Diagnostic Stewardship Intervention to Reduce Inappropriate Antibiotic Use for Urinary Tract Infections in Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT07246837
Last Updated: 2025-12-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
252 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-15
2028-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does providing patients with a bilingual educational intervention reduce urine culture contamination rates?
2. Does the intervention lead to fewer unnecessary urinary antibiotic prescriptions?
3. Does providing patients with a bilingual educational intervention reduce contaminated urinalyses? Researchers will compare patients randomized to receive the educational intervention (video and flyer) to those receiving usual care to see if the intervention improves urine collection accuracy and reduces inappropriate antibiotic use. Participants will watch a short, animated video with step-by-step instructions for proper midstream clean-catch urine (MSCC) collection, receive a pictorial flyer (with stills from the video) reinforcing the instructions, and provide a urine sample for culture. Hypothesis: patients who receive the educational intervention will have: lower urine culture contamination rates (primary outcome), fewer urinary antibiotic prescriptions (secondary outcome), and fewer contaminated urinalyses (secondary outcome). The objectives are to (1) develop educational tools: Create an animated video and pictorial flyer with step-by-step urine collection instructions for women and men, developed through an iterative, stakeholder-engaged process, (2) assess acceptability: Use mixed methods (quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews) to evaluate and refine the tools for usability and cultural/linguistic appropriateness, and (3) test effectiveness: Conduct a randomized controlled trial to assess the intervention's impact on urine contamination rates, antibiotic prescribing, and patient satisfaction.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Significance: This study addresses Goal 3 of the National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and CDC priorities by improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing inappropriate antibiotic use. Our approach empowers frontline staff and targets a neglected area of outpatient diagnostic stewardship. Urine culture contamination is common, wasteful, and harmful, particularly for pregnant patients who are routinely screened for bacteriuria. Contamination obscures true infection or leads to overtreatment, increasing risks for antimicrobial resistance, adverse drug reactions, and healthcare costs. Our intervention will improve patient care and reduce waste of laboratory resources.
Innovation and Impact: The proposed research is innovative because it places nurses and medical assistants at the forefront of antimicrobial stewardship in primary care. The investigators will develop a bilingual, multicultural educational intervention that includes an animated instructional video and a pictorial flyer. These materials will provide step-by-step guidance for proper MSCC urine collection and will be designed with input from patients, nurses, and medical assistants to ensure cultural competence and clarity for individuals with low literacy. This approach represents a departure from previous interventions, which lacked stakeholder engagement and failed to reduce contamination rates effectively. By incorporating stakeholder feedback and using engaging visual formats, the investigators aim to create an intervention that is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for diverse patient populations.
Specific Aims: Aim 1: Iteratively develop a bilingual, multicultural educational intervention to reduce urine contamination, with stakeholder and expert input. The intervention will include an animated instructional video and a flyer with pictorial instructions that will provide step-by-step guidance to patients for collecting an MSCC urine sample. Aim 2: Perform a pilot study to assess and improve the intervention's acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility using mixed methods. The investigators will use a sequential explanatory design that includes a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews with stakeholders (patients, nurses, and medical assistants). Aim 3: Test the effectiveness of the intervention at reducing urine culture contamination via a randomized controlled trial. The investigators hypothesize that patients who are randomized to receive the intervention versus usual care will have lower culture contamination rates (primary outcome), fewer urinary antibiotic prescriptions (secondary outcome), and fewer contaminated urinalyses (secondary outcome). Investigators will also study intervention fidelity, usability, and patient satisfaction using mixed methods research.
Methodology: The study will be conducted in two safety-net and one private primary care clinics. The investigators will use a randomized controlled trial with parallel groups to compare the intervention to usual care. Eligible participants will be adults aged 18 years or older who are asked to provide a urine sample for culture or urinalysis. Patients with indwelling urinary catheters or those unable to view the video or read the flyer in English or Spanish will be excluded. Randomization will occur at the patient level using a secure electronic system managed through REDCap. Participants assigned to the intervention group will view the animated video and flyer in their preferred language before urine collection. Men will receive materials tailored for men, and women will receive materials tailored for women. Participants in the control group will receive usual care without additional education. The primary outcome is the proportion of contaminated urine cultures, defined as mixed flora, growth of non-uropathogens, or growth of three or more uropathogens. Secondary outcomes include antibiotic prescribing within seven days of urine culture results and contamination of urinalyses, defined as more than ten squamous epithelial cells per microscopic field. The investigators will also assess implementation results through exit interviews and surveys. The sample size for the trial is 252 patients (126 per arm). Data will be collected from electronic medical records, patient surveys, and qualitative interviews. All data will be securely stored and de-identified for analysis.
Next Steps/Implementation: If the intervention proves effective, future work will focus on disseminating the educational tools to other settings, such as emergency departments and long-term care facilities. This project will provide a scalable, resource-efficient approach to improving diagnostic accuracy, reducing unnecessary antibiotic use, and advancing antimicrobial stewardship in outpatient care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Participants receive standard clinical care without additional educational materials. Urine collection follows routine clinic procedures.
No interventions assigned to this group
MSCC Educational Tool
Participants receive a standardized educational tool prior to urine collection. This includes a short video and flyer in English or Spanish explaining proper midstream clean-catch technique. Materials are shown in the exam room before specimen collection.
MSCC Educational Tool
A brief educational intervention (video + flyer) designed to improve urine collection technique and reduce contamination. Delivered in the patient's preferred language (English or Spanish) immediately before urine collection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MSCC Educational Tool
A brief educational intervention (video + flyer) designed to improve urine collection technique and reduce contamination. Delivered in the patient's preferred language (English or Spanish) immediately before urine collection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide informed consent
* English- and or Spanish-speaking.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to read and sign the informed consent
* Unable to follow study procedures (due to significant visual, auditory, physical or cognitive impairment).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
LarisaGrigoryan
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Larissa Grigoryan, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Kiara Olmeda
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bekeris LG, Jones BA, Walsh MK, Wagar EA. Urine culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 127 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Jun;132(6):913-7. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-913-UCCACO.
Goebel MC, Trautner BW, Grigoryan L. The Five Ds of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship for Urinary Tract Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021 Dec 15;34(4):e0000320. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00003-20. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Reekie D. Ending the misery of child dental decay. Br Dent J. 1999 Aug 28;187(4):174-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800234.
Gupta K, Grigoryan L, Trautner B. Urinary Tract Infection. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):ITC49-ITC64. doi: 10.7326/AITC201710030.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-53559
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id