Bempedoic Acid Versus Statins in Primary-Prevention Patients With Suboptimal Statin Adherence: Effects on LDL-C Reduction and Tolerability
NCT ID: NCT07239414
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE3
690 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-11-10
2027-02-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
MDPI
+1
In patients with hypercholesterolemia who are unable to tolerate statins, or have sub-optimal statin adherence/tolerance, bempedoic acid has been shown to reduce LDL-C by \~20-30% (monotherapy) and more when added to other therapies (e.g., ezetimibe) (≈30-40%).
PubMed
* 2 medicinejournal.in
* 2
In the large primary-prevention subgroup of the trial CLEAR Outcomes (statin-intolerant patients without prior cardiovascular event), bempedoic acid (180 mg daily) lowered LDL-C by \~21.3% and hs-CRP by \~21.5%. It also was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): hazard ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.89) versus placebo over \~40 months.
PubMed +1
Regarding tolerability: muscle-related adverse events appear lower compared to statins (because bempedoic acid is activated only in the liver, not in skeletal muscle) and it appears generally well tolerated, but there are signals of increased uric acid/gout, elevated hepatic enzymes, and creatinine/renal effects.
MDPI
+1
Comparative cardiovascular benefit (when normalized per unit LDL-C reduction) suggests that bempedoic acid may yield similar relative risk reductions as statins, though absolute LDL-C lowering is less.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating Bioequivalence of a Fixed Dose Combination Versus Tablets of Bempedoic Acid / Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin
NCT07201545
Drug Interaction Statin
NCT02089061
Dual vs Triple Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Elevated LDL Cholesterol
NCT07255820
Comparative Study Between Antihyperlipidemic Agents in Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases
NCT07313124
A Phase I, Open-label, Crossover Study Comparing the Relative Bioavailability of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Laroprovstat/Rosuvastatin vs Their Single Therapy Products in Healthy Adults
NCT07316608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Frontiers
Indication/Use Case: Particularly useful in patients who (a) are at elevated cardiovascular risk (primary prevention or secondary), (b) cannot tolerate statins or have suboptimal adherence, and (c) need further LDL-C reduction beyond statin (or in place of statin) therapy.
Efficacy:
\~20-30% LDL-C lowering as monotherapy in statin-intolerant patients. PubMed
+1
Additional benefit when combined with other therapies (e.g., \~30-40% reduction when combined with ezetimibe).
medicinejournal.in
In primary-prevention high-risk patients intolerant of statins: LDL-C reduction \~21% and hs-CRP \~21% with meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events.
PubMed +1
Tolerability/Safety:
Lower risk of muscle symptoms compared to statins. PubMed
+1
Known adverse signals: hyperuricemia/gout, elevated liver enzymes, possibly increased creatinine/renal changes.
JAMA Network +1
Comparison with Statins:
Statins typically reduce LDL-C by much larger margins (30-50%+ depending on dose/intensity). Bempedoic acid's LDL-C reduction is more modest in comparison.
However, when looking at the risk reduction per unit LDL-C lowering, bempedoic acid appears to yield similar relative benefits as statins.
American College of Cardiology
+1
Clinical Implication: In patients with suboptimal statin use (due to intolerance, non-adherence, or contraindication), bempedoic acid offers a viable adjunct or alternative lipid-lowering strategy in the primary prevention setting.
Limitations:
Not a direct head-to-head trial of bempedoic acid versus statins in the scenario of suboptimal statin adherence.
Absolute reduction in LDL-C is lower than high-intensity statins, so expectations must be calibrated accordingly.
Long-term safety in wider populations continues to be monitored.
Cost and accessibility may vary by region; local cost-effectiveness needs evaluation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A (Bempedoic acid)
BA 180 mg once daily + placebo statin.
Bempedoic Acid 180 MG Oral Tablet
BA 180mg OD
Placebo
Placebo given OD
Arm B (Statin)
Rosuvastatin 5 mg once daily + placebo BA.
Rosuvastatin 5 mg
rosuvastatin 5mg HS
Placebo
Placebo given OD
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bempedoic Acid 180 MG Oral Tablet
BA 180mg OD
Rosuvastatin 5 mg
rosuvastatin 5mg HS
Placebo
Placebo given OD
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indicated for lipid-lowering therapy (LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL or 10-year ASCVD risk
≥7.5%).
* Documented history of poor statin adherence, defined as:
* Self-reported adherence \<80% in the past 3 months, or
* Prior statin discontinuation for adverse effects documented in the medical record.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe hepatic impairment (ALT or AST \>3× upper limit of normal).
* Severe renal impairment (eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m²).
* Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or women of childbearing potential not using contraception.
* Current or planned treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors, fibrates, or niacin.
* Known hypersensitivity to study drugs or excipients.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohaib Ashraf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sohaib Ashraf
Consultant Cardiologist
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RAIC PESSI/ESTT/2025/506
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.