PET Assessment of Disease Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in ANCA-associated Vasculitis
NCT ID: NCT07258524
Last Updated: 2025-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-01-31
2029-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Total-Body PET imaging with FDG, DOTATATE, and FAPI radiotracers may provide the answer. This study will recruit patients with active AAV, together with a control group of individuals without the disease, to undergo Total-Body FDG, DOTATATE, and FAPI PET scanning and compare the results with established measures of disease activity and CVD risk assessment.
The investigators believe that Total-Body PET scanning will be capable of accurately identifying AAV disease and those at increased CVD risk. This could enhance understanding and improve the management of those with the condition.
This study will recruit a group of patients with AAV and a comparator groups of 'matched' individuals without AAV. Comparisons between groups will allow the investigators to ensure that the changes seen are due to AAV disease. The study will recruit a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 90 participants in the AAV group, and a minimum of 10 and maximum of 30 participants in the matched control group.
AAV subjects and matched control subjects will undergo baseline total-body PET scanning with either one, two or three radiotracers (\[18F\]-FDG, \[68Ga\]-DOTATATE, and \[68Ga\]-FAPI). Alongside this they will receive assessment of cardiovascular disease risk including 24-hour blood pressure measurement, arterial stiffness measurement, and retinal scanning. Participants will also supply a blood and urine sample.
For matched control subjects, their participation will end at this point. Subjects in the AAV group will undergo repeat assessment with total-body PET imaging and cardiovascular disease risk measurement once their condition is in remission (usually after around 3-6 months).
The investigators will compare PET scan results between groups, and with cardiovascular assessments. This will allow determination of whether total-body PET scanning can identify AAV disease activity, and whether it can inform CVD risk.
All research activity will be carried out within the University of Edinburgh BioQuarter, including the Royal infirmary of Edinburgh, the Edinburgh Imaging Facility, and Queen's Medical Research Institute.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The diagnosis of AAV is challenging and often delayed, meaning established organ damage is often present at diagnosis. Accurate assessment of disease activity is essential to guide best treatment in AAV. Smouldering, unchecked inflammation contributes to morbidity and to the development of CVD. Conversely, attributing symptoms to active disease when they are due to established injury risks overtreatment and associated side effects, which can be significant.
Current methods of disease activity assessment are limited. Biopsy is considered the gold standard, however, can only assess disease in one organ at a time, and is an invasive and unpleasant test. Several scans are currently available, though each is also limited in terms of coverage and accuracy. Accordingly, new methods of disease activity assessment are required which provide an accurate, non-invasive, and multi-system approach, both at presentation and throughout the disease course.
Additionally, even when disease control is optimum, patients with AAV remain at an increased risk of CVD. Methods to identify those at the highest risk of CVD events are lacking, thus personalising preventative therapies remains a challenge. Tools that can highlight those at an increased risk of CVD events are urgently needed.
Total-Body positron emission tomography (PET) scanning provides a potential solution to both of these problems.
PET scanning allows detection and quantification of disease within the body. With the advent of Total-Body PET facilities, scans now benefit from enhanced coverage, accuracy, and speed. Patients can now be reliably scanned from 'top to toe' relatively quickly, and with an acceptable degree of radiation exposure. Despite being used in several similar conditions, PET has never been adequately assessed in AAV.
PET scanning requires the injection of a 'radiotracer' which binds to areas of disease and can then be picked up by the scanner. Historically, we have used a radiotracer called FDG, however a number of newer radiotracers are now available which may be more accurate. The radiotracer DOTATATE may bind more specifically to the inflammation caused by AAV, allowing a more accurate picture of the disease to be painted. Additionally, the radiotracer FAPI finds to areas of fibrosis, or scarring. this radiotracer therefore has the potential to tell us about a different aspect of the disease, and help differentiate active inflammation from tissue damage and remodelling.
Finally, in addition to identifying active AAV disease, both FDG and DOTATATE may be able to inform which patients are more at risk of developing CVD in the future.
Accordingly, this study aims to assess the ability of Total-Body PET scanning, using three different radiotracers, to accurately assess disease activity in AAV, and identify those patients at an increased risk of CVD in the long term. This would improve outcomes for these patients, and increase understanding of the condition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) group
All participants will have a diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) in accordance with the 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides criteria and clinician's assessment. At enrolment, participants in the AAV group will have active disease, as defined by the presence of symptoms and signs attributable to active vasculitis necessitating the commencement or increase in immunosuppressive treatment other than glucocorticoids.
In order to return for the follow-up visit, participants will be in clinical remission. Remission will be defined as Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) = 0 for at least two months whilst taking prednisolone at a daily of dose ≤7.5mg in conjunction with the treating clinician's assessment of clinically silent disease.
No interventions assigned to this group
Matched control group
All participants will be matched with the AAV group based on age, gender, ethnicity, and cardiovascular disease risk factors including impaired kidney function. They will have no additional health problems and be taking no additional medications (other than those relevant to cardiovascular disease risk) that may interfere with PET imaging.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of active AAV (AAV group)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
3. Advanced renal dysfunction (eGFR \<15ml/min/1.73m2)
4. Adverse reaction or hypersensitivity to proposed radiotracers
5. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
6. Patients without mental capacity or willingness to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neeraj Dhaun, MBChB PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Edinburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AC25078
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id