The Effect of Denosumab on Muscle and Strength and Insulin Sensitivity

NCT ID: NCT07271771

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-21

Study Completion Date

2027-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized, placebo controlled prospective trial evaluating the effect of denosumab on insulin sensitivity and muscle strength.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Denosumab is an antibody against receptor-activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) that prevents recruitment and differentiation of mature osteoclasts. Treatment with denosumab markedly decreases bone resorption, increases bone mineral density (BMD), and reduces the risk of vertebral as well as non-vertebral and hip fractures. Osteoclasts produce dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) that degrades glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-1 stimulates insulin production. In accordance with this, animal models have shown a beneficial effect of denosumab on glucose metabolism. However, data from clinical studies in patients with osteoporosis are limited and the results inconsistent. In a small, randomised trial with 52 healthy postmenopausal women, treatment with denosumab for 12 months reduced DPP-4 and increased GLP-1 compared to placebo but no effect was seen on insulin or fasting glucose levels. In the same publication, the authors conducted a non-randomized, observational study in osteoporotic patients with diabetes mellitus or prediabetes that were treated with either denosumab, bisphosphonates, or calcium + vitamin D at the discretion of their physician. Here, treatment with denosumab significantly reduced fasting glucose after 6 months and HbA1c after 12 months compared to bisphosphonates or calcium + vitamin D. Similar findings were seen in another observational study with 20 patients with diabetes. On the other hand, a post hoc analysis of the FREEDOM trial did not find a general effect of denosumab on fasting glucose in postmenopausal women with self-reported diabetes or prediabetes, but only reported a small decrease in fasting glucose in denosumab treated women with diabetes not treated with antidiabetics. This is in line with three small observational studies, in which no clinically relevant effect of denosumab on fasting glucose, insulin level or homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was identified.

Overall, the heterogeneity across the studies is large, most of the trials are observational studies and the results are inconsistent. Therefore, randomized, controlled trials are warranted to further elucidate this.

Denosumab has also been shown to improve muscle strength compared to placebo in animal models, however, data from human studies is limited. In an observational study, denosumab decreased the risk of falls and improved sarcopenia measures in 135 patients with osteoporosis compared to 272 patients treated with alendronate or zoledronate assessed at treatment initiation and after 5 years for denosumab and alendronate and 3 years for zoledronate. All outcome measures worsened one years after denosumab discontinuation. In another prospective observational study with 18 postmenopausal women, denosumab treatment for an average of three years improved appendicular lean mass and handgrip strength compared to treatment with bisphosphates or placebo. This is in line with two additional observational studies, in which denosumab improved muscle strength after 6 - 17 months compared to bisphosphonates or vitamin D.

None of the studies evaluating the effect of denosumab on muscle strength are randomised controlled trials, the outcome measures are different and the follow up visits few. Also, none of the studies controlled for exercise.

The investigators therefore want to conduct a randomized, placebo controlled prospective trial evaluating the effect of denosumab on insulin sensitivity and muscle strength.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study is a randomized double-blind, interventional study in 40 postmenopausal with diabetes mellitus type 2. The patients will be randomized at baseline to denosumab 60 mg (n=20) or placebo (n=20), which will administrated at base-line and month 6.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study group 1

Denosumab

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Denosumab 60 mg

Study group 2

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline (0.9% NaCl)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Denosumab

Denosumab 60 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline (0.9% NaCl)

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Postmenopausal women (postmenopausal for at least two years)
* Age ≥ 40 years
* BMD T-score ≥ -2.0 (lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck)
* At least 2 lumbar vertebrae that can be evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
* Diabetes Mellitus type 2
* Treatment with metformin as monotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment for osteoporosis at any time
* Other antidiabetic medication than metformin
* Low-energy vertebral fractures at any time
* Low-energy hip fracture at any time
* Ongoing treatment with systemic glucocorticoids
* Metabolic bone disease (for example osteogenesis imperfecta, Paget's disease of bone, hyperparathyroidism)
* Treatment affecting bone, calcium metabolism or muscle
* Active cancer within the last 5 years with the exception of basal cell skin cancer
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 35 mL/min
* Unable to read and understand Danish
* Immobility
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sponsor: MD, Professor, DMSc, PhD Bente Lomholt Langdahl

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aarhus University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anne Sophie Sølling

MD, PhD, postdoc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bente Langdahl, MD, Professor, DMSc, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aarhus University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Anne Sophie Sølling, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+45 22 30 05 24

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Anne Sophie Sølling, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+45 22 30 05 24

