Evaluating the Status of Complex Aneuploidy to Locate Additional Transferrable Embryos
NCT ID: NCT07227116
Last Updated: 2025-11-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
280 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-01
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Key Information:
This portion of the study seeks your consent for the re-biopsy and genetic reanalysis of the embryos only. It does not yet include consent for potential future transfer.
Participation remains completely voluntary, and your decision will not affect your current or future care.
We deeply appreciate your support and commitment to advancing fertility research.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The high rate of complex aneuploidy in cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos even among young patients suggests multiple mitotic errors in the first few cell divisions, which would likely lead to developmental arrest (2). Therefore, if transferred, such embryos would be expected not to implant or to miscarry. Historically, embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities have therefore been de-selected for transfer or even discarded. However, recently Lin et al. reported a healthy live birth following chaotic embryo transfer (3), calling into question the assumed non-viability of chaotic embryos. Might some of these embryos correct multiple aneuploidies and become euploid? It is plausible that any euploid population of cells could have a higher survival rate and a higher mitotic rate, and if abnormal cells undergo apoptosis, a euploid embryo could result. This could explain the low rate of complex aneuploidy seen in miscarriages. An additional explanation is that imperfections in the biopsy, amplification, and/or NGS PGT-A process occasionally lead to noisy reads, that are interpreted as multiple chromosomal abnormalities, but actually reflect artifact. For such embryos, re- testing may result in euploid results.
Small studies (published in abstract form only) have evaluated the reproducibility of chaotic results from NGS-based PGT-A. A retrospective cohort study evaluated 58 'chaotic' embryos via PGT-A of re-biopsy samples. Thirty-eight percent (n=22) of embryos had euploid re-biopsy results (4). Our group reported re-biopsy of 64 embryos initially classified as chaotic and identified 17% (n=11) of embryos in the cohort as euploid and only 67% concordance between initial and re-biopsy sample results (5). Four blastocysts with euploid results on re- biopsy were transferred, resulting in two ongoing pregnancies. Furthermore, we have pooled data from multiple IVF clinics within our network that have conducted re-biopsy of embryos with multiple aneuploidies and found that overall, 22% had euploid PGT-A results on re-biopsy (Background Table, unpublished data).
In anticipation of conducting a prospective observational study to characterize the nature of PGT-A results indicating 3 or more aneuploidies, we have begun to catalog and hold these embryos in storage. To date, 112 patients with have explicitly expressed interest in contributing 128 embryos resulted as 'chaotic' or 'complex aneuploid' of 3-5 chromosomes, for the purposes of this research, and we anticipate identifying multiples of this number upon a
retrospective database search and with prospective accumulation of additional PGT-A results. Following a retrospective database search, we have identified a total of 274 'chaotic' and 5251 'complex aneuploid' embryos having been reported using NGS based PGT-A. Limited data exist on the reproductive potential of embryos classified as having multiple chromosomal abnormalities, and preliminary data, including from our center, suggest a high false positive rate. The large volume of ART performed within our network represents a unique opportunity to characterize the clinical significance of these results, in the hopes of minimizing embryo wastage and maximizing live birth from IVF cycles using PGT-A.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reproductive potential of embryos classified as "complex aneuploid" of three or more chromosomes or "chaotic" on initial trophectoderm biopsy sample analyzed by next generation sequencing based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. We plan to do this by prospectively enrolling patients with embryos classified as such, re-biopsy of the embryos, and analysis of repeat biopsy samples. We also plan to have an independent, blinded geneticist make diagnoses, as possible, based on the NGS profiles.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multiple Aneuploidy Embryos
Embryos identified by PGT-A as having multiple chromosomal aneuploidies. DNA from trophectoderm re-biopsy samples will be retained by the testing laboratory for confirmatory analysis and quality control under IRB-approved protocols.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Benjamin Harris
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kate Devine, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Shady Grove Fertility
Benjamin S Harris, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shady Grove Fertility
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IVF Florida Reproductive Associates
Margate, Florida, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Fertility Center of Illinois
Highland Park, Illinois, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Towson, Maryland, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Cary, North Carolina, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Cary, North Carolina, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Shady Grove Fertility
Richmond, Virginia, United States
SGFertility Chile Medicina Reproductiva
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Kathy Miller, PhD, HCLD
Role: primary
Paula Morton
Role: primary
Juergen Lieberman
Role: primary
Role: backup
Joshua Lim
Role: primary
Kim Arcusa
Role: primary
Vanessa Silva
Role: primary
Role: primary
Maria Thompson
Role: primary
Kristine Milne
Role: primary
Caitlin Willaims
Role: primary
Daniel Graff
Role: primary
Role: backup
SGF Research Team SGF Research Team
Role: primary
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20250101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id