EFFECTS OF LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY ON SPASTICITY AND GAIT PARAMETERS IN CHRONIC STROKE PATIENTS WITH SPASTIC PLANTAR FLEXORS
NCT ID: NCT07273591
Last Updated: 2025-12-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-30
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to explore the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on spasticity and walking ability in patients who have had a stroke for more than six months (chronic stroke). LLLT is a non-invasive, painless treatment that uses low-intensity light to stimulate tissue healing, reduce muscle tightness, and improve nerve function.
A total of 18 chronic stroke patients with spastic plantar flexors were included in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Study group: Received low-level laser therapy along with conventional physiotherapy.
Control group: Received conventional physiotherapy alone. Each patient received therapy for three weeks. The study evaluated outcomes using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for muscle spasticity, the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) for walking quality, and a Goniometer for ankle joint range of motion. Assessments were done before and after treatment.
The results showed that both groups improved significantly, but patients who received laser therapy demonstrated greater reduction in spasticity and better gait performance compared to those who received conventional therapy alone.
This study suggests that low-level laser therapy can be a useful addition to conventional rehabilitation programs for improving walking ability and reducing spasticity in stroke patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After a stroke, damage to the brain can cause increased muscle tone (spasticity), reduced mobility, and altered gait patterns. These issues significantly affect independence and quality of life. Traditional physiotherapy techniques, such as stretching and strengthening, are helpful but often insufficient in chronic cases. Recent evidence suggests that low-level laser therapy (LLLT) can promote cellular recovery, improve blood circulation, and reduce muscle stiffness by enhancing nerve conduction and reducing inflammation.
Study Objective:
To determine the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in improving spasticity and gait parameters in chronic stroke patients with spastic plantar flexors.
Study Design:
This was a randomized controlled trial conducted on 18 participants diagnosed with chronic stroke and presenting with spasticity of the ankle plantar flexors. Participants were divided into:
Study group (n=9): Received low-level laser therapy (parameters: wavelength 830 nm, power output 50 mW, energy density 6 J/cm²) combined with conventional physiotherapy.
Control group (n=9): Received conventional physiotherapy only (stretching, strengthening, and gait training).
Intervention Duration:
Both groups received treatment sessions five times a week for three weeks.
Outcome Measures:
Spasticity: Measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Gait Parameters: Measured using the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) Ankle Range of Motion (ROM): Measured with a Goniometer
Data Analysis:
Within-group changes were assessed using Friedman's test, and between-group comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.
Results Summary:
Both groups showed significant improvements in spasticity, ankle range of motion, and gait scores; however, the study group demonstrated greater gains in all parameters. The combination of LLLT with physiotherapy enhanced motor control, reduced stiffness, and improved walking quality more effectively than physiotherapy alone.
Conclusion:
Low-level laser therapy is a safe, effective, and non-invasive intervention that significantly improves spasticity and gait in chronic stroke patients. Incorporating LLLT into rehabilitation programs may help enhance mobility and functional independence.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conventional physical therapy
Participants in control group received conventional physical therapy for spasticity that was consisted of heating modality for 20 minutes followed by ten repetitions of sustained stretching of calf muscles (10 seconds hold), strengthening exercise for lower limb muscles i.e. calf muscles, hamstrings, and quadriceps, balance training on balance board and training of gait in parallel bars and using the stepper for six weeks and three sessions each week
conventional physical therapy
Participants in control group received conventional physical therapy for spasticity that was consisted of heating modality for 20 minutes followed by ten repetitions of sustained stretching of calf muscles (10 seconds hold), strengthening exercise for lower limb muscles i.e. calf muscles, hamstrings, and quadriceps, balance training on balance board and training of gait in parallel bars and using the stepper for six weeks and three sessions each week.
low level laser therapy
Patients were in prone position while we applied low level laser therapy in continues wave at a wavelength in the near infrared of 830nm. Power density was 670 mW/cm2. The treatment time per point was 30 seconds. Probe head was placed at 90 degree with light pressure on the calf muscles. Three consecutive treatments were given in a session, with 5 seconds break in between, giving a total irradiation time of 90 seconds. Three sessions were given per week for total of six weeks
Low Level Laser Therapy
Patients were in prone position while we applied low level laser therapy in continues wave at a wavelength in the near infrared of 830nm. Power density was 670 mW/cm2. The treatment time per point was 30 seconds. Probe head was placed at 90 degree with light pressure on the calf muscles. Three consecutive treatments were given in a session, with 5 seconds break in between, giving a total irradiation time of 90 seconds. Three sessions were given per week for total of six weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Low Level Laser Therapy
Patients were in prone position while we applied low level laser therapy in continues wave at a wavelength in the near infrared of 830nm. Power density was 670 mW/cm2. The treatment time per point was 30 seconds. Probe head was placed at 90 degree with light pressure on the calf muscles. Three consecutive treatments were given in a session, with 5 seconds break in between, giving a total irradiation time of 90 seconds. Three sessions were given per week for total of six weeks
conventional physical therapy
Participants in control group received conventional physical therapy for spasticity that was consisted of heating modality for 20 minutes followed by ten repetitions of sustained stretching of calf muscles (10 seconds hold), strengthening exercise for lower limb muscles i.e. calf muscles, hamstrings, and quadriceps, balance training on balance board and training of gait in parallel bars and using the stepper for six weeks and three sessions each week.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
The patients with active contamination and presence of rashes at the site of utilization of the laser application. A neoplastic lesion at the site of application.
45 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Montiha Azeem
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Montiha Azeem
Montiha Azeem
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Montiha Azeem, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Lahore, Lahore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shalamar Hospital, Sughra Shafi Medical Complex, Narowal
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Montiha Azeem, MSPT
Role: primary
Montiha, DPT
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC-UOL-/544-08/24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id