Advance Choice Document Implementation

NCT ID: NCT07284368

Last Updated: 2025-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

374 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-29

Study Completion Date

2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Advance Choice Documents (ACDs) are statements of preferences for mental health care and treatment made when service users have capacity to do so. This is done with their care team and others as desired, e.g. carers/supporters or advocates. In addition to improving therapeutic relationships, ACDs have been shown to reduce compulsory psychiatric admissions by 25%.

South London and Maudsley is currently implementing ACDs into routine practice across its services and the Advance Choice Document Implementation (ACDI) project, run by researchers at King's College London, is supporting the development of related resources and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation. Advisory groups will also guide the study approach throughout.

The project comprises four work packages. Work Package 1 involves focus groups with stakeholders (service users, carers, staff) to inform implementation for Older Adults and CAMHS services. This is to understand the barriers and facilitators for ACD implementation in these services; and learn what adaptations are needed to the ACD resources and procedures for use in these services

Work Package 2 is a prospective study of ACD completion and use throughout all directorates. This will comprise interviews with service users after ACD creation and after an event where the ACD is expected to have been used; interviews with their care-team during expected use events; and interviews/focus groups with staff facilitating the creation of ACDs to understand the integration of their role in SLaM.

Work Package 3 is a retrospective study examining the impact of ACD creation on health service use and routinely collected outcomes. Work Package 4 is a prospective study of ACD use and its relationship to ACD content. Work Packages 3 and 4 will use de-identified data collected via South London an Maudsley's Clinical Records Interactive search System (CRIS).

For more information on ACDI, the people involved, and related publications, please visit: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/acdi

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Detention Under the Mental Health Act

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACD holders

service users with a history of detention under the Mental Health Act that create Advance Choice Documents

Advance Choice Document Implementation

Intervention Type OTHER

Creation and application of Advance Choice Documents

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Advance Choice Document Implementation

Creation and application of Advance Choice Documents

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

WP1: Focus Groups Service users-Young people Aged ≥ 16 Experienced detention under the MHA while in the care of CAMHS Currently under the care of community mental health services (CAMHS / EI / CMHT)

Older adults

1. Experienced detention under the MHA while under services for Older Adults
2. Currently under the care of older adult community mental health services

Carers / Informal supporters Aged ≥ 16 years A relative or friend of a service user who is eligible for the study

Professionals Professional potentially involved in supporting the completion of ACDs (i.e., community mental health team (CMHT) staff, advocates, peer workers) SLaM professionals potentially involved in referring to ACDs (i.e., inpatient and emergency department liaison mental health staff, home treatment, place of safety and street triage staff) Approved mental health professionals (AMHPs) and Section 12 (MHA) approved doctors involved in detention.

Ambulance, prison mental health and Emergency Department staff General Practitioners, including mental health leads, or other primary care professionals who care for people with SMI discharged from secondary services

WP 2: Prospective study of ACD completion and use Service users All service users: accepted referral to an ACD facilitator for ACD creation Young people

1. Aged ≥ 16
2. Experienced detention under the MHA while in the care of CAMHS
3. Currently under the care of community mental health services (CAMHS / EI / CMHT/)
4. Accepted referral to an ACD facilitator for ACD creation; including participants who decline to complete and ACD after referral to an ACD facilitator.

Older adults

1. Experienced detention under the MHA while under services for Older Adults
2. Currently under the care of older adult community mental health services
3. accepted referral to an ACD facilitator for ACD creation

General Adult:

1. Aged ≥ 18 years
2. Previously detained under the MHA
3. Under the care of community mental health services (CMHT or EI)

Forensic

1. Aged ≥ 18 years
2. Experience detention under the MHA into forensic services
3. Currently under the care of forensic mental health services

Carers: relative or friend of someone referred to an ACD facilitator

Professionals: SLaM staff involved in the care of a participant with an ACD whose ACD is expected to have been consulted because they were: involved in a transfer of care, placed in zoning, referred for a MHA assessment or to a home treatment team, attended an Emergency Department or Place of Safety, admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit or imprisoned.

The interviews conducted with service users and staff after the expected use event will also include questions about satisfaction with and perceived value of the process of completing, distributing, accessing, honouring, and reviewing an ACD.

Exclusion Criteria

Service users Aged under 16 years Lacking capacity to provide consent and/or is unwilling to do so Currently detained under the MHA in psychiatric hospital Currently under the care of eating disorder services

Carers/informal supporters Aged under 16 years Is not a relative or friend of a service user who is eligible for the study

Professionals Is not a mental health professional or Section 12 (MHA) approved doctor Is not a professional involved in supporting the completion of ACDs Is not a General Practitioner or mental health lead caring for people with SMI discharged from secondary services.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

South London and Maudsley/Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience-King's College London

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2946

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R&D2025/062

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id