Risks and Benefits of Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CEAP C3-C6) in Patients Aged 80 and Over

NCT ID: NCT07233616

Last Updated: 2025-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prevalence of severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is significant in the growing octogenarian population. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard minimally invasive treatment, robust data on its outcomes and safety profiles specifically in patients aged 80 years and older remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the risks and benefits of RFA in this specific, high-risk demographic.This prospective, single-arm, single-center cohort study will enroll 50 patients (initial target sample size) aged ≥80 years with CVI classified as CEAP C3 to C6 and with confirmed great or small saphenous vein reflux. All participants will undergo endovenous RFA under tumescent local anesthesia. The primary outcomes are: 1) the great/small saphenous vein occlusion rate at 6 months, assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and 2) the change in disease-specific quality of life from baseline to 6 months, measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ). Secondary outcomes include occlusion rates at 1 and 3 months; complication rates (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, skin burns, paresthesia) within 30 days; and changes in the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at predefined intervals over 6 months.This study is designed to demonstrate a high technical success rate (occlusion rate \>95% at 6 months) and a statistically significant improvement in AVVQ and VCSS scores at 6 months post-procedure. The collected data will provide a detailed profile of complication rates, characterizing the safety of RFA in this very elderly cohort.This study will provide crucial, prospective evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of RFA for treating CVI in octogenarians. The findings are expected to guide clinical decision-making and inform treatment guidelines for this vulnerable and expanding patient population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI Radiofrequency Ablation Octogenarians(Aged 80 and Over) Cohort Study

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation

All patients undergo endovenous radiofrequency ablation(RFA) under local tumescent anesthesia. Using the ClosureFast™ system (or equivalent), the target saphenous vein is accessed percutaneously under ultrasound guidance. After catheter placement and tumescent anesthesia infiltration, radiofrequency energy is delivered segmentally to ablate the vein. Post-procedure, compression bandaging is applied and Class II compression stockings are prescribed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: Aged 80 years or older.
2. Clinical Diagnosis: Symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremity, with the highest clinical class (CEAP classification) being one of the following:

* C3: Venous edema
* C4a: Pigmentation or eczema
* C4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche
* C5: Healed venous ulcer
* C6: Active venous ulcer
3. Confirmed Reflux: Color duplex ultrasound examination confirming reflux (reflux time \> 0.5 seconds) in the great saphenous vein (GSV) and/or small saphenous vein (SSV) of the target limb.
4. Informed Consent: The patient or their legally authorized representative is able to understand and voluntarily provides written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

1. Mobility: Non-ambulatory or bedridden.
2. Thrombosis: Presence of acute superficial thrombophlebitis of the target vein, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the target limb.
3. Arterial Disease: Significant peripheral arterial disease, defined as an ankle-brachial index (ABI) \< 0.8 in the target limb.
4. Coagulopathy: Uncorrectable coagulation disorder.
5. Allergy: Known severe allergy to local anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine) or relevant device materials.
6. Cognition \& Compliance: Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric illness that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes adequate understanding and cooperation for the study procedures and follow-up.
7. Life Expectancy: Life expectancy of less than 1 year due to other comorbid conditions (e.g., terminal malignancy).
8. General Unsuitability: Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chunshui He

chief physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chunshui He Doctor

Role: CONTACT

18981885601

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chunshui He Doctor

Role: primary

18981885601

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kulkarni SR, Slim FJ, Emerson LG, Davies C, Bulbulia RA, Whyman MR, Poskitt KR. Effect of foam sclerotherapy on healing and long-term recurrence in chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology. 2013 Apr;28(3):140-6. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2011.011118.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22422794 (View on PubMed)

Williamsson C, Danielsson P, Smith L. Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy for chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology. 2014 Dec;29(10):688-93. doi: 10.1177/0268355513505506. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24072751 (View on PubMed)

Mohamed AH, Howitt A, Rae S, Cai PL, Hitchman L, Wallace T, Nandhra S, Pymer S, Knighton A, Smith G, Chetter IC, Carradice D. Ten-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of endothermal ablation versus conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8):znae195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae195.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 39162334 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ChengduUTCM 121

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.