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anastasilakis AD, Papapoulos SE, Polyzos SA, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Makras P. Zoledronate for the Prevention of Bone Loss in Women Discontinuing Denosumab Treatment. A Prospective 2-Year Clinical Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Dec;34(12):2220-2228. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3853. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31433518 (View on PubMed)

Miller PD, Bolognese MA, Lewiecki EM, McClung MR, Ding B, Austin M, Liu Y, San Martin J. Effect of denosumab on bone density and turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass after long-term continued, discontinued, and restarting of therapy: a randomized blinded phase 2 clinical trial. Bone. 2008 Aug;43(2):222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18539106 (View on PubMed)

Rupp T, von Vopelius E, Strahl A, Oheim R, Barvencik F, Amling M, Rolvien T. Beneficial effects of denosumab on muscle performance in patients with low BMD: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2177-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06470-3. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35751664 (View on PubMed)

Phu S, Bani Hassan E, Vogrin S, Kirk B, Duque G. Effect of Denosumab on Falls, Muscle Strength, and Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Dec;67(12):2660-2661. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16165. Epub 2019 Sep 4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31483858 (View on PubMed)

Miedany YE, Gaafary ME, Toth M, Hegazi MO, Aroussy NE, Hassan W, Almedany S, Nasr A, Bahlas S, Galal S; Egyptian Academy of Bone Health, Metabolic Bone Diseases. Is there a potential dual effect of denosumab for treatment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia? Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;40(10):4225-4232. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05757-w. Epub 2021 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34008069 (View on PubMed)

Rossini A, Frigerio S, Dozio E, Trevisan R, Perseghin G, Corbetta S. Effect of Denosumab on Glucose Homeostasis in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors: A Pilot Study. Int J Endocrinol. 2020 Nov 6;2020:1809150. doi: 10.1155/2020/1809150. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33204260 (View on PubMed)

Lasco A, Morabito N, Basile G, Atteritano M, Gaudio A, Giorgianni GM, Morini E, Faraci B, Bellone F, Catalano A. Denosumab Inhibition of RANKL and Insulin Resistance in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016 Feb;98(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0075-5. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26498169 (View on PubMed)

Passeri E, Benedini S, Costa E, Corbetta S. A Single 60 mg Dose of Denosumab Might Improve Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Nondiabetic Severe Osteoporotic Women. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:352858. doi: 10.1155/2015/352858. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25873952 (View on PubMed)

Napoli N, Pannacciulli N, Vittinghoff E, Crittenden D, Yun J, Wang A, Wagman R, Schwartz AV. Effect of denosumab on fasting glucose in women with diabetes or prediabetes from the FREEDOM trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018 May;34(4):e2991. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2991. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29430796 (View on PubMed)

Abe I, Ochi K, Takashi Y, Yamao Y, Ohishi H, Fujii H, Minezaki M, Sugimoto K, Kudo T, Abe M, Ohnishi Y, Mukoubara S, Kobayashi K. Effect of denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), upon glycemic and metabolic parameters: Effect of denosumab on glycemic parameters. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(47):e18067. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018067.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31764838 (View on PubMed)

Bonnet N, Bourgoin L, Biver E, Douni E, Ferrari S. RANKL inhibition improves muscle strength and insulin sensitivity and restores bone mass. J Clin Invest. 2019 May 23;129(8):3214-3223. doi: 10.1172/JCI125915.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31120440 (View on PubMed)

Weivoda MM, Chew CK, Monroe DG, Farr JN, Atkinson EJ, Geske JR, Eckhardt B, Thicke B, Ruan M, Tweed AJ, McCready LK, Rizza RA, Matveyenko A, Kassem M, Andersen TL, Vella A, Drake MT, Clarke BL, Oursler MJ, Khosla S. Identification of osteoclast-osteoblast coupling factors in humans reveals links between bone and energy metabolism. Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 7;11(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14003-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31911667 (View on PubMed)

Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, Czerwinski E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler DL, Lippuner K, Reginster JY, Roux C, Malouf J, Bradley MN, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Dakin P, Pannacciulli N, Dempster DW, Papapoulos S. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;5(7):513-523. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9. Epub 2017 May 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28546097 (View on PubMed)

Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19671655 (View on PubMed)

Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Kostenuik PJ, Dougall WC, Sullivan JK, San Martin J, Dansey R. Bench to bedside: elucidation of the OPG-RANK-RANKL pathway and the development of denosumab. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 May;11(5):401-19. doi: 10.1038/nrd3705.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22543469 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTIS: 2024-510637-18-00

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CTIS: 2024-510637-18-00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Muscle Impact of Treating Osteoporosis
NCT05666310 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4
Denosumab China Phase III Study
NCT02014467 COMPLETED PHASE3
Osteoclast Inhibition and Bone Formation
NCT02554695 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1