Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT ID: NCT07248709
Last Updated: 2025-12-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-05
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A double-blinded randomized clinical trial will be conducted for ten months at Ruhama Welfare Foundation Society Lahore and Kainat Patient Care and Old Age Home, Lahore. The sample size is calculated through G-power and 68 participants will be recruited through the non-probability convenience sampling technique. Those who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized into two groups through the online randomizer tool. Both experimental groups will undergo an 8-week intervention, consisting of three sessions per week with alternate-day training of 38 minutes. The HIIT group will perform exercise with each session consisting of four 4-minute intervals at 85-95% of their maximum heart rate, with 3-minute active recovery periods, while the MICT group will engage in continuous exercise for 28 minutes at 70-75% of their maximum heart rate. Assessment will be done at baseline, after the 4th week, 8th week, and follow-up at 12th week.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
HIIT can enhance cognitive performance through increased blood flow to the brain, promoting neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity, which are crucial for cognitive tasks. MICT also supports cognitive function. HIIT often produces superior results in a shorter time frame. HIIT involves short bursts of high-intensity exercise followed by rest or low-intensity periods, leading to significant cardiovascular adaptations such as increased VO2 max and improved heart efficiency. MICT, while beneficial, requires longer durations to achieve comparable gains in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Engaging in regular physical exercise has been shown to delay age-related physiological and cognitive decline, reduce the risk of common diseases, and improve the subjective quality of life. Meanwhile, a large proportion of older adults are insufficiently physically active, potentially increasing societal health-related challenges connected to a growing older population. It is, therefore, important to provide both effective and attractive exercise methods adapted for this group. One of the proposed key factors in maximizing exercise effects is to exercise beyond moderate intensities, as in high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Although aerobic moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) is performed at intensities below the anaerobic threshold, HIIT is broadly defined as short, repeated work intervals at an external intensity close to (80%-100%), or above (\>100%) the intensity that elicits maximum oxygen uptake (Vo2 max), with passive or low intensity recovery between intervals.
While exercise is a promising intervention for cognitive health, the comparative efficacy of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) in older adults with MCI remains underexplored. This research seeks to provide useful insights examining the effects of HIIT and MICT on executive functions, cardiorespiratory fitness, and overall physical fitness. HIIT's potential time efficiency and physiological benefits may offer significant advantages over traditional exercise methods. The findings could inform clinical practice, shape public health guidelines, and lead to more effective exercise interventions, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for older adults at risk of cognitive decline.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
The High-Intensity Interval Training Group (HIIT)
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
The HIIT group will engage in 28 min of alternating high-intensity and low-intensity exercise, where the high-intensity phase will be at 85-90% of maximum heart rate for 4 min, followed by a 3-min recovery period at 50-60% of maximum heart rate, repeated four times on a treadmill or stationary bicycle. (RPE \~16 on Borg scale) Total duration will be 38 minutes including warm up and cool down period.
Group B
Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT)
Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training
The MICT group's training will consist of continuous aerobic exercise for 28 min at 60-70% of maximum heart rate on a treadmill or stationary bicycle. (RPE \~13 on Borg scale) Total duration will be 38 minutes including warm up and cool down period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
The HIIT group will engage in 28 min of alternating high-intensity and low-intensity exercise, where the high-intensity phase will be at 85-90% of maximum heart rate for 4 min, followed by a 3-min recovery period at 50-60% of maximum heart rate, repeated four times on a treadmill or stationary bicycle. (RPE \~16 on Borg scale) Total duration will be 38 minutes including warm up and cool down period.
Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training
The MICT group's training will consist of continuous aerobic exercise for 28 min at 60-70% of maximum heart rate on a treadmill or stationary bicycle. (RPE \~13 on Borg scale) Total duration will be 38 minutes including warm up and cool down period.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* older adults who are physically normal (the six-item Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale should all be evaluated as "independent")
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to walk without an assistive device
* Diagnosed with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease
* Having regular exercise habits (defined as exercise for ≥150 min per week).
* Participating in other ongoing intervention study
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aruba Saeed, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Khursheed Oldage Home and Nursing Care
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Ruhama Welfare Foundation Society
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Sadia Khalid, MSPT-NM
Role: primary
Sadia Khalid, MSPT-NM
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shao Z, Huang J, Feng H, Hu M. Optimizing the physical activity intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a factorial randomized trial. Front Sports Act Living. 2024 May 7;6:1383325. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1383325. eCollection 2024.
de Lima NS, De Sousa RAL, Amorim FT, Gripp F, Diniz E Magalhaes CO, Henrique Pinto S, Peixoto MFD, Monteiro-Junior RS, Bourbeau K, Cassilhas RC. Moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training improve cognition, and BDNF levels of middle-aged overweight men. Metab Brain Dis. 2022 Feb;37(2):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s11011-021-00859-5. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
Tsai CL, Pai MC, Ukropec J, Ukropcova B. The Role of Physical Fitness in the Neurocognitive Performance of Task Switching in Older Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Apr 23;53(1):143-59. doi: 10.3233/JAD-151093.
Martin-Smith R, Cox A, Buchan DS, Baker JS, Grace F, Sculthorpe N. High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CRF) in Healthy, Overweight and Obese Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8):2955. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082955.
Wu Q, Niu X, Zhang Y, Song J, Chi A. A Comparative Study of Inhibition Function between High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Healthy People: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 6;20(4):2859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042859.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/0268 Sadia Khalid
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id