Evaluating the Status of Complex Aneuploidy to Locate Additional Transferrable Embryos

NCT ID: NCT07227116

Last Updated: 2025-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

280 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the reproductive potential of embryos classified as "complex aneuploid" (involving three or more abnormal chromosomes) or "chaotic" (six or more abnormal chromosomes) through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Specifically, we seek to determine whether embryos initially reported as having multiple chromosomal abnormalities might still have the potential for normal chromosomal composition, the opportunity for transfer, and ultimately, the potential to achieve a live birth through re-biopsy and reanalysis.

Key Information:

This portion of the study seeks your consent for the re-biopsy and genetic reanalysis of the embryos only. It does not yet include consent for potential future transfer.

Participation remains completely voluntary, and your decision will not affect your current or future care.

We deeply appreciate your support and commitment to advancing fertility research.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recently, the term "chaotic" has come into the PGT-A reporting lexicon, defined (perhaps arbitrarily) as 6 or more aneuploidies detected. Complex aneuploidy refers to embryos with multiple chromosomal aneuploidies. In one large study, complex aneuploidy at the cleavage stage was found in 41% of embryos overall, 29% of embryos in women 27-37 years old, and 45% of embryos in women 38-45 years old. By the blastocyst stage, only 10% of all embryos were complex aneuploid, with 13.7% of embryos in women aged 38-47 years compared to 4.5% in women aged 27-37 years demonstrating complex aneuploidy. Multiple aneuploidies were also detected in a retrospective study of 1502 spontaneous abortions, with 4.6% of cases showing double aneuploidy and only 0.4% showing 3 or more aneuploidies (2).

The high rate of complex aneuploidy in cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos even among young patients suggests multiple mitotic errors in the first few cell divisions, which would likely lead to developmental arrest (2). Therefore, if transferred, such embryos would be expected not to implant or to miscarry. Historically, embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities have therefore been de-selected for transfer or even discarded. However, recently Lin et al. reported a healthy live birth following chaotic embryo transfer (3), calling into question the assumed non-viability of chaotic embryos. Might some of these embryos correct multiple aneuploidies and become euploid? It is plausible that any euploid population of cells could have a higher survival rate and a higher mitotic rate, and if abnormal cells undergo apoptosis, a euploid embryo could result. This could explain the low rate of complex aneuploidy seen in miscarriages. An additional explanation is that imperfections in the biopsy, amplification, and/or NGS PGT-A process occasionally lead to noisy reads, that are interpreted as multiple chromosomal abnormalities, but actually reflect artifact. For such embryos, re- testing may result in euploid results.

Small studies (published in abstract form only) have evaluated the reproducibility of chaotic results from NGS-based PGT-A. A retrospective cohort study evaluated 58 'chaotic' embryos via PGT-A of re-biopsy samples. Thirty-eight percent (n=22) of embryos had euploid re-biopsy results (4). Our group reported re-biopsy of 64 embryos initially classified as chaotic and identified 17% (n=11) of embryos in the cohort as euploid and only 67% concordance between initial and re-biopsy sample results (5). Four blastocysts with euploid results on re- biopsy were transferred, resulting in two ongoing pregnancies. Furthermore, we have pooled data from multiple IVF clinics within our network that have conducted re-biopsy of embryos with multiple aneuploidies and found that overall, 22% had euploid PGT-A results on re-biopsy (Background Table, unpublished data).

In anticipation of conducting a prospective observational study to characterize the nature of PGT-A results indicating 3 or more aneuploidies, we have begun to catalog and hold these embryos in storage. To date, 112 patients with have explicitly expressed interest in contributing 128 embryos resulted as 'chaotic' or 'complex aneuploid' of 3-5 chromosomes, for the purposes of this research, and we anticipate identifying multiples of this number upon a

retrospective database search and with prospective accumulation of additional PGT-A results. Following a retrospective database search, we have identified a total of 274 'chaotic' and 5251 'complex aneuploid' embryos having been reported using NGS based PGT-A. Limited data exist on the reproductive potential of embryos classified as having multiple chromosomal abnormalities, and preliminary data, including from our center, suggest a high false positive rate. The large volume of ART performed within our network represents a unique opportunity to characterize the clinical significance of these results, in the hopes of minimizing embryo wastage and maximizing live birth from IVF cycles using PGT-A.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the reproductive potential of embryos classified as "complex aneuploid" of three or more chromosomes or "chaotic" on initial trophectoderm biopsy sample analyzed by next generation sequencing based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. We plan to do this by prospectively enrolling patients with embryos classified as such, re-biopsy of the embryos, and analysis of repeat biopsy samples. We also plan to have an independent, blinded geneticist make diagnoses, as possible, based on the NGS profiles.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complex Aneuploidy Chaotic Aneuploidy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Chaotic, Complex, Aneuploidies, Embryos

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multiple Aneuploidy Embryos

Embryos identified by PGT-A as having multiple chromosomal aneuploidies. DNA from trophectoderm re-biopsy samples will be retained by the testing laboratory for confirmatory analysis and quality control under IRB-approved protocols.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Having ≥ 1 embryo classified as whole chromosome chaotic or complex aneuploid of 3 or more chromosomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using an NGS based platform Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Embryos not meeting complex/chaotic criteria Patients declining consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Benjamin Harris

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kate Devine, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Shady Grove Fertility

Benjamin S Harris, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shady Grove Fertility

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IVF Florida Reproductive Associates

Margate, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Fertility Center of Illinois

Highland Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Shady Grove Fertility

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

SGFertility Chile Medicina Reproductiva

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Chile

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

SGF Research Team SGF Research Team

Role: CONTACT

Phone: (301) 545-1423

Email: [email protected]

Benjamin S Harris, MD, MPH

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kathy Miller, PhD, HCLD

Role: primary

Paula Morton

Role: primary

Juergen Lieberman

Role: primary

Role: backup

Joshua Lim

Role: primary

Kim Arcusa

Role: primary

Vanessa Silva

Role: primary

Role: primary

Maria Thompson

Role: primary

Kristine Milne

Role: primary

Caitlin Willaims

Role: primary

Daniel Graff

Role: primary

Role: backup

SGF Research Team SGF Research Team

Role: primary

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20250101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id