tailor ventilation settings to individual patient characteristics, thereby minimizing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) (4).
Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, bedside imaging technique that enables real-time assessment of the regional distribution of pulmonary ventilation. EIT allows continuous monitoring of the effects of PEEP on both ventilated and non-ventilated lung regions and can guide the optimization of individualized PEEP levels to improve ventilation distribution and reduce the risk of respiratory complications (5-6). Recent studies have shown that the use of EIT-guided PEEP personalization in patients undergoing major surgery can improve respiratory parameters and reduce atelectasis formation (7-8). Specifically, EIT enables the performance of a PEEP trial, during which the device identifies areas of alveolar overdistension or collapse in response to PEEP changes, thereby guiding personalized ventilatory settings.
However, the application of this technique in the context of laparoscopic surgery remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of EIT-guided PEEP personalization in patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic procedures, with the goal of improving regional ventilation, respiratory system compliance, and intraoperative gas exchange, as well as postoperative pulmonary function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard PEEP
PEEP value will be decided by clinician
No interventions assigned to this group
EIT PEEP
PEEP value will be set after a PEEP trial performed with EIT machine
A PEEP trial performed with the PulmoVista® 500 (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) is a procedure designed to identify the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure
During the trial, stepwise adjustments of PEEP are made while EIT provides real-time, bedside visualization of ventilation distribution across different lung regions. Typically, the protocol involves a recruitment maneuver followed by incremental and/or decremental PEEP steps (for example, in 2-3 cmH₂O intervals). At each step, EIT measures changes in regional impedance, which reflect variations in local lung aeration and ventilation.
By analyzing these parameters, clinicians can determine the individualized "best PEEP", defined as the point at which alveolar collapse is minimized without causing significant overdistension. The optimal PEEP is then set for subsequent ventilation management.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A PEEP trial performed with the PulmoVista® 500 (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany) is a procedure designed to identify the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure
During the trial, stepwise adjustments of PEEP are made while EIT provides real-time, bedside visualization of ventilation distribution across different lung regions. Typically, the protocol involves a recruitment maneuver followed by incremental and/or decremental PEEP steps (for example, in 2-3 cmH₂O intervals). At each step, EIT measures changes in regional impedance, which reflect variations in local lung aeration and ventilation.
By analyzing these parameters, clinicians can determine the individualized "best PEEP", defined as the point at which alveolar collapse is minimized without causing significant overdistension. The optimal PEEP is then set for subsequent ventilation management.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute respiratory failure
* Hemodynamic instability
* Pregnancy
* Contraindications for EIT device
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tommaso Fossali
Medical Doctor, head of the anesthesiologists
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tommaso Fossali, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Luigi Guglielmetti, MD
Role: CONTACT
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ma X, Fu Y, Piao X, De Santis Santiago RR, Ma L, Guo Y, Fu Q, Mi W, Berra L, Zhang C. Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure titrated intra-operatively by electrical impedance tomography optimises pulmonary mechanics and reduces postoperative atelectasis: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Nov 1;40(11):805-816. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001901. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
Rauseo M, Spadaro S, Mirabella L, Cotoia A, Laforgia D, Gaudino G, Vinella F, Ferrara G, Gattullo A, Tullo L, Cinnella G. Electrical Impedance Tomography during Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery: A Physiological Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 1;12(23):7467. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237467.
Jiang L, Deng Y, Xu F, Qiao S, Wang C. Individualized PEEP guided by EIT in patients undergoing general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun;94:111397. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111397. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
Pavlovsky B, Desprez C, Richard JC, Fage N, Lesimple A, Chean D, Courtais A, Mauri T, Mercat A, Beloncle F. Bedside personalized methods based on electrical impedance tomography or respiratory mechanics to set PEEP in ARDS and recruitment-to-inflation ratio: a physiologic study. Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jan 5;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01228-4.
Gao Y, He H, Chi Y, Frerichs I, Long Y, Zhao Z. Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Nov 23;24(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03394-y.
Chen L, Yu K, Yang J, Han X, Liu L, Li T, Miao H. Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration for perioperative oxygenation and postoperative pulmonary complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 27;103(52):e40357. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040357.
Scaramuzzo G, Priani P, Ferrara P, Verri M, Montanaro F, La Rosa R, Cammarota G, Volta CA, Spadaro S. Longitudinal changes of electrical impedance tomography-based best PEEP in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A prospective physiological study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2025 Sep;44(5):101569. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101569. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CET 341-2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id