Comparison of Manual Acupuncture at Distal Acupoints Versus Electroacupuncture at Local Acupoints in Patients With Acute Neck Pain Due to Cervical Spondylosis

NCT ID: NCT07240623

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-25

Study Completion Date

2025-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial involving two groups: manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture, with 62 participants in each group. All participants received treatment once daily for 10 consecutive days, combined with at least 10 minutes of active cervical spine exercises per session.

Participants were allowed to take one 500 mg tablet of paracetamol if the pain exceeded their tolerance threshold, with a minimum interval of 6 hours between doses and a maximum daily dose of 1,500 mg. The number of tablets taken each day was recorded. No other analgesic interventions were permitted during the study period.

The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of the two interventions in improving pain intensity (VAS score) and limitations of cervical range of motion after each treatment session. In addition, adverse events were monitored and recorded after every intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Spondylosis Acute Neck Pain Neck Pain Musculoskeletal Degenerative Cervical Spine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Manual Acupuncture

Participants receive manual acupuncture at distal acupoints (SI3, SI5, TE4, BL60, BL62, GB40) on the contralateral side of the painful neck area for 25 minutes. During needle retention, patients perform active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual acupuncture at distal acupoints

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Manual acupuncture applied for 25 minutes at distal acupoints selected based on meridian diagnosis (SI3, SI5, TE4, BL60, BL62, GB40) on the contralateral side of the pain. During needle retention, participants performed active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Electroacupuncture

Participants receive electroacupuncture for 25 minutes at local acupoints (GB20-SI15 and GB21-LU7) on the painful side. After needle removal, patients perform active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Electroacupuncture at local acupoints

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electroacupuncture applied for 25 minutes at local acupoints (GB20-SI15 and GB21-LU7) on the painful side. After needle removal, participants performed active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manual acupuncture at distal acupoints

Manual acupuncture applied for 25 minutes at distal acupoints selected based on meridian diagnosis (SI3, SI5, TE4, BL60, BL62, GB40) on the contralateral side of the pain. During needle retention, participants performed active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electroacupuncture at local acupoints

Electroacupuncture applied for 25 minutes at local acupoints (GB20-SI15 and GB21-LU7) on the painful side. After needle removal, participants performed active cervical spine movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) for at least 10 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Manual acupuncture Distal acupoints Electroacupuncture Local acupoints

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Acute onset of neck pain lasting less than 6 weeks.
* Pain intensity ≥ 50 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
* Presence of limitation in at least one cervical range of motion (ROM).
* Radiographic diagnosis of cervical spondylosis based on Kellgren and Lawrence criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with infection, cachexia, or psychiatric disorders.
* Currently using analgesic medication.
* Cervical movement limitation persisting for more than 6 weeks.
* History of or indication for cervical spine surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

School of Medicine - Vietnam National University at Ho Chi Minh city

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nguyen Ky Xuan Nhi

Medical Specialist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Traditional Medicine Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City

Ho Chi Minh City, Xuan Hoa Ward, Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB No. IRB-VN01002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

3836/QĐ-ĐHYD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.