A Multi-Center, Prospective Historically Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Triadyme-C to a Total Disc Replacement Control Cohort in the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease (SCDD) at a Single Level
NCT ID: NCT07287449
Last Updated: 2025-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-05
2029-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Safety and Effectiveness of Triadyme-C
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Triadyme-C device in comparison to other approved TDRs in the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) in subjects who are symptomatic at only a single level from C3 to C7 that are unresponsive to conservative management.
Triadyme-C
Triadyme-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Triadyme-C
Triadyme-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy of the cervical spine, with pain, paresthesia or paralysis in a specific nerve root distribution C3 through C7, including at least one of the following:
1. Neck and/or arm pain (at least 30 mm on the 100 mm visual analogue scale \[VAS\] scale).
2. Decreased muscle strength of at least one level on the clinical evaluation 0 to 5 scale.
3. Abnormal sensation including hyperesthesia or hypoesthesia; and/or
4. Abnormal reflexes.
3. Symptomatic at a single level from C3 to C7.
4. Radiographically determined pathology at the level to be treated correlating to primary symptoms including at least one of the following:
1. Decreased disc height on radiography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to a normal adjacent disc.
2. Degenerative spondylosis on CT or MRI.
3. Disc herniation on CT or MRI.
5. Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score ≥ 30 (out of 100).
6. Unresponsive to non-operative, conservative treatment (e.g., rest, heat, electrotherapy, physical therapy, chiropractic care and/or analgesics) for:
1. At least six weeks from radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy symptom onset; or
2. Have the presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression despite continued non-operative conservative treatment.
7. Appropriate for treatment using an anterior surgical approach.
8. Reported to be medically cleared for surgery.
9. Reported to be physically and mentally able and willing to comply with the Protocol, including the ability to read and complete required forms and willing and able to adhere to the scheduled follow-up visits and requirements of the Protocol.
10. Written informed consent provided by subject.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Have a history of or anticipated treatment for active systemic infection, including HIV or Hepatitis C.
3. Have more than one immobile vertebral level between C1 to C7 from any cause including but not limited to congenital abnormalities and osteoarthritic "spontaneous" fusions.
4. Have previous trauma to the C3 to C7 levels resulting in significant bony or disco-ligamentous cervical spine injury.
5. Prior attempted or completed cervical spine surgery at any cervical level, except (1) a minimally invasive decompression that did not de-stabilize the segment upon flexion/extension or (2) a successful single-level anterior cervical fusion at non-index level (greater than 6 months prior to scheduled surgical treatment).
6. Have axial neck pain in the absence of other symptoms of radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy justifying the need for surgical intervention.
7. Have disc height less than 3 mm as measured from the center of the disc in a neutral position.
8. Evidence of symptomatic moderate to severe facet joint degeneration or disease where the investigator feels this is a major contributor to the subject's pain as diagnosed by injection and imaging.
9. Have osteoporosis or is an increased risk of osteoporosis/osteopenia defined as a T-score less than -1.5 (i.e., -1.6, -1.7, etc.).
1. The SCORE/MORES will be used to screen if a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan is required. If SCORE/MORES value ≥ 6, then a DEXA is required.
2. An existing DEXA is allowed if completed within 12 months of subject surgery.
10. Have diabetes mellitus requiring daily insulin management.
11. Have severe myelopathy to the extent that the patient is wheelchair bound.
12. Have Paget's disease, osteomalacia or any other metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis, which is addressed above (i.e., Exclusion #9).
13. Have active malignancy that includes a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) unless the subject had been treated with curative intent and there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least five years.
14. Have tumor as source of symptoms.
15. Have Symptomatic Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (SDDD) or significant cervical spondylosis at two or more levels.
16. Have spondylolysis.
17. Have arachnoiditis.
18. Have marked cervical instability on resting (neutral) lateral or flexion-extension radiographs demonstrated by:
1. Translation ≥ 3.5 mm, and/or
2. Greater than 11° angular difference to that of either adjacent level.
19. Have a known allergy to implant materials (titanium, Ti-6Al-4V alloy, TiC, or SnCoCrMo alloy).
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dymicron EU GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO-22012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id